across the fields, researching other text-types in the same, role-play using similar text-types but different roles and relationship.
c. Teaching Reading Comprehension in SMP
Brown  2001:  7  states  that  teaching  is  guiding  and  facilitating  learning, enabling  the  student  to  learn,  and  setting  condition  for  learning.  Moreover,
teaching  defined  as  a process  of showing  or helping  the  students  or someone to learn  how  to  do  something,  giving  instructions,  guiding  in  the  study  of
something,  providing  knowledge,  causing  to  know  or  understand  Kimble  and Garmezy in Brown, 2001: 7.
In  reference  to  the  above  arguments,  teaching  reading  is  the  process  of guiding or facilitating the students to understand the meaning of the text and get
the information from the text and setting condition for learning. Teaching reading comprehension  is  also  a  process  of  showing  or  helping  the  students  to  derive
meaning  from  the  word  combination  in  the  text and  to  do  this  in  a  series  at  the reasonable speed, without vocalizing what is being read.
Related  to  teaching  high  school  students,  Brown  2001:  92  states  that teaching  high  school  is  challenging  for  teachers  since  young  adult  is  an  age  of
transition,  confusion,  self-consciousness,  growing,  and  changing  bodies  and minds.  Some  important  thoughts  that  should  be  considered  are  intellectual
capacity  of  the  students,  attention  span,  varieties  of  sensory  input,  and  factors surrounding ego, self-image, and self-es
teem. Brown 2001: 92 also states “As in teaching adults, care must be taken not to insult them with stilted language or to
bore them with over analysis.”
From the statements above, the English teachers should use an appropriate and  interesting  method  in  teaching  reading  comprehension  to  high  school
students which makes them enjoy and feel interested in the teaching and learning process. It is important for the teachers to give explanations in limited portion in
order  that  the  students  do  not  only  listen  t o  and  depend  on  the  teachers’
explanation but also they should try to understand the meaning of the text and get information from the text by themselves.
Klingner et al. 2007: 4 proposes four ways the English teachers have to do  to  improve  their  students
’  reading  comprehension.  They  are  presented  as follows:
1. Implementing  teaching  strategies  that  have  been  documented  as  an
effective way in promoting reading comprehension 2.
Designing  instructions  that  incorporate  effective  principles  of  direct instruction and strategy instruction.
3. Providing  modelling,  support,  guided  instruction,  practice,  attribution
feedback, and opportunities to practice across text types. 4.
Monitoring students’ progress and making adjustments accordingly. Below  are  key  ideas  in  reading  comprehension  that  are  presented  by
Klingner et al. 2007: 5. Direct instruction, strategy instruction, or a combination of  both  brings  a  great  effect  in  reading  comprehension  for  students.  Both  direct
instruction and strategy have the following components: 1
Assessing and evaluating the learning objectives, including orienting students to what they will be learning.
2 Reviewing daily material taught to assure mastery
3 Presenting new materials, including giving examples and demonstrating what
students need to do.
4 Guiding instruction, including asking questions to determine understanding.
5 Giving feedback and correction
6 Providing independent practice and review.
The  instructional  activities  that  give  the  highest  effect  in  improving reading  comprehension  ability  include:  conducting  teacher  and  students
questioning,  promoting  interactive  dialogue  between  teacher  and  students  and also  between  student  and  student,  controlling  task  difficulty  and  scaffolding
instruction,  elaborating  steps  or  strategies  and  modelling  by  the  teacher,  giving small  group  instruction,  and  using  cues  to  help  students  remember  to  use  and
apply what they learn.
4. Interaction-Based Activities a.
Definition of Interaction
Brown  2001:165  defines  interaction  as  the  collaborative  exchange  of thoughts, feelings, or ideas between two or more people resulting in a  reciprocal
effect  on  each  other.  In  line  with  Brown,  Malamah-Thomas  1991:7  states  that interaction  is  more  than  action  followed  by  reaction.  Interaction  is  acting
reciprocally, acting upon each other. Robinson 1994:7 defines interaction as the
process of face to face action, can be verbal, channeled through written or spoken words,  or  nonverbal,  channeled  through  touch,  proximity,  eye  contact,  facial
expression, gestures, etc. According  to  Rivers  1987:4,  interaction  can  be  two-way,  three-way,  or
four-way, but never one-way. He adds that genuine interactive language learning requires individuals teachers as well as students to appreciate the uniqueness of
other  individuals  with  their  special  needs  and  not  manipulate  or  direct  them  or decide  how  they  can  or  will  learn,  but  encourage  them  and  draw  them  out
educate and build up their confidence and enjoy what they are doing. Nunan  2004:35  suggests  that  one  of  the  most  obvious  facts  is  that  in
teaching  and  learning  a  great  deal  of  interactive  language  works  occurs  because there  is  a  significant  amount  of  talking  between  the  teacher  and  students  and
among  students.  It  reveals  a  great  dea l  about  the  teacher’s  purpose.  Interaction
will  always  involve  more  than  one  person  because  there  must  be  someone  who transmits  a  message  and  someone  who  receive  it.  In  the  educational  setting,
interaction  occurs  every  day  in  the  classroom  activities  between  the  teacher  and the students.
The  number  of  students  in  the  class  influences  the  number  of  possible variations concerning who transmit and who receive. Malamah-Thomas 1991:69
states that when teachers are seen as the ones who transmit the message, then he or  she  can  be  seen  as  trying  to  communicate  with  the  whole  class,  a  group  of
students andor individual student. And when the student performs as the one who transmit the message, heshe then interacts with the teacher another single student,
or a group of students.
b. Types of Classroom Interaction
Communication  implies  more  than  one  person  Malamah-Thomas, 1991:12. Interaction happening in the classroom is not only between the teacher
and the whole class. There are some activities where the teacher is a participant in interaction with an individual student, or with a group of students within the class.