B. Total Physical Response TPR
1. Definition of TPR
According  to  Richard  and  Rodgers  in  their  book,  total  physical response TPR is  a language teaching method built around the coordination
of speech and action; it attempts to teach   language through physical motor activity.  Developed  by  James  Asher,  a  professor  of  psychology  at  San  Jose
State  University,  California,  it  draws  on  several  traditions,  including developmental  psychology,  learning  theory,  and  humanistic  pedagogy,  as
well  as  on  language  teaching  procedures  proposed  by  Harold  and  Dorothy Palmer in 1925.
24
“Total physical response method was developed in order to reduce  the  stress  people  feel  when  studying  foreign  languages  and  thereby
encourage  students  to  persist  in  their  study  beyond  a  beginning  level  of proficiency
”.
25
Furthermore “many  people  believe  that  total  physical  response  is
only  appropriate  for  children  since  the  method  relies  on  imperatives. However,  Ashers  believe  that  the  method  can  be  used  to  teach  any  foreign
language not only to children but also adults ”.
26
On the basis of his research, “Asher reasoned that the fastest, least stressful way to achieve understanding
of  any  target  language  is  to  follow  directions  uttered  by  the  instructor without  native  language  translation
”.
27
“Total  physical  response  TPR consists basically  of obeying commands  given by  the instructor that involve
on overt physical response. The instructor, for example, says “stand up” and
the  classes  stand  up.  The  commands  become  more  complex  as  the  class
24
Jack  C.  Richard  and  Theodore  S.  Rodgers, Approaches’  and  Methods  in  Language
Teaching, Cambridge: Cambridge University, 1992, p. 87.
25
Diane Larsen Freeman, Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching, New York: Oxford University Press, 2000, p. 113.
26
Ag. Bambang Setiyadi, Teaching English as a Foreign Language, Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2006, p. 126.
27
Diane Larsen Freeman, Techniques and Principles …, p. 108.
progresses, and Ashers claims that it quite possible to embed vast amounts of syntax into the form of a command
”.
28
From the definition above, the writer has opinion about total physical response;  this  method  involves  physical  activity  in  act  the  verb  in  using
imperative sentences. Total physical response help the students improve their ability  in  imperative  sentences  because  the  students  enjoy  in  teaching  and
learning process in the classroom.
2. Approach of Total Physical Response
a. Theory of Language
Asher  does  not  directly  discuss  the  nature  of  language  or  how languages  are  organized.  However,  the  labeling  and  ordering  of  TPR
classroom  drills  seem  to  be  built  on  assumptions  that  owe  much  to structuralist or grammar-based views of language. Asher states that most of
the grammatical structure of the target language and hundreds of vocabulary items can be learned from the skillful use of the imperative by the instructor
1977:  4.  He  views  the  verb  and  particularly  the  verb  in  the  imperative,  as the  central  linguistic  motif  around  which  language  use  and  learning  are
organized.  Despite  Ashers  belief  in  the  central  role  of  comprehension  in language  learning,  he  does  not  elaborate  on  the  relation  between
comprehension, production, and communication he has no theory of speech acts  or  their  equivalents,  for  example,  although  in  advanced  TPR  lessons
imperatives are used to initiate different speech acts, such as requests John, ask Mary to walk to the door, and apologies Ned, tell Jack youre sorry.
29
28
Stephen  D.  Krashen,  Principles  and  Practice  in  Second  Language  Acquisition, Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1982, p. 140.
29
Jack C. Richard and Theodore S. Rodgers, Approaches’ and Methods …, p. 88.