52
From the data above, it can be said that most of students enjoy joining extracurricular English Club. They liked the topics being discussed because the
learning activities were so vary. The language was understandable by the students. They became more confident in this course. There was one student who did not
like the topic being discussed and less confident. There were three students who felt bored to the learning activity.
Students’ opinion in the implementation of the designed materials: 1.
I liked this activity because I felt comfortable. 2.
This activity made me more motivated in learning English. 3.
I got more vocabularies in this course. 4.
I became more enthusiastic and confident to speak in front of the class. 5.
These activities made me feel learning by playing. 6.
We can interact to each others. Some students commented that they felt bored when the instruction was
not understood by the students. The teacher always asks the students whether they know the instruction or not. When students had not understand the instruction yet,
they teacher explained it again. From data of the participants’ opinion, it was found that the means ranged
from 3.51 – 5.00. It was also found the average means was 4.24. It could be concluded that students enjoyed and liked learning activities as the researcher
implemented in extracurricular English Club.
53
CHAPTER V CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS
This chapter consists of two parts. The first part is the conclusion of the study. The second is the suggestions that are expected to help the English teachers of
SMP Negeri 1 Muntilan in teaching extracurricular English Club and for other researchers.
A. Conclusion
This study was to design of English instructional materials for English Club
in SMP Negeri 1 Muntilan. There were two problem formulations in this study. Those problems were 1 What does the designed set of materials for
extracurricular English Club in SMP Negeri 1 Muntilan look like? 2 What are the students’ responses to the implementation of the designed materials?
In the syllabus, it was covered eight units but only three units were developed in the research. The researcher implemented one unit. They were
Hobbies, Family, and Shopping. The more complete design can be seen in the appendix.
From the statistical data, it was found that the means ranged from 3.51 – 5.00. It was also found the average means was 3.76. It could be concluded that the
materials design were good design and acceptable for the students of extracurricular English Club in SMP Negeri 1 Muntilan.
54
To answer the second research problem, the researcher distributed questionnaire to the students. It was conducted to get the response whether the
materials design were interesting and acceptable. From the statistical data, it was found that the means ranged from 3.51 – 5.00. It was also found the average
means was 4.24. It could be concluded that students enjoyed and liked learning activities as the researcher implemented in extracurricular English Club.
B. Suggestions
The researcher has some suggestions to the English teacher and other researcher who conduct the same study.
1. Suggestion for English teacher
In teaching extracurricular, it should be better if the teacher know the students needs. Materials that suit the students’ needs will help the learning
activity be more success. Then, teacher should know the approach that will be used in teaching extracurricular like Communicative Language Teaching. This
approach will help teacher in managing their students and leads teacher to be more creative in designing the materials. In this approach, there are many role of
teacher that will very be useful in teaching learning activity and teacher should pay attention to the roles.
2. Suggestion for the other researcher
For other researchers who conduct the same study, the researcher suggests to implement the designed materials in order to know whether the materials
interesting enough for the students or not and suit to the students’ level.
55
REFERENCES
Agustien, H. I. R. 2004. Language and Language Learning. Singapore: SEAMEO-Regional Language Centre.
Borg and Gall. 1983. Educational Research an Introduction. New York: Longman.
Brown, D. 2004. Language Assessment Principles and Classroom Practices. New York: Longman.
Bushman, J. H. Teaching English Creatively. Springfield: Charles C Thomas. Danarti, D. 2008. 50 Games for Fun. Yogyakarta: Penerbit ANDI.
Hutchinson, T and Waters, A. 1987. English for Specific Purposes: A Learning Centered Approach
. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hornby, A. S. 1995. Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary. London: Oxford
University Press. Kemp, J. E. 1977. Instructional Design: A Plan for Unit and Course
Development . Belmont: Fearon Pitman Publishers USA.
Leo, S. 2006. English for Leisure Time. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Lewis, G. 1999. Games for Children. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Luoma, S. 2004. Assessing Speaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Noar, G. 1953. The Junior High School Today and Tomorrow.
New York: Prentice Hall.
Nunan, D. 1989. Designing Tasks for the Communicative Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. 1997. New Interchange. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Richards, J. 2001. Curriculum Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press. Richard, J. C. and Rodgers, T. 2001. Approaches and Method in Language
Teaching: A Description and Analysis, second edition . Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
