Monthly Progress Report October 2013
Western I ndonesia National Roads I mprovement Project 19
d. Provide explanantion some data with no name in the nominative list.
e. Action plan signewd by the relevan local government as a commitment that the
local government will provide proper budget for the action plan f.
Implementation monitoring report by using the form provided in the LARAP.
PMU via Ref. 1286Bp.11MD2013 dated 23 September 2013 has requested the Director of Implementation Affairs Region I via the SatkerPPK to prepare the above.
Based on the WB request and letter from the PMU, now CTC has already revise the Larap Sp. Gunung Kemala – Pugung Tampak and now revision of the Larap is under
submission process to the WB.
6. Report of LARAP for Sp. Rampa - Poriaha
Larap Documents for Sp. Rampa – Poriaha in North Sumatera Province was approved the World Bank Ref.WINRIP134 dated 16 September 2013 with the the following data to
be revised:
a. Moving and providing compensation for one person kiosk owner affected must including to the action plan.
b. Action plan signewd by the relevan local government as a commitment that the local government will provide proper budget for the action plan
c. Implementation monitoring report by using the form provided in the LARAP. Based on the WB letter, PMU via Ref. 1286Bp.11MD2013 dated 23 September 2013
has requested the Director of Implementation Affairs Region I via the SatkerPPK to prepare the above.
CTC has already revised the Larap for Sp. Rampa – Poriaha package and now is under submission process to the WB.
7. Review LARAP
CTC recieved 5 five LARAP Reports from BBPJN III Palembang dated 30 September 2013. The five of LARAP reports consists Larap for Package No. 13: Sp. Rukis –
Tanjung Kemuning, Larap for Package No. 6: Psr Pedati – Kerkap, Larap for Package No. 11: Muko-muko – Bantal, Larap for Package No. 16: Seblat – Ipuh, Larap for
Package No. 16: Bintunan – Lais.
CTC has already reviewed the 5 LARAP Reports, and now under submission to the WB for approval.
4.6.2.3. Pre Implementation Review Mission
Pre Implementation Review Mission for WINRIP during October 28 – October 31, 2013. The pre mission will undertake the following activities:
a Review overall aspect of the project against the Project Development Objectives
PODs and Performance Monitoring Indicators PMIs,
Monthly Progress Report October 2013
Western I ndonesia National Roads I mprovement Project 20
b Discuss update Procurement Plan
c Monitor the compliance with environmental saveguards, confirm update status of
disclosure of project documents, review the contract packages for compliance with the agreed documents and the Bank’s guidelines.
d Monitor the application of social safeguards, confirm update status of disclosure of
project document, review the contract packages, review progress of LARAP implementation,
e Discuss financial management requirements.
The required status and progress of environmental and social documents for WINRIP
Moreover, the contractors when awarded will have to prepare the RK-PPL Rencana Kerja Pengelolaan dan Pemantauan Lingkungan or the Environmental Management and
Monitoring Work Plan as the implementation guidelines for site engineers. The guidelines should be easy to understand, with picture when necessary, so that the construction workers
can follow. Then CTC should evaluate the environmental monitoring report during construction which provide by DSC, every three month. The CTC should also provide
trainings on environmental impact management and mitigation measures for the construction contractor site engineers, the training material should include ECOPs Environmental Codes
of Practices that is already available, as well as the prevention of HIVAIDS programs. The CTC should applied integration of environmental issues on RKLRPL or UKLUPL to
design for include in BOQ These environmental requirements have to be part of the contract agreement with the
construction contractor as the obligation for implementation and its billing for payment
4.7 Anti Corruption Issues 4.7.1 Anti Corruption Action Plan ACAP
ACAP for WINRIP was developed from the previous SRIP experiences. Basically, it has the same main components of involving the Community Representative Observers
CRO in the bid opening and Third Party Monitoring TPM during the construction supervision although modification was made on the selection process of the CROs for
SRIP. Within this plan there are four main pillars as indicated separately below
a
Community Representative Observers CRO
b
Publication Disclosure
c
Complaints Handling System CHS
d
Third Party Monitoring TPM
