Monthly Progress Report June 2013
Western I ndonesia National Roads I mprovement Project 15
All three 3 Procurement Teams or Pokja evaluated all qualification documents submitted by those Applicants. Submission of the Application Evaluation Report AER to
the Bank was on 9 May 2012 for two packages Package No.1 and No.4 and on 20 June 2012 for other two packages Package No.2 and No.3. The Bank still reviews the
AERs and requested the Pokja to submit supporting documents. The latest request from the Bank was sent to DGH on 15 March 2013 for board of director and board of
commissioner information of the Government’s Entity participated in the prequalification. Finally, the Bank approved the AERs with issuance letter Ref. No. WINRIP120 dated 22
April 2013. All the prequalified Bidders have been announced by DGH on 17 May 2013. The results of prequalification are summarized as the table below.
No Singles JO Legal Name
Participate and Result of the PQ Package
No.1 Package
No.2 Package
No.3 Package
No.4
1 PT. AdhiKarya Persero, Tbk.
Passed NA
NA Passed
2 PT. AdhiKarya - PT. AngkasapuriKonsursindo, JO.
NA Passed
Passed NA
3 PT. BangunCiptaKonstruksi - PT. AmartaKarya Persero, JO.
Passed NA
NA NA
4 PT. BrantasAbipraya Persero
Passed NA
Passed NA
5 PT. Citra GadingAsritama
NA NA
NA Passed
6 PT. ConblocInfratecno
Passed NA
Passed NA
7 PT. Duta Graha Indah, Tbk.
Passed Passed
Passed NA
8 PT. HutamaKarya Persero
NA Passed
Passed NA
9 PT. HutamaKarya Persero - PT. SuciKarya Bad inusa, JO.
Passed NA
NA Passed
10 PT. Jaya Konstruksi MP, Tbk. Passed
Passed Passed
Failed 11 Kuk Dong Eng. Corp. - PT. Duta Graha Indah, Tbk., JO.
NA NA
NA Passed
12 PT. Multi Structure Passed
Passed Passed
Passed 13 PT. NindyaKarya Persero
NA Failed
Passed Failed
14 PT. NindyaKarya Persero - PT. RindangTigasatuPratama, JO. Passed
NA NA
NA 15 Pan Asia Corp. - PT. AnugerahKarya Agra Sentosa, JO.
Passed NA
Passed Failed
16 PT. PP Persero, Tbk. NA
Passed Passed
NA 17 PT. PP Persero Tbk - PT. Tri Citra Perdana JO.
Passed NA
NA Passed
18 PT. WaskitaKarya Persero NA
Passed Passed
NA 19 PT. WaskitaKarya Persero - PT. AngkasaPuriKonsursindo, JO.
Passed NA
NA NA
20 PT. WaskitaKarya Persero - PT. DayaMuliaTurangga, JO. NA
NA NA
Passed 21 PT. WijayaKarya – PT. LubukMinturunKaryaPersada, JO.
NA Passed
Passed Passed
22 PT. Yasa Patria Perkasa NA
NA Passed
NA 23 PT. AngkasaTeknik Raya
NA Failed
Failed NA
24 PT. BangunCipta - Barettamuda KSO. NA
NA Failed
NA 25 PT. BumiRejo
Failed NA
NA Failed
26 PT. CiptaKarya Prima Mandiri NA
Failed Failed
NA 27 PT. SumberBatu
NA Failed
NA NA
28 Synohidro Co. Ltd. NA
Failed Failed
NA 29 PT. TelagaMegabuana - PT. Mawatindo Road Construction, JO
NA NA
Failed NA
Number Of Applicants submitted the document 13
13 18
12
Number Of Qualified Applicant 12
8 13
8
Number Of Applicant failed to fulfill the qualification requirement
1 5
5 4
Note : NA = Not Applied for Prequalification
.
The consolidated multiple contracts ICB Bidding Documents for four 4 packages under AWP-1 had been concurred by Bank on 31 October 2012. Following the Bank’s approval
for prequalified Bidders, the Invitation for Bid was sent to all prequalified Bidders on 27 May 2013 and the Bidding Document approved by the Bank was issued.
Pre Bid Meetings were held in 10 June 2013: in Lampung for Package No.1 Krui – Biha, in Padang for Package No. 2 Padang Sawah – Sp. Empat and Package No.3
Manggopoh – Padang Sawah, and in Bengkulu for Package No.4 Ipuh – Bantal. CTC
Monthly Progress Report June 2013
Western I ndonesia National Roads I mprovement Project 16
attended all of the pre bid meetings.
The WINRIP Procurement Plan is shown in Appendix E. 4.3 Civil Works Implementation
Until the end of June 2013, there was no subproject contracted.
4.4 Civil Works Progress
No civil works progress can be reported since there was no subproject contracted until the end of June 2013.
4.5 Quality Assurance
The DSC will be responsible for quality assurance of materials and workmanship, certifying whether or not contractors have achieved the required results, as well as
documentation and reporting based on the financial management plan. They will prepare a Quality Assurance system covering all subprojects, and continuously monitor the
effectiveness of their supervision procedures.
The CTC will give guidance to them preparing quality assurance system including standard operation procedures for all work items under the contract based on contract
specification. He is also responsible to conduct regular monitoring on the quality assurance for all civil works implementation. A Quality Assurance Engineer of the CTC is
planned to be in charged on 1
st
July 2013.
4.6 Environmental and Social Considerations 4.6.1 Current Overall Situation
A project category is assigned to each package as either Category A, B or C depending on the likely degree of influence on environmental issues with a
brief explanation as follows.
Category A project is one which will have a significant negative impact on the environment and may have an influence on areas outside the actual project area.
A project classified as such requires an AMDAL ANDAL, RKLRPL study.
Category B project is one which affects the people or the environment to some extent but with a smaller impact than a Category A. The required environmental
analysis is a UKLUPL study only.
Category C project has minimal effect on the people or environment and an environmental analysis is not required. Standard operational procedures SOP are
used to handle any minor problem which may arise.
Details of packages that require environmental and social safeguards are given in Appendix D.
Monthly Progress Report June 2013
Western I ndonesia National Roads I mprovement Project 17
The following table provides a summary of the work involved are 21 packages.
Works Program
No of Packag
es Investigations
Approved by Remarks
Nos Documents
BLH World Bank
AWP-1 4
8 SPPL 4
Full LARAP 4 4
SPPL 4
Full LARAP NOLs have been issued
by WB, except for SPPL.
AWP-2 8
17 Simple LARAP 1
Full LARAP 8 AMDAL Study 4
UKLUPL 4 4
UKLUPL Full LARAP
1 one AMDAL Study for three packages of AWP-2
and AWP-3 Package Nos. 7, 12 and 14.
1 one AMDAL Study for two packages of AWP-2
and AWP-3 Packages No.11 16.
AWP-3 9
14 Full LARAP 8
AMDAL Study 1 UKLUPL 5
5 UKLUPL
Full LARAP
Total 21
39 13
4
4.6.2 Monitoring of Environmental Aspects During Construction
CTC will circulate of environmental monitoring forms to DSC. This set of forms focused on environmental and social impacts, and amounted to 7 pages. These
forms were intended to be used every month by the DSC Environmental Specialist.
CTC’s environmental staff will actively advise to DSC on environmental monitoring, but have not directly carried out monitoring, despite the CTC TOR requirement to “to
implement the Environmental and Social Assessment and Management Plan for WINRIP”, which involves monitoring of environmental plans and studies.
After finalizing the Standard Environmental Clauses SEC, CTC assisted Subdit Environmental Affairs to produce monitoring forms covering all aspects of the
technical specifications, and introduced them to participants of environmental training including P2JN, Project Manager, DSC, Contractors, Pokja etc. There are 69 pages
of forms, covering all aspects of construction.
4.6.3 Design Integration, Road Safety aspects and Monitoring of Environmental
Studies Task 5.8.0 of CTC-2 TOR Implement the Environmental Sosial Assessment and
Management PlanESAMP and Para 10.9 of the PMM requires ensuring that environmental management aspects of contracts have been implemented in
accordance with AMDAL, UKLUPL, SPPL studies and Environmental issues will integrated to design, Prepare environmental mitigation on construction stage for
contractor Contractor Program for Executing Environmental Managemen Plan CPEMPRKPPL. Therefore CTC will propose to visit the site of projects subject to
studies or issues, and ensure that the plans are being implemented. A schedule for these visits is still in process.
