The Statistical Hypothesis of the Study

21 22 23 Table 4.2 experimental class addition, the avera modus is 70, and t

B. The Analysis of t 1. Data Testing

Before research, a test the data are di These tests a normality and hom

a. Normality of

The Kolmogorov absolute di N Normal Pa Most Extre Kolmogoro Asymp. Si a. Test dis b. Calculat 21 80 ∑ 22 55 Mean 23 70 4.2 presents the students score in the post lass, the highest score is 100 and the lowest verage score or mean in the experimental class is nd the median is 70. f the Data ng re calculating the t test value to examine the hy test of normality and homogeneity are needed to distributed normally, and whether the data are s are analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics V nd homogeneity tests results can be seen as below ality of the Test Pre-test and Post-test Table 4.3 Normality of the Test The normality calculation above uses ogorov-Smirnov Test. The table above shows difference D of the pre-test or D pre-test . The One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test NilaiPreTes 4 Parameters a,b Mean 40.0 Std. Deviation 13.67 treme Differences Absolute .14 Positive .14 Negative -.07 orov-Smirnov Z .97 Sig. 2-tailed .30 istribution is Normal. lated from data. 2900 67.44 post-test. In the st score is 45. In ss is 67.44, then the hypothesis of the d to know whether are homogeneous. s Version 20. The s below: uses One-Sample shows 0.148 as the Then, it can get a t Test NilaiPostTest 43 43 0.00 67.44 .671 13.644 .148 .109 .148 .098 .078 -.109 .970 .716 .303 .684 point that D table with the closest Kolmogorov-Smirnov critical points of 45 is 0.198. Therefore the comparison of the D pre-test D table is 0.148 0.198. In other hand, the absolute difference D of post-test class is 0.109, it is also less than D table of critical point 45 = 0.198 or D post-test D table 0.120 0.224. In finding the normality, it can be referred to Z pre-test = 0.970 p 0.05 and Z post-test = 0.716 p 0.05. Therefore, it can get a conclusion that both data of the test in the experimental class is normal.

b. Homogeneity of the Test Pre-test and Post-test Table 4.4

Homogeneity of the Pre-test Test of Homogeneity of Variance Levene Statistic df1 df2 Sig. Nilai Based on Mean .237 1 84 .628 Based on Median .139 1 84 .710 Based on Median and with adjusted df .139 1 83.689 .710 Based on trimmed mean .238 1 84 .627 In table 4.4, we know that the degree of significance of the mean of the post-test is 0.628 which bigger than the critical point of 0.05. Based on that finding, in can be summarized that both pre-test and post-test in the experimental class are also homogenous not heterogeneous.

2. Hypothesis Testing

The writer uses t test formula to find the empirical evidence statistically and to make the testing of hypothesis in this research. In the t test, the writer uses manual calculation. After getting the data; the results of students reading comprehension achievement of 8E class, X is the students’ pre-test score in the experimental class, and Y is the students’

Dokumen yang terkait

Teaching simple present tense through student teams-achievement divisions

1 10 66

The Effectiveness Of Student Teams-Achievement Divisions (Stad) Technique On Students’ Reading Comprehension (A Quasi Experimental Study At Second Grade Students Of Smp Islam Ruhama Ciputat)

1 8 168

The Effectiveness Of Using The Student Teams Achievement Divisions (STAD) Technique Towards Students’ Understanding Of The Simple Past Tense (A Quasi-Experimental Study at the Eighth Grade Students of SMP Trimulia, Jakarta Selatan)

1 8 117

The effectiveness of using student teams achievement division (stad) technique in teaching direct and indirect speech of statement (A quasi experimental study at the eleventh grade of Jam'iyyah Islamiyyah Islamic Senior high scholl Cege)

3 5 90

Penerapan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Student Teams Achievement Divisions (STAD) dalam meningkatkan hasil belajar akidah akhlak: penelitian tindakan kelas di MA Nihayatul Amal Karawang

0 10 156

The Effectiveness Of Using Student Teams achievejvient Divisions (Stad) Techniques In Teaching Reading

0 23 103

Applying Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) Technique to Improve Students’ Reading Comprehension in Discussion Text. (A Classroom Action Research in the Third Grade of SMA Fatahillah Jakarta)

5 42 142

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF STUDENT TEAMS ACHIEVEMENT DIVISIONS (STAD) METHOD TO TEACH READING VIEWED FROM STUDENTS MOTIVATION

0 4 161

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TEACHING READING USING STUDENTS TEAMS ACHIEVEMENT DIVISIONS (STAD) THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TEACHING READING USING STUDENTS TEAMS ACHIEVEMENT DIVISIONS (STAD) FOR THE FIRST YEAR OF SMA N 2 SUKOHARJO.

0 0 13

INTRODUCTION THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TEACHING READING USING STUDENTS TEAMS ACHIEVEMENT DIVISIONS (STAD) FOR THE FIRST YEAR OF SMA N 2 SUKOHARJO.

0 0 6