POST DESIGN RESEARCH RESEARCH RESULT AND DISCUSSION
interpreted as ‘strongly disagree’, 2 was ‘disagree’, 3 was ‘undecided’, 4 was ‘agree’, and 5 was ‘strongly agree’.
The following table explained the result of the evaluation given in the post- design survey. The table explained the judgement of the designed materials given by
four participants. Table 4.4: Description of the Data
Participants No.
Statements A
B C
D Mean
1. The
standard competencies
are well
formulated 4
4 4
4 4
2. The indicators are well formulated
4 4
4 5
4.25 3.
The indicators are considered able to support the standard competencies
4 5
4 5
4.5
4. The topics are relevant for D III Perhotelan,
STP-AMPTA 5
5 3
4 4.25
5. The
topics match
with the
standard competencies
4 4
4 4
4
6. The materials are suitable for the students of
D III Perhotelan, STP- AMPTA 4
5 4
4 4.25
7. The teacher’s manual is well presented
4 4
4 5
4.25 8.
The lesson plan is well presented 4
4 3
5 4
9. The syllabus is well presented
4 4
4 5
4.25 10.
The activities are suitable to meet the indicators
4 4
4 5
4.25 56
11. The activities are interesting
4 5
4 4
4.25 12.
The activities in Warm-up are suitable to elicit the topic that will be discussed
4 4
4 5
4.25
13. The conversations in Language Focus match
with the topic discussed 4
4 4
4 4
14. The useful expressions in Language Focus
match with the topic discussed 4
5 5
4 4.5
15. The Grammar Focus and its exercises are
important to help students to improve their grammar.
4 5
4 4
4.25
16. The vocabularies in Word Power match with
the topic discussed 4
5 4
4 4.25
17. The activities in Team Study help students to
practice their understanding about the topic discussed effectifely
4 5
4 4
4.25
Grand Mean 4.22
A : participant 1
C : participant 3
B : participant 2
D: : participant 4
As stated in Chapter III that the grand mean was interpreted as the participants’ attitude toward the designed materials. There were four criteria used :
1 – 1.9 : very bad 2 – 2.9 : bad
3 – 3.9 : enough 4 – 5
: good So, it could be concluded that the materials designed were acceptable because the
grand mean was 4.22 57
Besides giving judgement to the statements related to the materials designed, the participants might state the strengths and weaknesses of the materials and give
suggestion for the materials. In the second part of the questionnaire of the post- design survey, the
participants gave their opinion about the strengths and the weaknesses. The strengths found in the materials designed were:
a. The activities matched with the objectives. b. The role play and games were interesting.
c. The activities were graded. They were started from the easier into the more difficult one.
d. The language skills included in the materials designed were good. There was a weakness found in the materials designed. The weakness was
that the topics included were incomplete. There were some other topics related to English in hotel.
The writer got several suggestions which were useful for the improvement of the materials. The suggestions were:
a. A participant suggested that the writer should rearrange the time allotment in the lesson plan.
b. A participant suggested that the writer should revise the title on the cover, especially change the term ‘Ambarrukmo Palace Tourism Academy’ into
‘Sekolah Tinggi Pariwisata- AMPTA’ c. A participant suggested that the writer should include table of contents in the
materials designed. d. A participant suggested that the writer needed to revise the numbering system in
the teacher’s manual. e. A participant suggested the writer to add the students’ worksheet.
58 PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
f. A participant suggested that the writer needed to state that the materials designed were for 3
rd
semester students of Diploma III Perhotelan, STP- AMPTA. g. A participant found a mistake in the title of the two units. The participant
corrected the spelling of ‘Check in’ and ‘Check out’. They supposed to be ‘Check-in’ and ‘Check-out’.
h. A participant suggested the writer to put other topics or language functions which were possibly needed.
i. A participant suggested the writer to include the meaning of the vocabularies
listed in Word Power in the Answers Key