Result of Post Questionnare

The writer can conclude that students’ response about total physical response was positive or 87.02 based on the result of questionnaire. The following was the table of students’ post questionnaire result: Table 4.1 The Students’ Result of Post Questionnaire Students’ NumberItems Number Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q9 Q10 S1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 S2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 S3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 S4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 S5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 S6 1 1 1 1 1 S7 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 S8 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 S9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 S10 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 S11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 S12 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 S13 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 S14 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 S15 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 S16 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 S17 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 S18 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 S19 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 S20 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 S21 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 S22 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 S23 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 S24 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 S25 1 1 1 1 1 1 S26 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 S27 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 S28 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 S29 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 S30 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 S31 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 S32 1 1 1 1 1 1 S33 1 1 1 1 1 S34 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 S35 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 S36 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 S37 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 The total number of students who selected “Yes” answer 37 36 28 36 33 33 34 28 30 27 Percentage 100 97.29 75.67 97.29 89.18 89.18 91.89 75.67 81.08 72.97

c. Result of Post Test

Before the students carried the test, the writer had done the trustworthiness of the test using discriminating power and difficulty item among pretest 1, posttest 1, pretest 2 and post test 2. It was found that there consisted of seven items should be revised for pre test and post test in cycle 1 and one item in cycle 2. Furthermore, the writer inputted the result of data including pretest and post test in cycle 1 into a table as following: Table 4.2 The Students’ Score of Pretest and Posttest I No Students’ Number Pre-Test Post-Test I 1 S1 70 80 2 S2 50 50 3 S3 80 100 4 S4 60 80 5 S5 50 60 6 S6 60 80 7 S7 50 50 8 S8 60 80 9 S9 60 90 10 S10 40 70 11 S11 10 80 12 S12 30 70 13 S13 30 80 14 S14 10 40 15 S15 40 90 16 S16 10 30 17 S17 60 70 18 S18 90 90 19 S19 30 80 20 S20 60 60 21 S21 30 60 22 S22 60 70 23 S23 60 70 24 S24 60 60 25 S25 10 70 26 S26 60 80 27 S27 70 60 28 S28 60 90 29 S29 40 60 30 S30 10 30 31 S31 60 90 32 S32 60 90 33 S33 60 70 34 S34 30 70 35 S35 80 70 36 S36 50 80 37 S37 30 80 Mean 48.10 71.08 The student who passed the Minimum Mastery Criterion- Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal KKM 65 Then, the writer inputted the result of pretest and post test in cycle 2 into a table as following: Table 4.3 The Students’ Score of Pretest and Posttest II No Students’ Number Pre-Test Post-Test II 1 S1 70 92 2 S2 30 92 3 S3 50 90 4 S4 60 83 5 S5 60 65 6 S6 60 75 7 S7 30 60 8 S8 50 65 9 S9 50 65 10 S10 40 60 11 S11 70 100 12 S12 50 65 13 S13 50 66 14 S14 50 65 15 S15 50 65 16 S16 50 65 17 S17 70 92 18 S18 50 92 19 S19 50 65 20 S20 50 65 21 S21 50 65 22 S22 30 75 23 S23 60 66 24 S24 30 60 25 S25 40 66 26 S26 70 92 27 S27 30 92 28 S28 50 90 29 S29 40 75 30 S30 40 60 31 S31 50 92 32 S32 70 70 33 S33 30 60 34 S34 50 65 35 S35 60 92 36 S36 60 92 37 S37 60 65 Mean 50.27 74.70 The student who passed the Minimum Mastery Criterion- Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal KKM 65