Past tense Analysis of
1 Omission
a Analysis on Subjec
Subject sentence became
of Subject, especially
element caused sometimes
to some other Subject Omission
Analysis on Subject RD
Subject RD omitted the verb in her sentence that ca sentence became incomplete sentence. A sentence should
Subject, Verb, Object, Adverb. Then, the structure of a especially in English is S V O or S V C. Losing of one
element caused the sentence became ungrammatica sometimes it was hard to be read. This kind of errors also happened
to some other Subjects like Subject AF, MI.
Figure 4.47 Subject RD’s recount text part
Figure 4.48 Subject AF’s recount text part
Figure 4.49 Subject MI’s recount text part
sentence that caused the should consist
structure of a sentence of one of those
ungrammatical and errors also happened
AF’s recount text part
xt part
Identification of error
Kinds of errors
Omission
b Analysis on the
Errors sentence above,
sentence. Other and DG. US
the figure below;
Then, UV below;
Identification of error:
Kinds of errors
Analysis guide Errors made
Omission An item losing which
should be there Subject RD, AF,
omitted an
important element that was
on their sentence Analysis on the Subject SR
Figure 4.50 Subject SR’s recount text part
Errors made by Subject SR were omission of ‘to be’. sentence above, Subject SR should use to be ‘was’ to make
sentence. Other Subjects who made same error were US, UV, DG. US and DG omitted to be ‘was’ for her sentence
the figure below;
Then, UV and WC omitted to be ‘were’ in her sentence
Figure 4.51 Subject US’s recount text part
Figure 4.52 Subject DG’s recount text part
Errors made
RD, AF, and MI an
important that was ‘verb’
on their sentence
SR’s recount text part
of ‘to be’. In the to make correct
were US, UV, WC, sentence like in
er sentence like
US’s recount text part
Identification of
Kinds of errors
Omission
2 Addition
a Analysis on Subjec
Subject verb ‘went’
verb that s Identification of error
Kinds of errors
Addition Identification of error:
Kinds of errors
Analysis guide Errors made
Omission An item losing which
should be there The Subject SR,
UV, WC,
and omitted the to
and ‘were’ Addition
Analysis on Subject AB
Subject AB used two verbs that were actually same. verb ‘went’ was the past tense of ‘go’, so the past tense
verb that should be used. Identification of error:
Kinds of errors
Analysis guide Errors made
Addition An addition of the
same characteristics
element in an utterance Subject AN used
‘went’ and also which had same meaning
Figure 4.53 Subject UV’s recount text part
Figure 4.54 Subject WC’s recount text part
Figure 4.55 Subject SR’s recount text part
Errors made
Subject SR, US, WC,
and DG
the to be ‘was’
actually same. The past tense was the
Errors made
AN used verb and also ‘go’
which had same meaning
b Analysis on Subjec
Subject while he also added wo
Identification of error
Kinds of errors
Addition
c Analysis on Subjec
Subject not necessary.
could be directly who added word
Analysis on Subject IS
Subject IS made addition error in which he used past while he also added word ‘to’.
Identification of error:
Kinds of errors
Analysis guide Errors made
Addition An addition of the
same characteristics
element in an utterance Subject IS added ‘to’
past tense verb
Analysis on Subject RD
Subject RD added word ‘to’ after verb ‘visited’ which necessary. The word ‘visited’ was not followed by ‘to’,
could be directly followed by place. It also happened to who added word ‘to’ after ‘went’.
Figure 4.56 Subject IS’s recount text part
Figure 4.57 Subject RD’s recount text part
used past tense
Errors made
IS added ‘to’ in a verb
‘visited’ which did followed by ‘to’, but it
happened to object IS
IS’s recount text part
Identification of error
Kinds of errors
Addition
3 Misinformation
a Analysis on
Subject ‘very’ with
because it did not m Identification of
Kinds of errors
Misinformation Identification of error:
Kinds of errors
Analysis guide Errors made
Addition An error of adding
some element which is not
necessary and
structurally is wrong Subject RD and
word ‘to’ to the ‘visited’ and ‘went’
Misinformation Analysis on Subject HD
Subject HD did misinformation error by writing ‘very’ with ‘werry’. It caused that word did not have
because it did not make a word. Identification of error:
Kinds of errors
Analysis guide Errors made
Misinformation An error of using some morpheme or
structure form Subject
HD ‘very’ with ‘werry’
Figure 4.58 Subject IS’s recount text part
Figure 4.59 Subject HD’s recount text part
Errors made
RD and IS added ‘to’ to the verbs
nd ‘went’
writing the word not have meaning
Errors made
HD wrote
‘very’ with ‘werry’
HD’s recount text part
b Analysis on Subjec
Subject be’ in present
sentence. Other KK, BR, and LN.
Analysis on Subject MI
Subject MI made misinformation error because he in present form in recount text. It should be ‘were’
sentence. Other Subjects who also made this kind of error KK, BR, and LN.
Figure 4.60 Subject MI’s recount text part
Figure 4.61 Subject KK’s recount text part
Figure 4.62 Subject KK’s recount text part
Figure 4.63 Subject LN’s recount text part
because he used ‘to be ‘were’ in that
kind of error were
MI’s recount text part
KK’s recount text part
LN’s recount text part
Identification of error
Kinds of errors
Misinformation
c Analysis on Subjec
Subject sentence whe
Identification of error
Kinds of errors
Misinformation
d Analysis on Subjec
Subject present tense
Subjects of Identification of error:
Kinds of errors
Analysis guide Errors made
Misinformation An error of using some morpheme or
structure form Subject MI, KK,
and LN used ‘to present
Analysis on Subject on SR
Subject SR used word ‘while’ instead of ‘to be’ sentence where it should be used ‘to be’.
Identification of error:
Kinds of errors
Analysis guide Errors mad
Misinformation An error of using some morpheme or
structure form Subject SR used
‘while’ to represent be’
Analysis on Subject US
Subject US made information error that was present tense instead of past tense in writing recount text.
Subjects of who made this kind of error were BR, AF,
Figure 4.64 Subject RS’s recount text part
Figure 4.65 Subject US’s recount text part
Errors made
MI, KK, BR, used ‘to be’ in
of ‘to be’ in the
Errors made
SR used word to represent ‘to
was she used recount text. Other
BR, AF, AN, UV,
unt text part
WC, HD, past tense in writing rec
Figure
Figure
WC, HD, KK, IS, and SR. Most of them used present tense past tense in writing recount text.
Figure 4.66 Subject UV’s recount text part
Figure 4.67 Subject HD’s recount text part
Figure 4.68 Subject WC’s recount text part
Figure 4.69 Subject IS’s recount text part
Figure 4.70 Subject AN’s recount text part
present tense than
Identification of error
Kinds of errors
Misinformation
4 Misordering
a Analysis on Subjec
Subject A He writes
position. The meaningless.
Identification of error
Kinds of errors
Misordering Identification of error:
Kinds of errors
Analysis guide Errors made
Misinformation An error of using some morpheme or
structure form Subject , AF,
WC, HD, KK, SR used present
when it should tense
Misordering Analysis on Subject AN
Subject AN did misarranging when wrote the word ‘didn’t’. writes ‘did’nt’ in which he put an ‘apostrophe’ in
position. The misarranging of the apostrophe made the meaningless.
Identification of error:
Kinds of errors
Analysis guide Errors made
Misordering An
error in
structuring a good utterance
by appointing a false
morpheme or group morpheme
Subject AN
apostrophe in
position. He
‘did’nt’ instead of ‘didn’t’
Figure 4.71 Subject AN’s recount text part
Errors made
, AF, AN, UV, HD, KK, IS, and
used present tense should use past
the word ‘didn’t’. ‘apostrophe’ in a wrong
made the word
made
AN put
the apostrophe
in wrong
He wrote
stead of ‘didn’t’