Monthly Progress Report October 2013
Western I ndonesia National Roads I mprovement Project 14
both DGH and the World Bank prior to the CTC establishment. The Bank approved the AERs with issuance letter Ref. No. WINRIP122 dated May 1
st
, 2013. Notification of Pre-Qualification Results had been announced to all PQ participants on
Mei 17, 2013 and then invitation to bid was sent to to pre-qualified Bidder and issued of the bidding document on May 27, 2013. Pokja had conducted the Pre-Bid Meeting
and Site Visit on June 2013. The last date for submission the bids and the bids opening was on July 18, 2013.
The Bank had received as well as reviewed all the proposed BER. Approval for BER issued by the Bank on September 18, 2013. Next step, the proposed of the winner
must be approved by the Ministry of Public Work because the value of contract more than IDR 100 billion based on Perpres 70, th. 2013,
Until now, only result of bidding for Package 04: Ipuh – Bantal had received approval from Ministry of Public Work for contract award. The three other of the bidding results
still in-depth discussion with BAPEKON. The main issue of these three packages was only one bidder with lowest evaluation bid had been proposed to award in remaining
three packages. A series of discussion had been held within Bapekon, POKJA and PMU WINRIP. The Pokja had already exposed that the bidder using the different main
equipment and personnel for each package. In the the last meeting with BAPEKON, held on October 25, 2013, still need clarification from the bidder that, the bidder
prepared the equipment and mobilized the personnel for each package. The Pokja had sent to Bapekon the letter of clarification from the bidder on October 28, 2013.
DGH has also completed the draft of consolidated multiple contract ICB Standard Bidding Document for four 4 packages under AWP-1. The draft had been submitted
to the Bank on 8 March 2012. The Bank’s comments had been issued on 12 March 2012. The draft of consolidated SBD was revised by DGH accommodating the Bank’s
comments and submitted to the Banks on 27 June 2012. Second revision of the draft consolidated SBD, as requested by the Bank regarding synchronization between
drawings and Bill of Quantities by letter dated 1 August 2012, was then concurred by the Bank on 31 October 2012.
CTC had also involved in Selection of DSC WINRIP since March 2013, started by attend the opening of Financial Proposal on March 5, 2013. Procurement committee
for Selection of DSC had sent Technical Evaluation Report TER to the Bank on December 20, 2013 and had received the approval from the Bank on February 21,
2013. The Final Evaluation Report including Technical and Financial Evaluation and completed with Notice of Negotiation and Draft Contract then was sent to Bank by the
committee on April 3
rd
, 2013. NOL from the Bank was received on April 19, 2013 to Renardet, SA Switzerland cs as the first rank of technical and financial evaluation
result. Finally the contract for this assignment was sign on June 11, 2013.
The WINRIP Procurement Plan is shown in Appendix E.
Monthly Progress Report October 2013
Western I ndonesia National Roads I mprovement Project 15
4.3 Civil Works Implementation
Until the end of October 2013, there was no subproject contracted.
4.4 Civil Works Progress
No civil works progress can be reported since there was no subproject contracted until the end of October 2013.
4.5 Quality Assurance
The DSC will be responsible for quality assurance of materials and workmanship, certifying whether or not contractors have achieved the required results, as well as
documentation and reporting based on the financial management plan. They will prepare a Quality Assurance system covering all subprojects, and continuously
monitor the effectiveness of their supervision procedures.
On July 01, 2013 Quality Assurance Engineer of the CTC already in mobilization. Quality Assurance Engineer has been submitted guidelines for use of “Quality
Assurance Plan” translation in Indonesi to DSC Padang on 9 and 10 October , 2013.
In according with activity of Quality Assurance Engineer in October 2013, there are some comment for Quality Assurance Engineer, during site visit to Bengkulu
Province, package Ipuh - Bantal, about as:
To discuss the Quality Assurance Aspects in relation to upcoming construction of
package Ipuh - Bantal
Explain the Quality Assurance Report who responsibility to made, preparing, checking and approval with PPK Ipuh - Bantal and explains the mean and
purpose of visit.
CTC explain, the most important Quality Assurance Report must comply with
Standard Operation Procedure SOP both for administration and technical works.
Comment CTC after visit:
o There are urgent need for drainage construction including culvert
o The school zone is needed for school area
o CTC explain, differences and advantages wear disposable fuel AMP coal than
diesel fuel. o
Routine Maintenance should be carried out
4.6 Environmental and Social Considerations
4.6.1 Current Overall Situation
A project category is assigned to each package as either Category A, B or C depending on the likely degree of influence on environmental issues with a
brief explanation as follows Appendix ….
Monthly Progress Report October 2013
Western I ndonesia National Roads I mprovement Project 16
Category A project is one which will have a significant negative impact on the environment and may have an influence on areas outside the actual project area. A
project classified as such requires an AMDAL ANDAL, RKLRPL study.
Category B project is one which affects the people or the environment to some extent but with a smaller impact than a Category A. The required environmental
analysis is a UKLUPL study only.
Category C project has minimal effect on the people or environment and an environmental analysis is not required. Standard operational procedures SOP or
SKPPL are used to handle any minor problem which may arise.
Details of packages that require environmental and social safeguard are given in Appendix No. 8 and the following table provides a summary of the work involved in
the 21 WINRIP packages.
Works Programme
No of Packages
No of Investigations Approval by
Remarks BLH
World Bank
AWP-1 4
8 SPPL x 4
Full LARAP x 4 4
SPPL 4
Full LARAP Approved
NOL issued by WB, except for SPPL
AWP-2 8
17 Simple LARAP x 1
Full LARAP x 8 AMDAL Study x 4
UKLUPL x 4 4 UKLUPL
3 AMDAL
1 SLARAP
1 one Study AMDAL for threes packages, are
Packages No.7, 12 and 14 packages on AWP2
AWP3.
1 one Study AMDAL for two packages, are
Packages No.11 16. packages on AWP2
AWP3.
AWP-3 9
14 Full LARAP x 8
AMDAL Study x 1 UKLUPL x 5
5 UKLUPL 2
Full LARAP Approved
NOL issued by WB, except for AMDAL
and UKLUPL
Total 21
39 Env=18,Soc=21
16 7
Note: UKL UPL do not need a NOL from WB, and SPPL not necessary to submit to the WB.
Out of 21 packages, have required environmental impact investigation. All 39 studies 18 environmental studies requiring approval of the Environmental Agency BLH
and 21 social studies SLARAP and LARAP requiring approval of the World Bank. Have now are 16 packages 88 has received BLH approval then the current have
7 of 21 social studies or 33 has received approval from the World Bank.
Those packages that require action at present with respect to environmental or social considerations are:
• Environmental studies for packages No.1,2 and 3 was issued approval by BLH on
2010, packages No.4,5,6,9,13,15,18,19.20 and 21 was approved on 2011 and BLH approved on 2012 for package No.17 then BLH approved for packages No.8
10 on 2013.
