Technique of Data Analysis

Scoring Element Scale Quality Description 21-28 Good to Average Effective but simple constructions – minor problems in complex construction – several errors of agreement, tense, number, word orderfunction, articles, pronouns, prepositions but meaning seldom obscured. 17-11 Fair to Poor Major problems in simplecomplex constructions – frequent errors of negation, agreement, tense, number, word orderfunction, articles, pronouns, prepositions andor fragments, run-ons, deletion – meaning confused or obscured. 10-5 Very Poor No mastery of sentence construction rules dominated by errors – does not communicate – not enough to evaluate. Mechanics 5 Excellent to Very Good Effective complex constructions – few errors of agreement, tense, number, word function, articles, pronouns, prepositions. 4 Good to Average Occasional errors of spelling, punctuation, paragraphing, but meaning not obscured. 3 Fair to Poor Frequent errors of spelling, punctuation, capitalization, and paragraphing – poor handwriting – meaning confused or obscured. Scoring Element Scale Quality Description 2 Very Poor No mastery of conventions – dominated by errors of spelling, punctuation, and capitalization – handwriting illegible – OR not enough to evaluate.

I. Statistical Hipothesis

The statistical hypothesis of this research was as follow: H o : µ 1 = µ 2 H a : µ 1 ≠ µ 2 H o : There was no significant difference between students’ achievement in writing narrative text using story mapping and without using story mapping technique. H a : There was a significant difference between students’achievement in writing narrative text by using story mapping strategy and without using story mapping technique. And then, the criteria used as follows: 1. If t-test t o t-table t t in significant degree of 0.05, H o null hypothesis is rejected. It means that the rates of mean score of the post-test are higher than the pre-test.The using of story mapping is effective to teach students’ writing ability of narrative text. 2. If t-test t o t-table t t in significant degree of 0.05, H o the null hypothesis is accepted. It means that the rates of the means score of the post-test are same as or lower than the pre-test. The using of story mapping is not effective to teach students’ writing ability of narrative text.