Sampling Constructing the Instrument
55 Statement 2 confirmed the fact of the participants whether or not they
knew how to operate the computer or laptop. This statement did not refer to those who had their own computer or laptop only. However, it could also be interpreted
as those who did not have. The results showed that 2.22 of them who strongly agreed, 2.22 of them who agreed, 22.22 of them who disagreed, and 73.33 of
them who strongly disagreed. While there were 4.44 of the participants who did not know how to operate the computer or laptop, there were 95.55 of them who
knew how to operate them. Statement 3 confirmed the fact of the participants whether they could use
the programs, or the Internet. This statement could be interpreted differently, depending on each participant. If they knew how to use the programs or the
Internet, they would agree on this statement. The programs could be everything which they mastered. The Internet could also be interpreted as simple as when
they used it, i.e., browsing, or downloading. The results showed that 53.33 of them who strongly agreed, 40.00 of them who agreed, and 6.67 of them who
were undecided. From these results, there were 93.33 of the participants who agreed on this statement. It meant that most of the participants could use the
programs, or the Internet. Statement 4 tried to discover the participants
‟ knowledge whether they knew Sanata Dharma University had the computer laboratories. Since ELESP was
located in the Mrican area, the participants would know that the campus had two computer laboratories in the Campus I and one workstation in
Sanata Dharma‟s library. These rooms were available for all the students and lecturers. The results
56 showed that 55.56 of them who strongly agreed, 40.00 of them who agreed,
and 4.44 of them who were undecided. Two participants who chose the undecided option showed that they did not know their campus very well.
Therefore, most of the participants in 95.56 agreed that they knew Sanata Dharma University had some computer laboratories.
Statement 5 confirmed the participants‟ opinion whether or not the
computer skills were needed in the future. The computer skills were really needed in the future because it helped the peop
le‟s career. Wilson 2010 supports, “further, with the growing demand for college graduates with improved computer
and internet literacy, inclusion of these technologies can help widen students career possibilities after graduation” p. 9. It meant that after the graduation, the
students who had the computer literacy would be more needed in the future jobs. The results showed that 2.22 of the participants who strongly agreed, 26.67 of
them who disagreed, and 71.11 of them who strongly disagreed. The participants 97.78 who chose the disagreement scales showed that they knew
the computer skills were important in the future. After analyzing Table 4.1, the researcher concluded that the participants had a good response to the computer
literacy. Next, Table 4.2 presented
the participants‟ background of the Internet literacy. Statement 6 confirmed the participants whether they were the active users
of the Internet. The results showed that 48.89 of the participants who strongly agreed, 42.22 of them who agreed, 4.44 of them who were undecided, and
4.44 of them who disagreed. Since this statement confirmed the fact of being