collaborator satisfied because of their score result was good. Furthermore, the students could response the writers’ command easily and they enthusiastic
and enjoyed during teaching and learning process. Based
on the students’ score from pretest to post test 2 there was a good achievement that was achieved by the students. There were 32 students
or 86.48 who achieved the Minimum Mastery Criterion- Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal KKM. After achieving the target reserach of where
minimally 75 who passed the Minimum Mastery Criterion- Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal KKM, so that the writer and observer decided stop the
Classroom Action Research CAR. The writer and the observer concluded that the total physical response TPR could improve students’ ability in using
imperative sentences.
4. Findings after Implementing the Classroom Action Research CAR
a. Result of Post Interview
After implementing total physical response TPR method, the writer carried out the interview with the teacher. It was conducted on Friday,
February 18th 2011. After finishing cycle 2. It started at 10.00 A.M and finished at 10.30 A.M. The writer wanted to know the teacher opinion about
total physical response TPR method in teaching learning process of imperative sentences. In this case, the writer divided three categories
questions in the interview. There were the students’ condition in teaching and learning process of imperaive sentences in the classroom, the method that was
use in the classroom, and teachers’ opinion about total physical response.
First category was the students’ condition in teaching and learning process of imperative sentences in the classroom , t
eacher said that students’ condition was good, anthusiastic in getting material, and had motivation for
speaking English. Next, the s tudents’ participation was good enough in
learning imperative sentences because they usually speak English in teaching learning English process. Finally, the students more happy and active in
learning imperative sentences, they were not bore. See appendix 2b, items number 1, 2, and 3 of interview
