25
3.1.5 Main Product Revision
The next step adapted from educational research and development was revising the instructional materials. The result of the evaluation was to find out
whether the designed materials were appropriate or not.
3.2 The Research Participants
The participants of this research are twenty five first grade students and one of English teacher of SMK Paramitha 2. The designed materials which are
enclosed in the questionnaires were distributed to the students and the teacher will have an interview
.
3.3 The Research Instruments
The instruments which were used to gather the data was questionnaires and interview questions. The questionnaires consist of eight questions. The five
questions are closed form questions and the three questions are open form questions. The interview questions consist of twelve questions. In closed form
question, the responses of the questions are already available. The closed questions require the participants to choose one of the available responses, except
in the number four and five. The students should put the responses in the right order. On the other hand, the open form questions require the participants to give
responses in their own words. The five questions should be answered by the teacher and will be recorded.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
26
3.4 Data Gathering Technique
To make the design material for the first grade students of SMK Paramitha 2
were addressed in Central Jakarta, the data were gathered on May 2011 by distributing questionnaires to one class of first grade students of SMK Paramitha
2 and interviewing one of the English teachers of SMK Paramitha 2. The students
are asked to answered the questions on the questionnaires and the teacher is asked to answered the questions were given. The results of questionnaires and interview
will be combined as a based to design the speaking materials. After the material designed, it will be evaluated by one of English conversation instructor for hotel
staff, two teachers from SMK Paramitha 2, and the two of lecturers from Sanata Dharma University.
3.5 Data Analysis Technique
The data analysis from the library study and survey study would be analyzed in different way. The data obtained from the library study were analyzed
in the form of description. The data were gained from several resource books. The data from research survey would be analyzed in the form of
percentage. The researcher analyzed the data as the data needed have been gathered. The participants’ opinions in the form of closed questions were shown
statistically. The participants’ opinions in the form of open questions were shown in sentences.
In analyzing the pre-design survey and post-design questionnaires, the data collected would be calculated using percentage as follow:
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
27
Note: m
= the total number of the students who choose certain answer n
= the total number of the students In post-design survey questionnaires, there will be a mean. The formula to
measure the mean of the data collected would be calculated as follow:
Note: ∑: Sum
i: point of agreements, 1 until 4 Xi: score for the i data
Fi: the number of respondents who choose certain answer n: the totals of data X
N: the total number of the respondents The data obtained trough questionnaires is in the form of scores. There are four
agreements are applied as follows:
Table 2. Points of Agreements Points of Agreements
Scores
Strongly disagree 1
Disagree 2 Agree 3
Strongly agree 4
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
28
3.6 Research Procedure
Kategori