Modeling The Factors of Teaching Quality in Detail
their own answer and trained them to be an autonomous learner. Meanwhile the group task was also used by the teachers if the tasks were
difficult. The tasks were well organized by the teachers from the simple to more complex one. On the other hand, not all teachers adjusted the tasks
considered to the students’ ability. They gave the same task for all students
without developing different topics for different groups of students. Second, even some teachers were good in practicing this application
stage, some of them did not provide encouragement for the students’ effort
more frequently to low-achieving students. The teachers seemed to be focus on finishing the learning materials at one day without paying more
attention to the students by observing the causes what made students getting low score. However, based on the interview with some students,
they said that the teachers sometimes focused on the result without solving the learning problems at the real teaching situations. The teachers rarely
asked the students how they finished the tasks, whereas it became an important idea in the practice of application tasks than covering all
materials. There were some interesting activities that the teachers did on this
stage. The first, teacher moved to application by grouping students to work
in group and preparing the task to practice strategies presented during modeling. In this case, students were doing observation to the food sellers
at canteen about how to make food or drink. Another activity on application was that teacher asked students to practice interviewing other
friends about their names, address, class, age, hobby, and also dream. By this activity, the students would practice to speak up with their peer. It was
very good to build student – student interaction. This kind of activity was
one of examples of how to make the application stage meaningful for students because they could ask for the information directly to the sellers
and to their peer. The observer also found that almost teachers attempt to engage students on task that they gave in the class. They helped students to
understand either on material or on task. For instance, after students finished doing interview, teacher facilitated discussing the project together
with students. Teacher also provided time on presenting the project in front of class in the following meeting. The second, the teachers used
individual task to practice application stage. The task would provide students to find their own answer and train them to be an autonomous
learner. For instance, teacher gave the different task addressed to different
kinds of students to test about descriptive text. The teacher attempted to check the studen
ts’ knowledge through giving different questions related to the descriptive text. This activity was useful for teacher to evaluate the
teachers ’ teaching practice. The next activity, the teacher conducted the
tasks based on the students’ ability. The teacher gave the different task for
all students in group, and then students were asked for developing the idea on their own group to create the conversation combined with drawing
comic. Based on the interview with some students, they said that when the teachers gave different themes in one activity, it could make the students
understand many aspects in one meeting and also the students could develop their own idea to improve their own mind. The last, in MTsN 32,
the teachers had the program “English Clinic” class that this program was adressed to the low achieving students especially for English subject. This
program aimed at solving the students’ problem when they found difficulty on learning the material in the classroom activity.