Analysis of Pre-test and Post-test

The criteria of the test: α = 0.05 H o : F αn1-1, n2-2 F F αn1-1, n2-2 H1: F F αn1-1, n2-2 The formula used can be seen as follows 1 : or The calculation can be seen as follows: 1.028 n1-1 = 39-1 = 38 n2-1 = 39-1 = 38 F 0.05n1-1, n2-1 = 1.84 F table From the calculation, it can be seen that F F α n1-1, n2-2 1.028 1.84. Based on the criteria, it can be conclude that H o is accepted. It means that the sample in experiment class and controlled class were homogenous.

C. Hypothesis Testing

The researcher calculated the data to test the hypothesis that whether there is significant different between students’ reading ability in descriptive text in experiment class which given the technique of numbered heads together and students’ reading ability in descriptive text in controlled class without given the technique of numbered heads together. Two classes were compared, the experiment class was X variable and the controlled class was Y variable. She used the result of post –test of experimental class and controlled class. She used statistic calculation of the t-test formula with degree significance 5 in the following table: 1 Budi Susetyo, Statistika Untuk Analisis Data Penelitian, Bandung: PT Refika Aditama, 2010, p.160 Table 4.7 The result calculation of post – test of experimental class Score F X X fx x 2 fx 2 45 – 52 4 48.5 3 12 9 36 53 – 60 6 56.5 2 12 4 24 61 – 68 6 64.5 1 6 1 6 69 – 76 15 72.5 77 – 84 7 80.5 -1 -7 1 7 85 – 92 1 88.5 -2 -2 4 4 N = 39 ∑ = 21 ∑ = 67 Based on the table above, the researcher would like to establish the mean, standard deviation and standard error of variable X. The calculation will be described in the following steps: 1. ∑ = 72.5 + 8 21 = 76.80 N 39 2. √∑ – ∑ = 8 √ – = 9.55 N N 39 39 3. SE mx = SD x = 9.55 = 9.55 = 1.550 √ x – 1 √ 6.16 Table 4.8 The result calculation of post – test of controlled class Score F Y Y Fy y 2 fy 2 40 – 47 3 43.5 3 9 9 27 48 – 55 6 51.5 2 12 4 24 56 – 63 8 59.5 1 8 1 8 64 – 71 13 67.5 72 – 79 6 75.5 -1 -6 1 6 80 – 87 3 83.5 -2 -6 4 12 N = 39 ∑ = 17 ∑ 2 = 77 ∑ = 67.5 + 8 17 = 71.02 N 39 √∑ – ∑ = 8 √ – = 10.68 N N 39 39 6. SE my = SD y = 10.68 = 10.68 = 1.733 √ y – 1 √ 6.16 7. SE mx-my = √ = √ = 2.323 8. t o = = = 2.488

Dokumen yang terkait

A Descriptive Study of the Eight Grade Students’ Ability in Writing A Descriptive Paragraph by Using Individual Pictures at SMPN 3 Kencong, Jember in the 2010/2011 Academic Year

0 7 14

A Descriptive Study on Grammatical Errors of the Eighth Grade Students' Narrative Text Writing at SMPN 1 Wuluhan Jember in the 2013/2014 Academic Year

0 6 3

A Descriptive Study on the Eighth Grade Students’ Reading Comprehension Achievement of Recount Texts at SMPN 1 Banyuwangi in the 2014/2015

0 5 4

The Effect of Using Puzzle on the Eighth Grade Students’ Vocabulary Achievement at SMPN I4 Jember in the 2013/2014 Academic Year

0 6 3

The Effectiveness of Personal Vocabulary Notes (PVN) Technique on Students’ Vocabulary Understanding; An Experimental Research in the Seventh Grade Students in MTs. Salafiyah Bedahan in Academic Year 2013/2014

2 11 136

The Effectiveness of Using Jigsaw Technique to Develop Students’ Reading Comprehension on Narrative Text; A Quasi Experimental Study at the Eleventh Grade Students of SMA Negeri 63 Jakarta Selatan

0 6 139

The Effectiveness of Jigsaw Technique in Teacihing Reading Conprehension : An Experimental Study at the Second Grade of MAN 2 Bekasi

0 6 61

The Effectiveness of Using Mind Mapping in Improving Students' Reading Comprehension of Narrative Text A Quasi Experimental Study at the Second Grade of SMA Mathla’ul Huda Parung Panjang-Bogor.

0 5 126

The Effectiveness of Numbered Heads Together Technique (NHT) Toward Students’ Reading Ability on Descriptive Text A Quasi Experimental Study at the Second Grade of SMPN 2 Tangerang Selatan in Academic Year 2013/2014

1 9 128

The Effectiveness of Using CIRC Technique to improve Students’ Reading Comprehension on Recount Text(Pre Experimental Study at Second Year Students of MTsN Rajeg)

0 4 113