Research Method RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

31 proper final questionnaire. Johnson and Christensen 2012 recommend “it is a cardinal rule in researc h that you must “try out,” or pilot test, your questionnaire to determine whether it operates properly before using it in a research study” p. 183. In the pilot questionnaire, the researcher distributed to ten participants in T- Junction. Johnson and Chri stensen 2012 also support that “you should conduct your pilot test with a minimum of 5 to 10 people” p. 183. After distributing the pilot questionnaire, the researcher observed the result. Finally, the researcher eliminated some statements and gave some changes to the final questionnaire. For the final questionnaire, the researcher gathered the data by going to campus and looking for the lecturers and students batches 2011-2014. The researcher stayed in T-Junction, lorong cinta, student hall, and canteen. The researcher stayed there because ELESP lecturers and students could be found in those places. When the researcher met the ELESP students in those places, the researcher asked them what batch they were. If the students were from the same batch, i.e., they were batch 2012 and the researcher had already gotten ten students as the participants, the researcher would have looked for other students who were from the other batches 2011, 2013, or 2014. Then the researcher asked them whether they wanted to be the participants. After that, the researcher gave the questionnaire to them. For the ELESP lecturers, the researcher waited for them in those places and asked them whether they wanted to be the participants in this research. If they were willing to be the participants, the researcher would have given the questionnaire to them. 32 The researcher also used the positive and negative statements in this questionnaire. The calculation for the positive and negative statements would be different. Djaali and Muljono 2007 suggest that the positive statement is scored 5,4,3,2, and 1; while the negative statement is scored 1,2,3,4 and 5 or -2, -1, 0, 1, and 2 with the Likert scale form is strongly agree, agree, undecided, disagree, and strongly disagree p. 28. Since the questionnaire consisted of the positive and negative statements, the researcher would explain all of them. The questionnaire consisted of two big categories. The first category was about the further information about blended learning. Then, the second category was about the blended learning implementation in ELESP. Category 1 –Further Information about Blended Learning Statement 1: I have a computer or laptop. This is a positive statement which is about the fact of having a computer or laptop. The participants who have the computer or laptop will agree on this statement. Meanwhile, those who do not have, they will reject it. Statement 2: I do not know how to operate the computer or laptop This statement is related to the previous statement. The participants who have the computer or laptop usually know how to operate their computer or laptop. Sometimes there are people who do not have the computer or laptop, but