81
3.10.1.4 KebotnDukuh Land Use
For the Kebotn activities, the ANOVA calculation result for the P value is 0 with the confident interval of 95 percent. The results have shown that the Kebotn land use
activities for the three villages are in significantly different in terms of productivity and yield. The graph shows that the variety of yield and productivity at the Dingin Village is
a lot smaller than the other two villages. The Dingin Village has lower yields and it varies in comparison to the other two villages. This is because the Dingin Village has
had many problems with forest fires. The forest fires have destroyed a lot of their Kebotn, Uratn, and Bengkar areas. Figure 3.8 shows the average mean of Kebotn yield
for the three villages.
45 25
25 N =
VILLAGE
1.30 1.20
1.10
9 5
CI KEBOTN
12000000 10000000
8000000 6000000
4000000 2000000
Figure 3.8 The Average Mean of Kebotn at the Three Villages Tepulang
Benung Dingin
82
3.10.1.5 Uratn Land Use
For the Uratn activities, the ANOVA calculation result for P value is 0.008 with the confident interval of 95 percent. This means that the Uratn land use activities at the
three villages are significantly different. The Tepulang Village has small productivity and very little of it, whereas the Benung and Tepulang Village have higher yields. The
Dingin Village has a larger variety of productivity and yield because of the abundance of post-forest fire areas. Figure 3.9 shows the average mean of Uratn yield for the three
villages.
45 25
25 N =
VILLAGE
1.30 1.20
1.10
95 CI URATN
7000000 6000000
5000000 4000000
3000000 2000000
1000000
-1000000
Figure 3.9 The Average Mean of Uratn at the Three Villages Tepulang
Benung Dingin
83
3.10.1.6 Bengkar Land Use
The Bengkar activities calculation result for P value is 0.544 with the confident interval of 95 percent. This means that the Bengkar land use activities for the three
villages were slightly not in the same situation. The averages of the yields and productivity are much different. At the Benung Village, the variety of activities,
productivity and yields for Bengkar land use are higher compared to the other two villages. This is because the Benung Village already established forest village area seven
years ago. Figure3.10 shows the average mean of Bengkar yields for the three villages.
45 25
25 N =
VILLAGE
1.30 1.20
1.10
9 5
CI BENGKAR
40000000
30000000
20000000
10000000
-10000000
Figure 3.10 The Average Mean of Bengkar at the Three Villages Tepulang
Benung Dingin
84
3.10.1.7 River Area
Kategori