Summary of Cycle II
111 achievement test II, that was conducted on Tuesday, October 22
nd
2013, and post-test that was conducted on Thursday, October 24
th
2013. The summary of the students‘ results on the tests could be seen in the following table.
Table 6:
The Summary of the Students‟ Results on the Four Tests Descriptive Statistics
N Minimum Maximum
Mean Std. Deviation
Pre test 30
4.00 6.50
5.0500 0.63109
Post test 30
4.66 7.66
6.3077 0.61185
Achievement test I 30
5.00 9.00
7.0323 1.01600
Achievement test II 30
6.00 9.00
7.7667 0.77385
Valid N listwise 30
Based on the table above, the students‘ mean scores in achievement test II was higher than the students‘ mean scores in achievement test I. The
students‘ mean scores in post-test was also higher than the students‘ mean scores in pre-
test. From the result, it could be concluded that the students‘ reading scores improved from pre-test to post-test and from achievement test I
to achievement test II. Furthermore, the standard deviation in post-test was lower than the
standard deviation in post-test. As said by Burns 2010: 128 that the SD standard deviation tells you how each score deviates on average from the
mean. Because the SD averages things in this way, it is more accurate than the range in showing how scores are spread out, and if there are any outliers, their
effects are minimized. From the statement, it could be concluded that the students‘ reading scores were homogenous. There were no outliers or extreme
112 scores in both pre test and post-test. Moreover, in comparison to the standard
deviation in achievement test I, the standard deviation in achievement test II was lower
. It could also be said that the students‘ reading scores were more homogenous. From the reasons above, it could be concluded that there was a
significant improvement in the students‘ reading comprehension after the implementation of the action, i.e. using schema activation strategy.