The Results of Expert Judgment and Revision of Unit 2
continued 15. The unitsactivitiesparagraphssentences
reflect in good arrangement
3 16. The unitsactivitiesparagraphssentences
reflect in good engagement 4
From Table 28, it can be seen that the mean x̅ value of the
appropriateness of the language of Unit 2 is 3.13. The aspect was categorized as “Good”, because its position was in the interval 2.49 ≤ x̅ ≤ 3.24.
c The Appropriateness of Presentation The expert judgment data of the appropriateness of presentation of Unit 2
is presented in Table 29.
Table 29 : The Appropriateness of Presentation of Unit 2
No Item Score
17. The developed materials are presented systematically
4 18. The developed materials present the texts,
activities, and pictures equally 4
19. The developed materials encourage students’
initiative and creativity in written language 3
20. The developed materials encourage interaction between students, between students and
teachers, and
between students
and environment
4 21. The developed materials encourage students
to do reflection and evaluation in learning activities and encourage communicating in
English 4
22. The tasks encourage students to communicate in written language.
4 23. The tasks are started by guided activities to
free activities 3
24. The tasks are arranged in scientific method. 3
25. The tasks and pictures have identity such as title, number, or reference.
3
From Table 29, it can be seen that the mean x̅ value of the
appropriateness of the presentation of Unit 2 is 3.5. The aspect was
categorized as “Very Good”, because its position was in the interval 3.25 ≤ x̅ ≤ 4.
d The Appropriateness of Layout The expert judgment data of the appropriateness of layout of Unit 2 is
presented in Table 30.
Table 30 : The Appropriateness of Layout of Unit 2
No Item Score
26. The layout of developed materials is interesting
4 27. Font type and color are easily to read
4 28. The font variation is adequate
4 29. The font variation is not many
4 30. The space between paragraphs is normal
4 31. The picturesillustrations are relevant to the
topic of materials 4
32. The picturesillustrations are used in esthetic and functional aspect
4 33. The picturesillustrations are proportional and
explained the core of materials. 4
34. Titles are placed consistently 4
From Table 30, it can be seen that the mean x̅ value of the
appropriateness of the layout of Unit 2 is 4. The aspect was categorized as
“Very Good”, because its position was in the interval 3.25 ≤ x̅ ≤ 4. e The appropriateness of Content and Language of Comic Strips.
The expert judgment data of appropriateness of content and language of comic strips of Unit 2 is presented in Table 31.
Table 31 : The Appropriateness of Content and Language of Comic
Strips of Unit 2 No
Item Score
35. The story
of comic
strips achieves
the communicative purposes
4 36. The story is presented clearly and easily to be
understood 4
37. The story plot is clear 4
38. The word choice is appropriate 3
39. The dialogue is related to themes 4
From Table 31, it can be seen that the mean x̅ value of the
appropriateness of content and language of comic strips of Unit 2 is 3.8. The aspect was
categorized as “Very Good”, because its position was in the interval 3.25
≤ x̅ ≤ 4. f The Appropriateness of Comic Illustrations.
The expert judgment data of appropriateness of content and language of comic strips of Unit 2 is presented in Table 32.
Table 32 : The Appropriateness of Comic Illustrations of Unit 2
No Item
Score 40.
The panels are adequate 4
41. The panel shape does not interfere the
speech balloon 4
42. The characters are varied.
4 43.
The characters represent the daily life human
4 44.
The characters are knowable 4
45. The strips are presented clear
4 46.
The speech balloons are presented following the expression of the characters
4 47.
The speech balloons do not interfere the illustrations
4 48.
The background is related to the themes 4
49. The color variation is adequate
3
From Table 32, it can be seen that the mean x̅ value of the
appropriateness of comic strip illustrations of Unit 2 is 3.9. The aspect was categorized as “Very Good”, because its position was in the interval 3.25 ≤ x̅
≤ 4. 2 The Review of Unit 2
Based on the results of the expert judgment, it can be concluded that the developed materials were very good. It can be shown from the mean
x̅ value of Unit 2 was 3.7. However, there were some aspects that need to be revised.
The review of Unit 2 is presented in Table 33.
Table 33 : The Review of Unit 2
No Aspect Suggestion
1. The contents Put more examples in the input text of
using word “one” as the object 2. The language
Check the grammar Revise the instruction of Task 14
Delete some words 3. The presentation
No suggestion 4. The layout
No suggestion 5. The content and language
of comic strips Change some words in the comic strip
of Task 3 Change some punctuation marks
6. The Illustration of comic strips
No suggestion
3 The Revision of Unit 2 After the suggestion was given by the expert, the researcher revised some
aspects of Unit 2. The revision of Unit 2 is presented in Table 34
Table 34: The Revision of Unit 2
No Suggestion
Revision 1. Put more examples in the input
text of using word “one” as the object
Some examples of using “one” as object were added in the input texts.
2. Check the grammar The grammar was checked
3. Revise the instruction of Task 14
The instruction was made into a simple and clear sentence.
4. Delete some words Words were deleted
5. Change some words in the
comic strip of Task 3 The words are changed
6. Change the punctuation
The punctuation were changed
The detailed description about revision of Unit 2 can be seen in Appendix I.