The Understanding of Cooperative Learning.

D. Students Teams Achievement Division STAD Technique.

1. Understanding of Students Teams Achievement Division STAD Technique.

Students Teams Achievement Division STAD is one of the set of instructional technique developed and researched by Slavin at Johns Hopkins University. Slavin stated in his book, ―Two of the oldest and most extensively researched forms of cooperative learning are Students Teams Achievement Division and Team-Games- Tounament.‖ 27 STAD technique is based on the idea of having students work in cooperative learning teams to learn academic objectives. However, this technique emphasizes the use of team goals and team success, which can only be achieved if all members of the team learn the objectives being taught. In other word, in Students Team Learning, the students‘ tasks are not to do something as a team, but to learn something as a team, where the team‘s work is not done until all team members have mastered the material being studied. STAD is also the simplest cooperative learning methods, and the most appropriate method for teachers who want to apply the Cooperative Learning for the first time in their teaching-learning activities. STAD is one of the simplest of all cooperative learning methods, and is a good model to begin with for teachers who are new to the cooperative approach. 28 According to many teaching researches, it is very appropriate in teaching many subjects than other cooperative learning methods and can be used for every level education. Shlomo Sharan writes, ―It is also very adaptable, it has been used in mathematics, science, social studies, English, industrial arts, and many other subjects, and at levels from 2 nd grade to college.‖ 29 27 Robert E. Slavin, Cooperative Learning Theory, Reasearch, and Practice, Second Edition, Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon, 1990, p. 71. 28 Ibid., p. 71. 29 Shlomo Sharan, Handbook of Cooperative Learning Methods, Westport: Preager Publisher, 1994, p. 4. STAD expects students learn together with other team mates in a small team to study the subject that is presented. Shlomo Sharan states, ―These techniques are based on the idea of having students work in cooperative learning teams to learn academic objectives.‖ 30 The smartest students are expected to teach the lowest students until they understand and master the subject that is presented. They not only study to answer the task correctly but also study how to make all the group members understand and master the subject so all the group members can answer the task correctly. The students‘ task are not to do something as a team, but to learn something as a team, where the team‘s work isn‘t done until all team members have mastered the material being studied. 31 This is done because they are not allowed helping each other in answering quizzes although they study together as a team. In STAD, students are assigned to four-member learning teams that are mixed in performance level, sex and ethnicity. 32 Students are divided into small groups consist of four to five members. The groups must be totally heterogeneous. The groups are mixed in high, average, and low levels, boys and girls, different ethnicity, and different religion. Do not allow students choose their own teams, because they will prefer to choose others like themselves. There are three concepts in Student Teams-Achievement Divisions STAD technique; a. Team Rewards Team rewards means that teams are not in competition with one another for limited rewards. All of the teams, some of them, or none of them may earn whatever rewards are made available depending on how well the team‗s performance matches a predetermined standard. b. Individual accountability Individual accountability means that students have their own responsibility, because their team success is depended on individual score when they get quizzes. 30 Ibid., p. 1. 31 Ibid., p. 3. 32 Ibid., p. 4.

Dokumen yang terkait

Improving Students' Reading Comprehension of Report Text through SQ3R Technique (A Classroom Action Research at the Eleventh Grade Students of SMAN 1 Parung))

0 7 145

Comparing The Effectiveness Of Using Jigsaw Technique And Students Team Achievement Divisions Technique In Enhancing Students’ Reading Comprehension (A Quasi Experimental Research At Second Grade Students Of Mts Salafiyah Depok)

2 44 148

The Effectiveness Of Using Student Teams-Achievement Divisions (STAD) Techniques in Teaching Reading

1 16 116

The Effectiveness Of Student Teams-Achievement Divisions (Stad) Technique On Students’ Reading Comprehension (A Quasi Experimental Study At Second Grade Students Of Smp Islam Ruhama Ciputat)

1 8 168

The Effectiveness Of Using The Student Teams Achievement Divisions (STAD) Technique Towards Students’ Understanding Of The Simple Past Tense (A Quasi-Experimental Study at the Eighth Grade Students of SMP Trimulia, Jakarta Selatan)

1 8 117

Improvingstudents’ Reading Comprehension Of Narrative Text Through Jigsaw Technique (A Classroomaction Researchin The Second Grade Students Of Smp Ash-Sholihin Kebon Jeruk)

0 11 99

The Effectiveness of Using Jigsaw Technique to Develop Students’ Reading Comprehension on Narrative Text; A Quasi Experimental Study at the Eleventh Grade Students of SMA Negeri 63 Jakarta Selatan

0 6 139

The effectiveness of using student teams achievement division (stad) technique in teaching direct and indirect speech of statement (A quasi experimental study at the eleventh grade of Jam'iyyah Islamiyyah Islamic Senior high scholl Cege)

3 5 90

Improving student's reading comprehention of narrative text through story mapping (a classroom action research at eight grade students of SMP PGRI 2 Ciputat)

0 17 0

EMPLOYING QUESTION – ANSWER RELATIONSHIPS (QAR) STRATEGY TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION (A Classroom Action Research at the Eleventh Year Students of SMA Negeri 1 Rangkasbitung in 2012/2013 Academic Year)

5 22 256