Internally assessed coursework

3.2 Internally assessed coursework

Internally assessed coursework refers to any coursework component specified by a Cambridge International syllabus that is assessed in the centre and moderated by us.

Examples include speaking coursework, speaking and listening coursework, projects, folios of essays, field work, art and craft items, design studies, practical work, assignments, and experiments undertaken and assessed during the course.

The syllabus booklet sets out the assessment method for each component and states whether a component is assessed internally. It also gives details of the marking criteria.

Coursework may include work where the theme, experiment or parameters of a project have been set by the teacher, specified in the syllabus or chosen by the candidates.

Coursework options are not available to private candidates. For more information please refer to the relevant syllabus and the Cambridge Guide to Making Entries, which is available from the ‘Support Materials’ section of

CIE Direct. You must submit marks for all candidates entered for internally assessed coursework components and the work

of a sample of candidates. See sections 3.5 and 3.6 for guidance.

3.2.1 Authenticating coursework

to appropriately reference published materials according to their level of study

We need to be confident that the work is the candidate’s own before we can award a grade. Therefore

(iii) make sure work is completed in line with syllabus you must confirm that the work you submit on behalf

requirements and can be assessed against the of a candidate is entirely the candidate’s own and

criteria.

original work. By submitting the coursework marks (c) Coursework must be a candidate’s own, unaided for the candidate you confirm that the work for which

work. Unless there is subject-specific guidance that each mark has been given is solely that of the candidate

says otherwise, teachers can support candidates concerned and was conducted under the conditions

by reviewing their work before it is handed in for required by the syllabus. If you cannot confirm that this

final assessment. They can do this orally or through is the case, you must not submit the work.

written feedback. Their advice should be kept at a general level so that the student leads the discussion

3.2.2 Supervising coursework

and makes the suggestions for any amendments. (a) We do not expect candidates to undertake

Teachers must not give detailed advice to individual coursework without guidance and continuing

students or groups of students on how their work teacher supervision. Teachers may:

can be improved to meet the assessment criteria. (i) assist with the choice of subjects for

(d) Teachers must record full details of the investigations, models and topics

nature of any assistance given to individual (ii) indicate sources of information, for example,

candidates beyond that specified above. materials, places to visit and references,

They should record this information on the organisations, or people who might be able to

candidate’s Individual Candidate Record Card, help

which is available from the samples database (www.cambridgeinternational.org/samples).

(iii) advise on the practicability of ideas suggested by Teachers must take this assistance into account in candidates

awarding marks for the work. (iv) advise on length, approach and treatment

3.2.3 Presenting coursework

(v) treat coursework as an integral part of the (a) Each candidate must present written coursework on course and see that candidates are given regular

A4 paper, unless stated otherwise in the syllabus. class work and/or homework relating to it, as

appropriate. (b) Candidates may produce their coursework on a word processor, unless this is specifically prohibited in the

(b) In addition teachers must:

syllabus.

(i) continuously supervise work to monitor progress (ii) make sure candidates avoid plagiarism by

stating their sources and advise candidates how

54 3 Teacher assessment Cambridge Handbook 2018 (International)

3.2.4 Marking coursework

piece meets the requirements of the syllabus, the worst piece(s) should be disregarded in awarding the

(a) The teacher must award marks for coursework in line

candidate’s mark.

with the criteria in the syllabus. They must provide evidence of how they have awarded marks, using the

3.2.8 Unsatisfactory practice

documentation we have provided for that syllabus. We will provide further guidance where individual

(b) Teachers must apply the marking criteria to all teachers or centres fail to meet our requirements for pieces of work, without regard to the stage of the

coursework. Where, in our sole judgement, a significant candidate’s course at which they were produced.

problem has occurred, we may ask you to find another person to assess coursework components in future

3.2.5 Standardising marking within centres

exam series.

(a) If more than one teacher is involved in the assessment, you must standardise assessments

3.2.9 Submitting coursework for more than

across teachers and teaching groups. This will make

one syllabus

sure that all candidates have been judged against (a) There is no restriction on submitting the same the same standards for a particular syllabus. Centres

coursework for more than one syllabus, unless must produce a rank order for all candidates.

indicated in the syllabus. However, coursework This means centres must produce a list of all

submitted for more than one syllabus must be their candidates in descending order of marks. The

relevant, and will be assessed separately for each candidate with the highest mark should be first on

syllabus according to its criteria.

the list. (b) More than one moderator may require the

(b) Standardisation within a centre is achieved by all coursework. You are responsible for making sure it is teachers involved in assessing samples of work

made available.

coming to an agreement on the marks to be awarded. Marks for some teaching groups may be

3.2.10 Resubmitting coursework in later

moved up or down to make sure they are consistent

series

for the whole centre. Round up any part marks to reach the final total marks.

Candidates can resubmit, in whole or in part, coursework submitted in a previous series. The work

(c) One teacher per centre must be responsible for must comply with all guidelines specified in the standardising the marking of members of staff for

syllabus, including completing an Outline Proposal each syllabus. This teacher must make sure that a

Form where required. Any work that is resubmitted valid set of marks is produced for candidates from

needs to meet the requirements of the syllabus in that centre, for that syllabus.

that series.

You are responsible for re-marking

3.2.6 Failure to submit coursework

any work that is resubmitted and it will be subject to external moderation in the series for which it is entered.

If a candidate is entered for a coursework component but fails to submit any coursework, they are not eligible for the award of a grade in that syllabus and will receive

a ‘NO RESULT’ outcome. The teacher must mark them as absent (with an ‘A’, not ‘0’), when submitting internally assessed marks. The teacher must list the candidate’s name and leave the mark field blank on the Coursework Assessment Summary Form and the Individual Candidate Record Card.

3.2.7 Incomplete or extra coursework

(a) Some coursework components of a syllabus require candidates to produce several distinct pieces of work (for example, three essays). You should credit

a candidate who does not complete all parts of the coursework with only the marks that they have earned for the work submitted.

(b) If a candidate supplies more than the prescribed number of pieces of coursework, provided each

Cambridge Handbook 2018 (International) 3 Teacher assessment 55

Dokumen yang terkait

STRATEGI POLITIK PARTAI DEMOKRASI INDONESIA PERJUANGAN DALAM PEMENANGAN PEMILIHAN KEPALA DAERAH SECARA LANGSUNG DI KABUPATEN KAPUAS PERIODE 2013 - 2018

0 16 30

PENGARUH TERPAAN PESAN IKLAN OUTDOOR TERHADAP TINGKAT KEPERCAYAAN MAHASISWA PADA CALON WALIKOTA DAN WAKIL WALIKOTA MALANG 2013 - 2018 Studi Pada Mahasiswa Ilmu Komunikasi angkatan 2010 yang berasal dari kota Malang

0 10 61

Pengembangan aplikasi helpdesk pada Pt.jict (Jakarta international container terminal)

5 15 105

A relationship between adjustment and loneliness amongs international students at Syahid Jakarta, Indonesia

0 5 100

Peranan convervation international (CI) dalam pelestarian hutan konservasi di Provinsi Jawa Barat (studi kasus Taman Nasional Gunung Gede Pangrango)

2 32 120

Perancangan sistem informasi layanan pengiriman barang keluar negeri dengan express mail services (EMS) international di PT.Pos Indonesia Cabang Soreang Bandung Jalan Raya Soreang Banajran No.412 : laporan hasil kerja praktek

0 10 71

Peranan international labour organization (ILO) melalui programme to combat child labour in the fishing sector and jermals in Indonesia dalam menangani buruh anak di Jermal Propinsi Sumatera Utara 1999-2004

1 10 36

Prosedur pemberian kompensasi karyawan pada Pt.sankyu indonesia international cabang cilegon

1 18 1

Office of international affairs UNIKOM

0 3 6

Faktor-Faktor yang Berhubungan dengan Kejadian Stunting pada Anak Usia 24-59 Bulan di Wilayah Kerja Puskesmas Andalas Kecamatan Padang Timur Kota Padang Tahun 2018

1 5 10