Research Instrument The Data Collecting Procedure
3 Satisfactory
The students‘ attitude toward teacher‘s effort and other participant is satisfactory but still need
improvement. 4
Good The students‘ attitudes toward teacher‘s effort and
other participant is good 5
Very Good The students‘ attitudes toward teacher‘s effort and
other participant is very good
There were 5 grade of the rating scale, and each of the rating has its own quality. Start from the rating scale 1 that showed the quality of bad, scale 2
showed the quality of enough, 3 showed the quality of satisfactory, 4 showed the quality of good and 5 showed the quality of very good.
The rating scale above was used when the observer did the classroom observation. The observer rates the observation table with the qualification above.
On the other side, in analyzing the data the writer uses the tests pre action, cycle 1 and cycle 2.
In analyzing numerical data, first the writer measures the average or mean of students‘ reading score per action within one cycle. She uses the formula as
below.
41
̅ = Mean
∑x = Individual score N
= Number of students In gaining the class percentage which passes the minimum mastery criteria
KKM Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal 75 uses the formula:
41
Anas Sudjiono, Pengantar Statistik Pendidikan, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2008, p. 81.
̅
̅ = The class percentage
F = Total percentage score
N = Number of students
The last, after getting mean of students‘ score per actions, the writer identifies whether the students‘ improve their understanding of narrative text from
pre-test up to post-test in cycle 1 and cycle 2. She uses the formula as below:
P = Percentage of students‘ improvement
У = pre-test result
y
1
= Post - Test 1
P =
Percentage of students‘ improvement У
= pre-test result У
2 =
Post - Test 2