= 933.72
752.95 =
180.76 = 13.44
c. Determining the standard of deviation from the mean of D =
1 =
13.44 43
1 =
13.44 42
= 13.44
6.48 = 2.07
d. Determining t
o
t-observation, with formula: =
= 27.44
2.07 = 13.25
e. Determining the degree of freedom df, with formula: =
1 = 43 1
= 42 From the result of statistical calculation, it can be seen that the
value of or t
test
is 13.25 and the degree of freedom df is 42. The value of df 42 at the degree of significance 1 or t
table
of df 42 is 2.69.
C. The Interpretation of the Finding
In this subchapter, the writer describes the interpretation of the research finding and summarizes the hypothesis testing. The research is held
to answer the question whether the use of Student Teams-Achievement Divisions STAD technique is effective in teaching reading at the Eight
Grade of the First Semester in SMPN 1 Pakuhaji. To answer the question above, the writer proposes Alternative Hypothesis Ha and Null Hypothesis
Ho as follows: a. Ho Null Hypothesis: there is empirical evidence that the use of
Student Teams-Achievement Divisions STAD technique is not effective in teaching reading at the Eight Grade of the First Semester in
SMPN 1 Pakuhaji. b. Ha Alternative Hypothesis: there is empirical evidence that the use of
Student Teams-Achievement Divisions STAD technique is effective in teaching reading at the Eight Grade of the First Semester in SMPN 1
Pakuhaji. To prove the hypothesis, the data obtained in experimental class are
calculated by using t
test
formula with assumption as follows: a. If
≤ t
table,
in significant degree of 1, the Null Hypothesis Ho is accepted and Ha or Hypothesis Alternative is rejected. It means that
that there is empirical evidence that the use of Student Teams- Achievement Divisions STAD technique is not effective in teaching
reading. b. If
≥ t
table,
in significant degree of 1, the Null Hypothesis Ho is rejected and Ha or Hypothesis Alternative is accepted. It means there is
empirical evidence that the use of Student Teams-Achievement Divisions STAD technique is effective in teaching reading.
According to statistical calculation above, the value of is 13.25, and
the degree of freedom is 42. Then the writer uses 1 as the degree of significance. Based on the significance, it can be seen that on df = 42 in
significance 1 the value of t
table
is 2.69. By comparing the result of t
table
and , in significance 1,
t
table
= 13.25 2.69. It means that the Alternative Hypothesis Ha is accepted and the Null Hypothesis Ho is
rejected. Therefore, it can be inferred that the use of STAD technique effective in teaching recount text. It simply illustrates that the students who are taught
by using STAD technique have a significantly higher achievement in learning recount text at the Eight Grade of the First Semester in SMPN 1
Pakuhaji.
CHAPTER V CONCLUSSION AND SUGGESTION
In this chapter, the writer tries to give the conclusion and suggestions based on the research findings that had been gained after conducting the research.
A. Conclusion
This study is intended to find empirical evidence whether the use of Student Teams-Achievement Divisions
STAD Technique at the Eight Grade of the First Semester in SMPN 1 Pakuhaji is effective in teaching reading of
recount text. In this study, there are 43 students involved and become the sample of this study. Based on the findings presented in chapter IV, it can be
concluded that there is empirical evidence that the use of Student Teams- Achievement Divisions
STAD Technique is effective in teaching reading on first semester of the Eight Grade SMPN 1 Pakuhaji. The students of
experimental class who are taught reading through STAD technique achieve better score in the post-test. It also can be seen in the gain score which
represents the students’ improvement of using this technique. In this case, the students’ improvement score represent the successful of this technique which
makes the students work together, having more confident and motivation, and having responsibility for their own and team success. This finding is proved
through the comparison of t
test
or and t
table
which obtains from the statistical calculation.
B. Suggestion
In line with the conclusion, here are some suggestions that can be given in relations to the writer conclusion, and hopefully anyone who reads
this “skripsi” can take the benefits. The suggestions are as follow: a. English teachers are hoped to develop their creativity in teaching English,
so that the students’ boredom in learning English, especially in reading subject can be avoided.
b. The teacher could try to use STAD as a technique in teaching reading, because in this study it proves that STAD could increase the students’
comprehension in reading. c. The teachers should know the methods in learning and teaching in order to
the teacher can choose the suitable method for the suitable material in the classroom.
d. The students need to realize that learning has two way process, not only teacher-center but also student-center. It means that they have significant
role in achieving their success in study. e. The students should share their difficulty in learning to their friends and
their teacher in order to they can solve their problem in the learning activity.
