Technique of Trustworthiness RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

c. Yes, I ask them to make conclusion sometimes by asking and answer, so I can measure how far is their understanding the material that we have delivered. d. Yes, seldom enough. Because to make an English laboratory, we still try to build it. e. Yes, so the students can make a connection between the materials in the classroom with their real live. f. I use various of methods, but mostly I use contextual. g. Yes, it’s effective enough. h. Contextual is more emphasize in connecting the materials that the students learn with the their real live, so they can feel the function and advantages of the material that they have leared. i. Wow, if we talk about material problems, I have so many problems, usually in grammar, because in grammar, students learn so many things such as formulas, the pattern of sentences, pronoun, word class an so on. j. About pronoun yes, they still make some mistakes, moreover if they make it in the sentences, it can make confuse the readers, such as in make sentence, I like you shoes, she buy I ice cream.

2. The Result of Tests Pre-test and Post-test 1 Pre-test and Post-test 2

To get the valid test instruments for the real subject of this research VIII-1 class, the writer tried some questions about personal pronoun then tried the questions to another classes VIII-2 and VIII-3. For the first, the writer entered the VIII-2 class on Monday, April 18 th 2011 and then continued to the VIII-3 class on Wednesday, April 20 th 2011. After got the result, the writer selected the questions to look for the valid iteminstrument. For the first pre test, provided 30 questions and selected 15 valid questions. For the first post test, the writer provided 50 questions, but the valid questions only 15. For the second pre-test from 50 questions, selected 15 valid questions and the last for the second post-test, the writer provided 30 questions without any options and selected 20 valid questions. After the questions tested to other classes, the writer used the valid questions in VIII-1 class. And the result as follow: Table 4.1 The Result of Students’ Scores for Pre Test and Post Tests Name Result of the Tests 1 st pre-test 1 st post-test 2 nd pre-test 2 nd post-test X1 31 77 63 73 X2 52 93 67 76 X3 42 90 77 95 X4 68 87 73 89 X5 73 80 83 97 X6 73 83 90 97 X7 36 80 80 95 X8 73 100 87 97 X9 26 80 87 76 X10 47 77 73 92 X11 36 70 90 92 X12 78 67 83 95 X13 73 87 87 92 X14 31 73 77 89 X15 47 70 83 86 X16 57 70 80 86 X17 68 83 83 97 X18 36 56 77 95 X19 47 83 70 89 X20 57 80 80 84 X21 47 73 60 89 X22 52 60 73 76 X23 63 83 77 92 X24 36 77 90 89 X25 52 73 60 86 X26 52 73 60 65 X27 63 80 87 97 X28 52 73 60 84 X29 42 73 83 84 X30 63 80 87 95 X31 42 83 80 86 X32 42 63 80 89 X33 78 67 67 84 X34 73 67 63 84 X35 78 80 87 95 X36 78 83 67 92 X37 68 80 73 92 X38 57 83 67 84 X39 57 77 77 89 X40 63 63 70 84 X41 52 90 80 95 X42 47 90 70 84 X43 63 73 90 74 X44 68 73 80 89 X45 52 80 87 92 X46 47 90 70 84 SUM 2538 3574 3535 4046 VERAGE 55 77 76 87 Note: students who achieved KKM The detail information about the result of the tests are explained bellow: 1 The Result of First Pre-Test a The Average Score:  = ΣX N  = 2538 = 55 46 b Sum of the Students who Reached KKM: P = F X 100 N P = 13 X 100 = 28. 26 46 2 The Result of First Post-Test a The Average Score:  = ΣX N  = 3574 = 77 46 b Sum of the Students who Reached KKM: P = F X 100 N P = 43 X 100 = 93. 48 46 c Δ 1 st pre-test – 1 st post-test: P = Y 1 – Y X 100 Y P = 77-55 X 100 = 40 55

Dokumen yang terkait

Improving students' writing ability through clustering technique (A classroom action research in the second year of SMP al-hasra Bojongsari- Depok)

4 11 109

Improving Students' Ability in Using Conditional Sentence Type 2 Through Contextual Teaching and Learning

0 4 131

Minat mahasiswa pendidkan Agama Islam dalam pembelajaran kitab kuning

0 7 84

Improving students ability in using imperative total sentences through total

1 9 123

IMPROVING STUDENTS GROUP ACTIVITY IN MATHEMATICS LEARNING THROUGH COOPERATIVE LEARNING COMMUNITY Improving Students Group Activity In Mathematics Learning Through Cooperative Learning Community(CLC) Approach Using Peer Teaching.

0 1 14

IMPROVING STUDENTS GROUP ACTIVITY IN MATHEMATICS LEARNING THROUGH COOPERATIVE LEARNING COMMUNITY Improving Students Group Activity In Mathematics Learning Through Cooperative Learning Community(CLC) Approach Using Peer Teaching.

0 1 12

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY MASTERY IN LEARNING ENGLISH USING CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING (CTL): IMPROVING STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY MASTERY IN LEARNING ENGLISH USING CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING (CTL): A CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH OF THE FOURTH

0 1 16

ACTION RESEARCH ON IMPROVING STUDENTS’ MOTIVATION IN SPEAKING THROUGH CONTEXTUAL TEACHING LEARNING.

0 0 27

Improving Teaching Quality and Problem Solving Ability Through Contextual Teaching and Learning in Differential Equations: A Lesson Study Approach

0 0 13

CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING TECHNIQUE IN IMPROVING STUDENTS’ ABILITY TO WRITE DESCRIPTIVE SENTENC

0 0 10