Students The resu Students’ Responses to the Questionnaire

t c g 8 d a a o their peers’ composition given by pe 81.6 of the Figu

d. Students

Base after the imp agree” and 2 or “strongly ’ feedback ns. Moreover er on the wr e students ag ure 4.20 Stu The influen s’ Perception ed on Figure plementation 20.4 of th disagree. A 20 40 60 80 20 40 60 80 100 as their c r, Figure 4.2 riting. There gree, and 2 dents’ consid nce of feedba n on the Im e 4.22, 100 n of peer fee e students c ll the studen 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 30.6 69 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.3 81 consideration 21 reveals h e were 16.3 of the stude deration to in Figure 4 ack given by mplementatio of the stud edback 79.6 chose “agree nts still expec 9.4 0.00.0 1.6 2.00.0 n to revise how far the of the stu ents disagree nclude peers .21 peer on writ on of Peer F dents still ne 6 of the stu e”. Here, no cted to have Stro Agr Agr Dis Stro Dis e their draf influence o udents strong ed with the s feedback fo ting improve Feedback eeded teache udents chose o one chose teacher feed ongly ree ree sagree ongly sagree Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree 40 ft of their of feedback gly agreed, statement. or revision ment er feedback e “strongly “disagree” dback. p c 4 t e q c Figur peer feedbac chose “stron 4.1 of the that peer fee Figure 4.23

e. The resu

First question Se counted int Figure re 4.23 pres ck in writing ngly agree” a students dis edback shoul Students’ pr ults of open- ly, the resea ee Appendi to the perc 0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 e 4.22 Stude sents the stu g class. The and 57.1 o sagreed with ld be implem reference on -ended ques archer made x 5. For n entage after 79.6 20.4 38.8 57.1 4 ents’ need of udents’ pref e results show of the studen h the stateme mented n wri the impleme class . stions e the raw dat number 26, r it was c 4 0.00.0 4.1 0.0 teacher feed ference on t wed that 38 nts chose “ag ent. Most of iting class. entation of p ta of each q the raw da lustered as Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree Agree Disagre Strongly Disagre back the impleme 8.8 of th gree”. There the students eer feedback question in o ata of the r positive o e e y ee y ee 41 entation of he students e were only s suggested k in writing open-ended results was or negative 42 comments. The students’ responses of the open-ended questions are presented as follows: Table 4.1. The result of open-ended question of the questionnaire Question Positive comments Negative comments Please give comments on your experience in going peer feedback in writing 34 69.39 15 30.61 Meanwhile, question number 27 How should peer feedback be implemented in writing class? deals with the suggestions from the students about the implementation of peer feedback. Hence, the responses cannot be counted into percentage since the answers are different each other. Analyzing the raw data, the researcher clusters some suggestions the students gave. The students suggested that peer feedback should be done before the composition would be submitted to the teacher. It should be done before teacher feedback. Therefore, the teacher should be involved in the process of peer feedback. They also suggested that in the process of peer feedback, the teacher should provide a kind of checklist to help them in correcting the composition. Additionally, they suggested that peer feedback should not be done in every assignment or every meeting.

2. Students’ Responses to the Peer Feedback Checklist