53 designed by the writer could be used for learning materials for the eleventh grade
students of senior high school. In the questionnaire, the writer also had four questions. The questions were
to ask the evaluators‟ opinion of the general comments, the weaknesses, the strengths, and the suggestions on the designed materials. T
he evaluators‟ opinions are presented on the following explanation on Table 4.6, 4.7, 4.8, and 4.9.
c. The Evaluators’ General Comments on the Designed Materials.
The evaluators provided comments generally on the questionnaire and the comments were provided on table 4.6
Table 4.6: General Comments on the Designed Materials
Evaluators General Comments
Evaluator A
The materials give the opportunity to the students to practice speaking in front of the class.
The materials are related to the school based curriculum.
Evaluator B
The designed materials are good to help students to learn speaking.
It can help the students to arrange idea for their speaking materials. Evaluator C
The materials are interesting enough.
The materials given can help students to improve their speaking
ability. Evaluator D
This is very good designed materials for the eleventh grade students.
This design can build students‟ interest in learning speaking.
Evaluator E
It is a new way to teach speaking with mind mapping.
This design will help students to remember their idea.
d. The Evaluators’ Opinion of the Weaknesses on the Designed Materials
In designing those materials, the writer still had some mistakes. In order to know about the writer‟s weaknesses in designing the materials, there were some
opinions from the evaluators. Table 4.7 provides evaluators‟ opinion of the
weaknesses on the designed materials. PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
54
Table 4.7: The Weaknesses on the Designed Materials
Evaluators Weaknesses
Evaluator A
The designed materials are lack of example.
Evaluator B
It will be difficult to teach them about speaking skill since this is the
first time for students to learn speaking. Evaluator C
It will take a long time for students to make a mind map in every
meeting.
Some instructions use high language focus. Evaluator D
There are some high vocabularies that can make students difficult to
understand.
There are many grammatical mistakes on the designed materials.
Evaluator E
Mind mapping is a new media for students and it will take a long
time for students to adapt this media in their learning activities especially in speaking.
e. The Evaluators’ Opinion of the Strengths on the Designed Materials.
In the open-ended questionnaires, the writer asked about the strengths on the designed materials. The evaluators wrote the strengths of the designed
materials in the questionnaire. The results of the evaluators‟ opinion are provided on Table 4.8.
Table 4.8: The Strengths on the Designed Materials
Evaluators Strengths
Evaluator A
The themes build the students to focus on the topic.
It can make students easier to remember their idea. Evaluator B
The materials are easy to understand for the eleventh grade
students of SMA N 1 Ngaglik.
Mind mapping is able to organize the students‟ thinking to write the big idea.
Evaluator C
The layout is easy to read.
The designed materials are full colored. Evaluator D
The designed materials have an interesting topic.
Mind mapping is going to help students make the outline of their
materials of speaking. Evaluator E
The designed materials provide some well-ordered mind mappings.
The designed materials sharpen the students‟ understanding on the
content.
