Keterangan Pilihan Jawaban: SS : Sangat Setuju
S : Setuju TS : Tidak Setuju
STS : Sangat Tidak Setuju
Based on the Table 4.1 above, it shows that there are 293 for answer ss sangat setuju, 547 for answer s setuju, 83 for answer ts tidak setuju, and the last only
1 for answer sts sangat tidak setuju . In conclusion, students‘ assessment about
teacher professionalism and about students‘ interest is good.
NO Pernyataan
SS S
TS ST S
B. Minat Siswa
12. Saya senang membaca cerita Bahasa Inggris
10 26
4 13.
Materi yang disampaikan guru menarik perhatian saya.
12 28
4 14.
Tugas tugas yang diberikan cukup mudah. 11
24 5
15. Saya senang mempelajari pelajaran membaca lebih
Mendalam. 14
24 2
16. Saya bertanya kepada guru jika ada materi yang
belum dipahami 13
22 5
17. Pada membaca teks narrative banyak hal
membangkitkan rasa ingin tahu saya. 19
19 2
18. Saya antusias untuk mencari arti kata baru dalam
Kamus. 16
22 2
19. Nilai dan penghargaan yang saa terima sesuai
dengan yang saya lakukan. 9
23 7
1 20.
Saya membutuhkan waktu yang cukup singkat Untuk memahami teks narrative.
4 28
8 21.
Saya semangat untuk membaca teks narrative dalam Bentuk cerita dongeng atau legenda.
14 24
2 22.
Saya antusias untuk menyelesaikan tugas tugas agar Dapat memahami teks narrative.
13 25
2 23.
Saya merasa mudah berdiskusi dengan teman ketika menerjemahkan teks narrative.
16 21
3
2. The Result of Pre-observation
Pre observation was conducted to observe the process of teaching learning reading comprehension before implementing the action. It was held at VIII-8 class
of SMPN 13 Tangerang Selatan academic year 20152016. There were 40 students in this class. The pre-observation was conducted on 23
rd
March 2016. There were four categories that was observed by the observer in the classroom,
which were class structure, methods, teacher-student interaction, and contents. a.
Class Structure At the beginning, the teacher gave the brief overview of the material that
would be learned at that meeting, also reviewed previous day‘s course content. Then he looked around the students and asked about the students, absence and
when everything was set up he began to delivered the material.
b. Methods
The method was quite traditional; the teacher did not prepare any interesting technique in the class. The source of material only in textbook and then the
teacher wrote the material in the whiteboard while the students wrote what is in the whiteboard. He was lecturer whole time, and there was no group or class
discussion and even students centered activities.
c. Teacher-Students Interaction
The class situation was quite noisy most of time, because the methods from teacher was not fun and interesting, the amount of students was high and also
there were more male students than female students which made the class noisier. Moreover, some of male students become ―troublemaker‖, they sometimes
mocked, and yelled other students and made fun of the material when the teacher explained in front of the class. But when the teacher showed his anger, the
students slowly quite and followed the teacher explanation. Student‘s participation was still low, they did not aware of the material and they thought English was
difficult to learn like mathematics. However, there were still some students who showed their high interest in English, especially when quiz session, they were so
