The writer can conclude that students’ response about total physical
response was positive or 87.02 based on the result of questionnaire. The following was the table of students’ post questionnaire result:
Table 4.1 The Students’ Result of Post Questionnaire
Students’ NumberItems
Number Q1
Q2 Q3
Q4 Q5
Q6 Q7
Q8 Q9
Q10
S1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 S2
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
S3 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 S4
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
S5 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 S6
1 1
1 1
1 S7
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 S8
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
S9 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 S10
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
S11 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 S12
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
S13 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
S14 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 S15
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 S16
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
S17 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
S18 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 S19
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
S20 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
S21 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
S22 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1
S23 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
S24 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 S25
1 1
1 1
1 1
S26 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 S27
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
S28 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 S29
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
S30 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 S31
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
S32 1
1 1
1 1
1 S33
1 1
1 1
1 S34
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
S35 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
S36 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 S37
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
The total
number of
students who selected “Yes”
answer 37
36 28
36 33
33 34
28 30
27
Percentage 100
97.29 75.67
97.29 89.18
89.18 91.89
75.67 81.08
72.97
c. Result of Post Test
Before the students carried the test, the writer had done the trustworthiness of the test using discriminating power and difficulty item
among pretest 1, posttest 1, pretest 2 and post test 2. It was found that there consisted of seven items should be revised for pre test and post test in cycle
1 and one item in cycle 2. Furthermore, the writer inputted the result of data including
pretest and post test in cycle 1 into a table as following:
Table 4.2 The Students’ Score of Pretest and Posttest I
No Students’ Number
Pre-Test Post-Test I
1 S1
70 80
2 S2
50 50
3 S3
80 100
4 S4
60 80
5 S5
50 60
6 S6
60 80
7 S7
50 50
8 S8
60 80
9 S9
60 90
10 S10
40 70
11 S11
10 80
12 S12
30 70
13 S13
30 80
14 S14
10 40
15 S15
40 90
16 S16
10 30
17 S17
60 70
18 S18
90 90
19 S19
30 80
20 S20
60 60
21 S21
30 60
22 S22
60 70
23 S23
60 70
24 S24
60 60
25 S25
10 70
26 S26
60 80
27 S27
70 60
28 S28
60 90
29 S29
40 60
30 S30
10 30
31 S31
60 90
32 S32
60 90
33 S33
60 70
34 S34
30 70
35 S35
80 70
36 S36
50 80
37 S37
30 80
Mean 48.10
71.08 The student who passed the Minimum Mastery Criterion- Kriteria Ketuntasan
Minimal KKM 65 Then, the writer inputted the result of pretest and post test in cycle
2 into a table as following:
Table 4.3 The Students’ Score of Pretest and Posttest II
No Students’ Number
Pre-Test Post-Test II
1 S1
70 92
2 S2
30 92
3 S3
50 90
4 S4
60 83
5 S5
60 65
6 S6
60 75
7 S7
30 60
8 S8
50 65
9 S9
50 65
10 S10
40 60
11 S11
70 100
12 S12
50 65
13 S13
50 66
14 S14
50 65
15 S15
50 65
16 S16
50 65
17 S17
70 92
18 S18
50 92
19 S19
50 65
20 S20
50 65
21 S21
50 65
22 S22
30 75
23 S23
60 66
24 S24
30 60
25 S25
40 66
26 S26
70 92
27 S27
30 92
28 S28
50 90
29 S29
40 75
30 S30
40 60
31 S31
50 92
32 S32
70 70
33 S33
30 60
34 S34
50 65
35 S35
60 92
36 S36
60 92
37 S37
60 65
Mean 50.27
74.70 The student who passed the Minimum Mastery Criterion- Kriteria Ketuntasan
Minimal KKM 65