50 The materials were selected based on school based curriculum which is
KTSP Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. The writer designed eight materials because it they were enough for speaking materials in semester 2.
After finishing the eight materials for the designed materials, then the writer looked for evaluators and asked about the designed materials. The further
explanation will be discussed in the next part.
8. Evaluating the Designed Materials
After designing the materials, the writer distributed the questionnaire to the evaluators to find out the opinion and suggestion on the designed materials.
Questionnaires were aimed to get feedback to improve the materials. Those included the designed materials, the syllabus, and the example of the lesson plan.
The questionnaires were distributed to five evaluators on May 2
nd
2016 and May 14
th
, 2016 and were collected a week after. Questionnaires consisted of fifteen statements in close-ended questionnaire and four questions in open-ended
questionnaire. See appendix D.
a. The Description of the Evaluators
The evaluators were three English teachers of SMA N 1 Ngaglik and two lecturers of English Language Education Study Program ELESP of Sanata
Dharma University. The evaluators gave judgments whether the proposed of a set of instructional materials was accepted or not. The table below describes the
evaluators ‟ background of the post designed survey.
51
Table 4.4: The result of pre-design survey
Evaluators Educational Background
Teaching Experience in Years
S1 S2
S3 Other
5 5-10
10-15 15
Teacher A
Teacher B
Teacher C
Lecture A
Lecture B
This table shows about the educational background and the teaching experience of each evaluator. It shows that all of the evaluator had teaching
experience more than 5 years and it proved that they had experienced about teaching and how to solve some problems regarding to the students need. The
educational backgrounds from all of the evaluators were good. One of the evaluators had bachelor degree, three of the evaluators had master degree, and one
of the evaluators had doctoral degree. It meant that they could give some suggestions, opinions, and criticism toward the writer‟s designed materials.
b. The Data Presentation of the Result
There were two kinds of data to be presented in this section, since the questionnaires which are distributed consisted of closed-form and open-form
items. The first data presented in form of level of agreements as closed-form items. The number and degree of agreement are described as follows.
1= Strongly Disagree 2= Disagree
3= Agree 4= Strongly Agree
