3.6. Zoning for Tourism Attraction in Malang Regency
Determination zoning area is a strategy of tourism object developing in Malang regency. There is 5 Zone in Malang Regency Badan Perencanaan
Kabupaten Malang, 2006 :
Table 6. Zoning area in Malang Regency
No. Zone
Subdistrict Tourism Services Centre
1 I
• Pakis
• Tumpang
• Jabung
• Tajinan
• Wajak and
• Poncokusumo
Tumpang
2 II
• Kasembon
• Pujon and
• Ngantang
Pujon 3
III •
Donomulyo •
Bantur •
Gedangan •
Sumbermanjing Wetan •
Tirtoyudo and •
Ampelgading Sumbermanjing Wetan
4 IV
• Wonosari
• Wagir
• Dau
• Kepanjen
• Sumber Pucung
• Pagak
• Bululawang
• Gondanglegi
• Kalipare
• Kromengan
• Pagelaran
• Pakisaji
• Turen
• Ngajum and
• Dampit
Kepanjen
5 V
• Lawang
• Karangploso and
• Singosari
Singosari
Source: Badan Perencanaan Kabupaten Malang, 2006
Figure 6. Zone in Malang Regency
There are three interpretation alternatives route in every zone. The first alternative is developed by classifying the visited stops based on the object with
horticulture fruits, flowers and vegetables and non plant bendungan, waterfall, fishpond, etc as the agrotourism attraction. Second, is developed by classifying
the visited stops based on the object with non horticulture plant and non plant as the agrotourism attraction. The last alternative is developed by visiting all
agrotourism objects without classifying the tourism resources.
3.7. Analytical Hierarchy Process
A comparative judgment is needed to select the prioritizing interpretation alternatives route in every zone. Analytical Hierarchy Process AHP is used in
this research by setting some required criteria in weighting the priority factors of defined alternatives in pair wise comparisons. These priority weights are obtained
by capturing expert perception towards the most preferable alternatives of interpretation route based on certain considerations.
Defined the prioritizing interpretation alternatives route among those three alternatives is become the first level and the goal in this stage. The second level,
that contribute to the goal are educational benefits, recreational benefits, and inspirational benefits. In the last or third level are the three alternatives of
interpretation routes. A pairwise comparison is arranged to compare the relative importance of
criteria at the second level with respect to the objective or goal at the first level. The criteria used in second level are adopted from the perspective of benefits of
interpretation received by individuals, where benefits can be classified as educational, recreational, and inspirational benefits Knudson, et. al., 1995. Other
pairwise also use to compare each alternative at the third level with respect to the criteria at the second level.
Figure 7. Analytical Hierarchy Process to define the Prioritizing Interpretation Alternative Route of Agrotourism in Malang Regency
3.8. Flowchart of Study
Kategori