The Result of Expert Judgment of Unit 2
develop their reading skills. 4
The developed materials lead the students to perform and develop their vocabulary skills.
4 5
The developed materials lead the students to understand the linguistic features of the discussed text.
4
Mean ᵡ
3.6
The table 35 shows that the contents of the materials of Unit 3 were considered “very good” by having value in the range of 3.25 ≤ x ≤ 4. It could be
seen through the mean of the general judgment which is gained from five questions related to the content of the materials.
Table 36: The Language Appropriateness of the Unit 3
No Items
Scores
1 The language used in the explanations and instructions are
clear and understandable. 3
2 The language used in the developed materials is
grammatically correct. 3
3 The language used in the developed materials is cohesive and
coherent. 3
4 The developed materials consistently use one variation of
English. 3
Mean ᵡ
3
Table 36 presents the language appropriateness of unit 3. The result of the table 36
was considered as “good” by having value in the range of 2.5 ≤ x ≤ 3.24.
Table 37: The Presentation Appropriateness of the Unit 3
No Items
Scores
1 The tasks are arranged systematically from the easiest to the
most difficult. 4
2 The developed materials are balance in terms of texts,
illustrations and symbols. 4
3 The developed materials support the students to get
information within the texts. 4
4 The developed materials contain opening activities, main
activities and closing activities. 4
5 The developed materials are completed with vocabulary list
related to the unit topic. 4
6 The developed materials provide evaluation part for the
students to check their understanding. 4
7 The learning objectives are stated in every unit of the
developed materials. 4
Mean ᵡ
4
Table 37 presents the result of experts’ judgment related to the
presentation appropriateness of the materials of Unit 3. The mean of the general judgment of the presentation appropriateness was 4. It means that the
presentation of the unit was categorized as “very good”. Table 38: The Layout Appropriateness of the Unit 3
No Items
Scores
1 The developed materials are printed on ISO-standardized size
paper A4, A5, B5. 4
2 The layout of the developed materials use the appropriate
placement of the unit title, sub-title, page number, illustrations and captions.
3 3
The developed materials use the appropriate variation of fonts.
4 4
The fonts used are not too big or too small. 3
5 The color usage of the developed materials is not disturbing
2
the readers. 6
The illustration and graphic design in the developed materials are aesthetic and functional.
3
Mean ᵡ
3.1
Table 38 shows the result of analysis of the layout appropriateness in Unit 3. The mean of the layout appropriateness was 3.1. Therefore, the layout
appropriateness in Unit 3 was categorized as “good”.