Circumstance of Time Analysis of
for ‘a little were HD and AN.
Identification of error
Kinds of errors
Omission
c Analysis on Subjec
Subject word that
‘brother’s ‘a little wave’. Other Subjects who made this kind
were HD and AN.
Identification of error:
Kinds of errors
Analysis guide Errors mad
Omission An item losing which
should be there Subject AB,
HD omitted the ‘a’ which
there
Analysis on Subject BR
Subject BR made omission error because she omitted word that showed a possession. That word was ‘my’ before
‘brother’s house. It belonged to characteristics of recount
Figure 4.74 Subject HD’s recount text part
Figure 4.75 Subject AN’s recount text part
Figure 4.76 Subject AN’s recount text par
this kind of errors
Errors made
Subject AB, AN, and omitted the article
which should be
she omitted the ‘my’ before the
recount text in
part
part
AN’s recount text part
which the who made t
Identification of error
Kinds errors
Omission d
Analysis on Subjec
Subject sign of plurality. I
Identification of error
Kinds of errors
Omission which the writers should use a specific sentence. Other
who made these kinds of error were LN and RD.
Identification of error:
Kinds of errors
Analysis guide Errors made
Omission An item losing which
should be there Subject BR, LN,
omitted word ‘my’ Analysis on Subject RD
Subject RD made omission error by losing the letter‘s’ sign of plurality. It should be ‘two days’ not ‘two day’.
Identification of error:
Kinds of errors
Analysis guide Errors made
Omission An item losing which
should be there Subject RD omitted
‘s’ in the word ‘two da
Figure 4.77 Subject LN’s recount text part
Figure 4.78 Subject RD’s recount text part
Figure 4.79 Subject RD’s recount text part
Other Subjects
Errors made
BR, LN, and RD omitted word ‘my’
the letter‘s’ as a
Errors made
RD omitted letter ‘s’ in the word ‘two days’
part
RD’s recount text part
2 Addition
a Analysis on Subjec
Subject before ‘there’.
meaning in was already enough
Identification of error
Kinds of errors
Addition
b Analysis on Subjec
The the letter which
meaningless. letter ‘l’. These
Subjects who Subject HD. They
Addition Analysis on Subject AB
Subject AB made error addition by giving the word before ‘there’. Based on the meaning, both of the words
meaning in the sentence above. So, by writing only one was already enough and correct.
Identification of error:
Kinds of errors
Analysis guide Errors made
Addition An addition of the same
characteristics element in an utterance
Subject AB used word ‘in’ and ‘the
one meaning
Analysis on Subject HD
The error of Subject HD was laid on the writing. He letter which made the word that he meant was unreadable
meaningless. The word above should be ‘holiday’ without letter ‘l’. These kinds of error also were founded in some
ts who exactly wrote the word ‘holiday’ exactly same Subject HD. They were Subject AF, KK, LN, RD, and BR.
Figure 4.80 Subject AB’s recount text part
Figure 4.81 Subject HD’s recount text part
giving the word ‘in’ words had same
only one of them
Errors made
AB used both and ‘there’ for
writing. He added unreadable and
without double founded in some other
exactly same with re Subject AF, KK, LN, RD, and BR.
HD’s recount text part
Identification of error
Kinds of errors
Addition
c Analysis on Subjec
Subject word ‘one
year’ was happened to
letter ‘s’ for the
Identification of error
Kinds of errors
Addition Identification of error:
Kinds of errors
Analysis guide Errors made
Addition An
item existing
which should not be there
Subject HD, AF, K RD, and BR wrote
‘holiday’ by
double ‘l’ Analysis on Subject AN
Figure 4.82 Subject AN’s recount text part
Subject AN made error addition by adding the letter‘s’ word ‘one year’ that the letter ‘s’ was signed of plurality
year’ was not categorized as plural. An addition of letter happened to Subject WC but in different word. Subject WC
letter ‘s’ for the word ‘holiday’ like the figure 4.81 below.
Identification of error:
Kinds of errors
Analysis guide Errors made
Addition An
item existing
which should not be there
Subject AN added ‘s’ in the word ‘one
and Subject WC letter ‘s’ in the
‘holiday’
Figure 4.83 Subject WC’s recount text part
Errors made
Subject HD, AF, KK, LN, BR wrote word
by giving
AN’s recount text part
the letter‘s’ for plurality but ‘one
of letter ‘s’ also Subject WC added
.81 below.
Errors made
AN added letter word ‘one year’
Subject WC added in the word
ount text part
d Analysis on Subjec
Subject ‘ago’ while
characteristics ‘last week’
Subject DG made. Identification of error
Kinds of errors
Addition
e Analysis on Subjec
Subject The existence
sentence. Analysis on Subject DG
Figure 4.84 Subject DG’s recount text part
Subject DG made an error addition in which he added ‘ago’ while he also used word ‘last’. Both of the words had
characteristics and in that sentence had same meaning. The ‘last week’ usually stood alone without more additional word
ect DG made. Identification of error:
Kinds of errors
Analysis guide Errors made
Addition An
item existing
which should not be there
Subject DG used ‘ago’
and ‘last’
refered to one mea Analysis on Subject MA
Figure 4.85 Subject MA’s recount text part
Subject MA added the word ‘to’ in which it was existence of this word would destroy the meaning
sentence. 78
h he added word words had same
meaning. The word additional word like
Errors made
DG used both and
‘last’ that
refered to one meaning
it was no need. meaning of the
Identification of error
Kinds of errors
Addition
f Analysis on Subjec
Preposition Subject RD
‘u’ for the also made the sentence
Identification of error
Kinds of errors
Addition
3 Misinformation
a Analysis on Subjec
Identification of error:
Kinds of errors
Analysis guide Errors made
Addition An
item existing
which should not be there
Subject MA added ‘to’ after word ‘go to’
Analysis on Subject RD
Preposition ‘for’ usually is used to describe the Subject RD made error addition that was the Subject wrote
for the word ‘for’. This addition made meaning changing also made the sentence’s meaning was also different.
Identification of error:
Kinds of errors
Analysis guide Errors made
Addition An
item existing
which should not be there
Subject RD wrote ‘for’ to describe
with ‘four’
Misinformation Analysis on Subject RD
Figure 4.86 Subject RD’s recount text part
Figure 4.87 Subject RD’s recount text par
Errors made
MA added word ord ‘go to’
describe the length. Subject wrote letter
changing and it
Errors made
RD wrote word describe length
RD’s recount text part
Subject because she u
She wrote Subject RD also made
She s’ for signing
‘three day’s’. Identification of error
Kinds of errors
Misinformation
b Analysis on Subjec
Subject RD made an errors belonged to misinformation because she used number for numerical instead of number of
wrote ‘the two day’, but the right one was ‘the second Subject RD also made other errors like below.
She wrote ‘three’ with ‘tri’ and then she used ‘apostrophe for signing plurality. However, it should be ‘three days’
‘three day’s’. Identification of error:
Kinds of errors
Analysis guide Errors made
Misinformation An error of using
some morpheme or structure form
Subject RD wrote two day’ for
second day’ also wrote ‘three
by ‘tri day’s’
Analysis on Subject KK
Figure 4.88 Subject RD’s recount text part
Figure 4.89 Subject KK’s recount text part
misinformation nstead of number of order.
‘the second day’.
used ‘apostrophe- ‘three days’ not
Errors made
RD wrote ‘the day’ for ‘the
day’ and she wrote ‘three days’
by ‘tri day’s’
xt part
KK’s recount text part
Subject ‘id’. This word was m
it refered to the word Identification of error
Kinds of errors
Misinformation
4 Misordering
a Analysis on Subjec
Subject wrote ‘home
This kind were Subject
Subject AF. Subject US
house’. Subject KK used a term that cannot be understood
‘id’. This word was meaningless, and based on the writer’s analysis it refered to the word ‘of’ or ‘in’.
Identification of error:
Kinds of errors
Analysis guide Errors made
Misinformation An error of using
some morpheme or structure form
Subject KK wrote ‘id’
which ambiguous meani
Misordering Analysis on Subject AF
Subject AF wanted to say ‘grandmother’s home wrote ‘home grandmother’. He made a misordered noun
This kind of errors also happened to some other Subjects, were Subject LN and RD who made this error exactly same
Subject AF. Besides Subject AF, LN, and RD, there was Subject US who made misordered noun phrase for ‘my
Figure 4.91 Subject US’s recount text part Figure 4.90 Subject AF’s recount text part
understood that was based on the writer’s analysis
Errors made
KK wrote word which
had ambiguous meaning
‘grandmother’s home but he misordered noun phrase.
other Subjects, they exactly same with
there was other for ‘my sister
Identification of error
Kinds of errors
Misordering
b Analysis on Subjec
Subject east’. This
the structure WC also ma
She made noun.
Other Subject DG.
Identification of error:
Kinds of errors
Analysis guide Errors made
Misordering An
error in
structuring a good utterance
by appointing a false
morpheme or group morpheme
Subject AF,
LN, misarranged
the phrase
of grandmother’s house’
Subject US misarrange noun phrase ‘my
house’
Analysis on Subject WC
Subject WC made errors by writing ‘East Java’ with east’. This was Noun Phrase which consisted of adjective
structure of it in English and Indonesian was different. WC also made other errors which was similar with the error bef
made misordering Noun Phrase which consisted of
Other Subject who made same errors with Subject Subject DG.
Figure 4.92 Subject WC’s recount text part
Figure 4.93 Subject WC’s recount text part
Errors made
AF, LN,
RD misarranged
the noun
of ‘my
grandmother’s house’ and US misarranged
phrase ‘my sister’s
Java’ with ‘Java adjective in which
different. Subject imilar with the error before.
consisted of noun and
Subject WC was
WC’s recount text part
ount text part
Identification of
Kinds of errors
Misordering
c Analysis on Subjec
Subject particle ‘this’
‘stream’.
Kinds of errors
Misordering Identification of error:
Kinds of errors
Analysis guide Errors made
Misordering An error in structuring
a good utterance by appointing
a false
morpheme or group morpheme
Subject WC wrote East’ for ‘East
She arranged flower’ which should
‘flower garden’; Subject DG who
‘field
football’ ‘football field’
Analysis on Subject DG
Figure 4.95 Subject DG’s recount text part
Subject DG made error in that sentence by ordering particle ‘this’ in the end of sentence. It should be before
Identification of error:
Kinds of errors
Analysis guide Errors made
Misordering An
error in
structuring a good utterance
by appointing
a false
morpheme or group morpheme
Subject DG particle ‘this’ in
position
Figure 4.94 Subject DG’s recount text part
Errors made
WC wrote ‘Java for ‘East Java’;
arranged ‘garden which should be
garden’; and DG who wrote
football’ for
ll field’
DG’s recount text part
by ordering the before the word
Errors made
DG put the ‘this’ in wrong