64
CHAPTER V CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION
After finishing the whole steps of this Classroom Action Research CAR study, it can be drawn some conclusions considering the result of this research.
Furthermore, related to the conclusion, there are also some suggestions given.
A. Conclusion
This subtitle presents the answer of the questions which have written at the formulation of problem in the previous chapter. Based on the result of the research
that was conducted in the XII
th
grade students of science class at SMA Fatahillah in academic year 20142015, it can be drawn conclusions as follows:
1. The students could improve their reading comprehension of discussion text through Students Team Achievement Division STAD technique in two
cycles. 2.
The students’ score in reading comprehension of discussion text improve significantly through STAD technique. The data showed 86.66 of the
students in the class passed the KKM which was used as indicator of students’
success. In short, the score of students’ quality in learning reading have good
level.
B. Suggestion
Based on the conclusion above, it can be delivered some suggestions, go to: 1. The teacher, STAD technique
would be helpful to develop students’ reading comprehension in learning discussion text. Therefore, the teacher needs to
maintain using STAD technique in the next new academic year in teaching discussion text and another type of texts.
2. The suggestion for students is about the activeness of the students during the reading lesson. They must actively involve in the lesson, so they know what
they learn and how to implement what they have learn.
3. The suggestion for students and teacher is by using STAD technique teacher can manage the class efficiently. Since within the class there are students
which has high, average and low performer, STAD technique can facilitate all students to learn cooperatively. The high level performers will facilitate the
average and lo w student’ performers. As a result the role of teacher in the
class is not too dominant, and the students will not only depend on teacher’s
hand but also more depend on their effort in discussing particular material.
66
REFERENCES
Anderson, Mark and Kathy Anderson. Text Types in English 1. South Yarra: Macmillan, 2003.
Arikunto, Suharsimi. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara, 2012.
Bamman, Henry A. Fundamental Of Basic Reading Instruction. United States of America: David MC Kay Company, Inc., 1967.
Bond, Guy L and Eva Wagner. Teaching Child to Read. New York: The MacMillan Company, 1969.
Caro, Manuel J. and John W. Murphy. The World of Quantum Culture. Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group. Inc., 2002.
Celce-Murcia, Marianne eds., Teaching English as A Second or Foreign Language.
United States of America: Heinle Heinle Publisher, 1991. Closs, Ellen K. Teaching Reading Comprehension to Struggling and at Risk
Reader: Strategies That Work. in The Reading Teacher. Nov, 2004. Cottom, Daniel. Text and Culture: The Politics of Interpretation. Minneapolis:
The University of Minnesota Press, 1989. Creswell, John W. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating
Quantitative and Qualitative Research 4
th
ed. Boston: Pearson Education,
Inc., 2012. Creswell, John W. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed
Method Approaches 4
th
edition. California: Sage Publication, Inc., 2014.
Finocchiaro, Mary and Michael Bonomo, The Foreign Language Learning; A Quide for Teachers
, New York: Regents Publishing Company, Inc., 1973. Greallet, Francois. Developing Reading Skill. Cambridge University Press, 1981.
Hadyan, Rifki. “The Implementation of the Cooperative Learning Method in
Teaching Reading Comprehension ”, Thesis on English Education Study
Program of Indonesia University of Education: 2013. Unpublished.
Kategori