48
8 Asked the students to keep their vocabulary card and retain their
vocabulary by keep their memory through vocabulary card. Third Meeting
Monday, March 4
th
2011 at 13.45 am – 15.00 p m
1 Reviewed the material and student homework.
2 Teacher made them a group of four and introduced them about the
game “not belong” and asked them to be active in the game. This game function to measure their vocabulary related to noun, verb,
adjective and adverb.
3 Give students a worksheet and asked them to do the task with their
partner.
c. Observing
In this phase, the researcher observed the students’ participation in
the process of vocabulary teaching learning process on pre, whilst and post vocabulary activities through observation
. In the first meeting, the observer watched the students were
interested in the lesson given through vocabulary card games, but there was the class still had a problem in making a vocabulary card, the
students do not understand well how to make a vocabulary card then it made class noisy. The students couldn’t concentrate on the explanation
given by the teacher about noun and adjective and they cou ldn’t
understand well about noun and adjective it is known from their scores on the worksheet given.
In the second meeting, the observer watched the better classroom condition; they are already known how to make a vocabulary card and
the students do not make a lot of noise in the class. The students were interested to follow the teacher instruction to play a game through
vocabulary card. In the second meeting the observer still find the problem from the students there are five students do not bring their last
vocabulary card then it disturbed the other students to do the activity given the teacher.
49
In the third meeting, the observer watched the class was in a good condition, but there still had a problem because there is a student who
forgot to bring their vocabulary card then disturbed the other friends to follow the activity given. But outside of the problem the class could
understand the lesson. It could be seen from their scores from the worksheet given.
The next is collecting data or materials for the post test 1. The result of post test showed the mean score of the class increased to 58.0
in which there were 18 students who passed the Minimum Mastery Criterion or KKM 60.
9
The detail result of instruments used in the first cycle can be seen below:
1 The Result of Students’ Vocabulary Achievement Cycle 1
To know the result of students’ vocabulary achievement, first, the researcher needs to calculate the mean score. The mean score derived
from the following formula:
_ = 58 X
Then, the researcher c alculated the class percentage that’s passed
the Minimum Mastery Criterion, using the following formula: 100
x N
F
30 100
18x
P = 60
9
See Appendix 6b.
_ ∑x
X = ── n
_ 1740
X = ── 30
50
Table 4.2. The Students’ vocabulary Score of Posttest 1
Figure 4.1. The Students’ Improvement in Vocabulary Score in the 1
st
Cycle No.
Students’ name Post-Test Score
1 Student 1
65 2
Student 2 70
3 Student 3
40 4
Student 4 55
5 Student 5
65 6
Student 6 40
7 Student 7
60 8
Student 8 75
9 Student 9
60 10
Student 10 35
11 Student 11
50 12
Student 12 70
13 Student 13
80 14
Student 14 60
15 Student 15
60 16
Student 16 60
17 Student 17
55 18
Student 18 65
19 Student 19
65 20
Student 20 55
21 Student 21
60 22
Student 22 65
23 Student 23
65 24
Student 24 50
25 Student 25
40 26
Student 26 55
27 Student 27
45 28
Student 28 60
29 Student 29
60 30
Student 30 55
MEAN 58
40 50
60 Preliminary
Study Cycle 1
Preliminary Study Cycle 1
51
The data showed that the mean score of posttest 1 was 58.0. There were eighteen students or 60 of the students who got the score above
the Minimum Mastery Criterion, meanwhile the other 12 students were below that criterion.
It implied that the first criterion has not fulfilled. Based on the result of the students’ vocabulary achievement in the
cycle 1, there w as an increase of students’ mean score from the
students’ vocabulary achievement on the preliminary study to the students’ vocabulary achievement on the first cycle. It was from
preliminary study mean score from the mean class 49.6 increased to 58.0 or from 5 students who passed the score above the Minimum
Mastery Criterion to 18 students .
That means that there was 16.9 of mean score improvement. The improvement percentage derived from
the formula:
10
100
1
y y
y
P = 100
6 .
49 6
. 49
. 58
P = 16.9
d. Reflecting