Pre-questionnaire The Result of Questionnaires Pre-questionnaire and Post-questionnaire

that they want to learn English by fun and effective and 4 other students stated that adding by quiz. 6 13 21 students stated that pronoun is “Kata ganti penghubung” which have function to joining 2 sentences. 9 students stated that pronoun is “Kata ganti” such as we, they, I, You, She, He”. 4 students stated that pronoun is “Question words”. 7 14 30 students stated that pronoun is difficult material because of various reasons such as; 10 students stated that they have difficulty in joining 2 sentences, 5 students do not understand yet about pronoun, 2 students stated that it is complicated, because in pronoun they learn many words and feel confuse which one will be used. While 8 students stated that pronoun is easy if we learn it well, because pronoun is easy to be remembered and easy to be understood.

b. Post-questionnaire

The students of VIII-1 were given the post-questionnaire on May 20, 2011 in the last meeting. This questionnaire consisted of 4 open questions; here is the students’ answer: a. Most of student wrote that learn by CTL make them easier to memorize and to understand the material and make learn funnier, because this method is connecting the material and their daily life. b. Almost all of the students 97 wrote “Yes” with various reasons, such as “Because we learn with fun so we easier to understand”, and “Obviously, we find many personal pronoun in daily life, especially in English songs”. c. 43 students 21 students wrote that they found some difficulties, such as “Some words make me confuse” or “I don’t understand yet about personal pronoun”. While according 10 other students, they didn’t find any difficulties, even they felt enjoy learn by using CTL, because they often find it in their daily life. d. 9 students 19 wrote that “That was enough, nothing that must be changed ”. 7 students wrote that the teacher should explain more detail. 4 students wrote that the teacher was lack of interaction.

4. The Result of Observation

The description of the result of observation is like in this table below: Table 4.3 The Result of Observation Every Meeting No Aspek yang di Amati Jumlah Siswa Pertemuan Ke- 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 Menjawab Salam 46 46 46 42 44 46 2 Menjawab saat ditanyakan kabar 8 17 19 16 11 14 3 Menjawab pertanyaan saat apersepsi 9 13 18 8 16 21 4 menjawab pertanyaan saat brainstorming 15 5 Membuat dan mengumpulkan PR 44 45 27 19 6 Memperhatikan penjelasan guru 46 42 44 31 35 41 7 Menanyakan yang belum jelas 5 3 1 2 4 1 8 Berinisiatif menjawab, menyanggah dan memberi tanggapan secara lisan 13 14 9 4 8 12 9 Mengerjakan latihantugas 46 38 10 Membentuk kelompok 46 11 Mengerjakan soal pre-test 46 46 12 Mengerjakan soal post-test 46 46 13 Memperhatikan saat membahas soal pre-testpost-test 46 44 46 14 Berinisiatif untuk perform 3 5 8 15 Membuat kesimpulan 1 4 7 2 2 7 Note: Pada Hari ini kegiatan tersebut tidak di laksanakan

B. Data Interpretation

After describing the result of the data, the writer wants to make a data interpretation from the data above.

1. The Result of Interview

From the data description above, it could be interpret that the students of second year of SMP Raden Patah is divided into 3 classs and the VIII-1 is the favourite class. The English teacher usually uses CTL mothod. The students have so many problem in mastery the material, one of the problem is about pronoun.

2. The Result of Tests Pre-test and Post-test 1 Pre-test and Post-test 2

From the 4 tests that have done, one of the criteria of success is reached. The writer’s target was 75 of students’ score are reached the KKM, while the result of last test of this research is research is 100 of students are reached the KKM. For more detail achievement of every test, would be explained bellow: a. The Result of First Pre-Test From the calculation above, showed that the students’ average score was 55 it still below the KKM. The sum of students who reached the KKM was 13 students 28. 26 . The highest score was 78 and the lowest score was 31. b. The Result of First Post-Test From the calculation above, showed that the students ’ average score was 77 there was an improvement in average score, that was 40 . 43 students 93. 48 were reached the KKM. The highest score was 100 and the lowest score was 56. c. The Result of Second Pre-Test From the calculation above, showed that the students’ average score was 76. The sum of students who reached the KKM was 40 students 86. 96 . The highest score was 90 and the lowest score was 60. d. The Result of Second Post-Test From the calculation above, showed that the students’ average score was 87 there was an improvement in average score that was 41. 47 . All of the students 46 of students were reached the KKM. The highest score was 97 and the lowest score was 65.

3. The Result of Questionnaires Pre-questionnaire and Post-questionnaire

Dokumen yang terkait

Improving students' writing ability through clustering technique (A classroom action research in the second year of SMP al-hasra Bojongsari- Depok)

4 11 109

Improving Students' Ability in Using Conditional Sentence Type 2 Through Contextual Teaching and Learning

0 4 131

Minat mahasiswa pendidkan Agama Islam dalam pembelajaran kitab kuning

0 7 84

Improving students ability in using imperative total sentences through total

1 9 123

IMPROVING STUDENTS GROUP ACTIVITY IN MATHEMATICS LEARNING THROUGH COOPERATIVE LEARNING COMMUNITY Improving Students Group Activity In Mathematics Learning Through Cooperative Learning Community(CLC) Approach Using Peer Teaching.

0 1 14

IMPROVING STUDENTS GROUP ACTIVITY IN MATHEMATICS LEARNING THROUGH COOPERATIVE LEARNING COMMUNITY Improving Students Group Activity In Mathematics Learning Through Cooperative Learning Community(CLC) Approach Using Peer Teaching.

0 1 12

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY MASTERY IN LEARNING ENGLISH USING CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING (CTL): IMPROVING STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY MASTERY IN LEARNING ENGLISH USING CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING (CTL): A CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH OF THE FOURTH

0 1 16

ACTION RESEARCH ON IMPROVING STUDENTS’ MOTIVATION IN SPEAKING THROUGH CONTEXTUAL TEACHING LEARNING.

0 0 27

Improving Teaching Quality and Problem Solving Ability Through Contextual Teaching and Learning in Differential Equations: A Lesson Study Approach

0 0 13

CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING TECHNIQUE IN IMPROVING STUDENTS’ ABILITY TO WRITE DESCRIPTIVE SENTENC

0 0 10