SHORT FORM MCGILL
SKOR : 0: tidak ada 2: sedang 1: ringan
3: berat
No. RASA 1
2 3
1. Cekot - Cekot
2. Menyentak
3. Menikam Seperti Pisau
4. Tajam Seperti Silet
5. Keram
6. Menggigit
7. Terbakar
8. Ngilu
9. BeratPegal
10. Nyeri Sentuh 11. Mencabik Cabik
12. Menakutkan 13. Melelahkan
14. Memualkan 15. Menghukum-Kejam
Tidak ada Nyeri Nyeri paling berat
Intensitas Nyeri Sekarang PPI Tidak Ada Nyeri
1 Nyeri Ringan
2 Tidak Nyaman
3 Mencemaskan
4 Menyeramkan
5 Menyiksa
lampiran 5
Lampiran 6
Lampiran 7
NO UMUR
JENIS KELAMIN
SUKU SENSORI
AFEKTIF TINGKAT
KECEMASAN DIAGNOSIS
VAS
1 75
WANITA MINANG
5 10
SPONDILOSIS LUMBALIS 8,5
2 64
WANITA BATAK
4 2
22 SPONDILOSIS LUMBALIS
8,7 3
53 WANITA
BATAK 2
8 SPONDILOSIS LUMBALIS
2 4
23 PRIA
JAWA 2
1 11
TRAUMA 5,5
5 61
WANITA BATAK
15 2
3 SPONDILOSIS LUMBALIS
7,9 6
63 WANITA
BATAK 3
1 5
SPONDILOSIS LUMBALIS 3
7 33
WANITA BATAK
6 2
23 HNP
8,8 8
64 WANITA
BATAK 6
3 10
SPONDILOSIS LUMBALIS 5,0
9 72
PRIA BATAK
3 15
SPONDILOSIS LUMBALIS 5,7
10 65
PRIA BATAK
2 20
SPONDILOSIS LUMBALIS 7,8
11 75
PRIA BATAK
2 17
HNP 3
12 56
WANITA BATAK
13 5
19 SPONDILOSIS LUMBALIS
7,7 13
50 WANITA
BATAK 3
2 14
HNP 5,6
14 21
PRIA MINANG
3 3
8 TRAUMA
3,5 15
52 WANITA
BATAK 15
5 17
SPONDILOSIS LUMBALIS 8
16 58
WANITA BATAK
5 1
6 SPONDILOSIS LUMBALIS
3,3 17
43 WANITA
BATAK 4
2 12
SPONDILOSIS LUMBALIS 4,5
18 62
PRIA BATAK
3 15
SPONDILOSIS LUMBALIS 5,0
19 64
WANITA BATAK
3 8
SPONDILOSIS LUMBALIS 2,3
20 59
WANITA BATAK
3 14
HNP 5,9
21 70
WANITA BATAK
4 6
19 SPONDILOSIS LUMBALIS
7,8 22
64 PRIA
BATAK 1
1 12
SPONDILOSIS LUMBALIS 3,6
23 76
WANITA BATAK
2 1
15 SPONDILOSIS LUMBALIS
5,5 24
34 WANITA
BATAK 4
1 22
HNP 8,5
25 70
PRIA BATAK
4 6
16 TRAUMA
6 26
73 PRIA
BATAK 6
2 15
SPONDILOSIS LUMBALIS 5,0
27 53
WANITA MELAYU
2 16
SPONDILOSIS LUMBALIS 7,5
28 66
WANITA BATAK
1 14
SPONDILOSIS LUMBALIS 4,7
29 73
PRIA BATAK
3 17
HNP 7
30 61
WANITA BATAK
2 18
SPONDILOSIS LUMBALIS 7,2
31 49
WANITA BATAK
2 1
7 SPONDILOSIS LUMBALIS
4,3 32
58 WANITA
BATAK 1
7 HNP
4 33
34 PRIA
JAWA 7
12 HNP
6,6 34
64 WANITA
BATAK 7
10 SPONDILOSIS LUMBALIS
4,8
Lampiran 8 ANALISIS SPSS
FREQUENCY TABLE
SUKU
Frequency Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Valid BATAK 29
85.3 85.3
85.3 JAWA
2 5.9
5.9 91.2
MELAYU 1
2.9 2.9
94.1 MINANG
2 5.9
5.9 100.0
Total 34
100.0 100.0
JENIS KELAMIN
Frequency Percent Valid
Percent Cumulative
Percent Valid LAKI LAKI
11 32.4
32.4 32.4
PEREMPUAN 23
67.6 67.6
100.0 Total
34 100.0
100.0
DIAGNOSIS
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent Valid HNP
8 23.5
23.5 23.5
SPONDILOSIS LUMBALIS
23 67.6
67.6 91.2
TRAUMA 3
8.8 8.8
100.0 Total
34 100.0
100.0
KategoriUmur
Frequency Percent Valid
Percent Cumulative
Percent Valid 61 tahun
15 44.1
44.1 44.1
60 tahun 19
55.8 55.8
100.0 Total
34 100.0
100.0
CORRELATION TEST TABLE
Correlations
VAS TINGKAT KECEMASAN
VAS Pearson
Correlation 1
.640 Sig. 1-tailed
.000 N
34 34
TINGKAT KECEMASAN
Pearson Correlation
.640 1
Sig. 1-tailed .000
N 34
34 . Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level 1-tailed.
NORMALITY TEST TABLE
STATISTIK KARAKTERISTIK NYERI
Statistics
VAS SENSORI
AFEKTIF N
Valid 34
34 34
Missing Mean
5.712 4.35
1.38 Std. Deviation
1.9837 3.558
1.792 Range
6.8 14
6
Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnov
a
Shapiro-Wilk Statistic
df Sig.
Statistic df
Sig. VAS
.110 34
.200 .955
34 .175
TINGKAT KECEMASAN
.102 34
.200 .979
34 .725
. This is a lower bound of the true significance. a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
ADDA.2015. Chronic Pain. Anxiety And Depression Association of America.USA.
Adelmanesh et al., 2011.Results from the translation and adaptation oftheIranianShort-Form
McGill Pain
Questionnaire I-SFMPQ:
preliminary evidence ofits reliability, construct validity and sensitivity in an Iranianpainpopulation. Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy, Rehabilitation,
TherapyTechnology 20113:27.
Alshami, A.M., 2014. Physical and psychological aspects of low back pain among Saudi patients: A case-control study.Saudi J Med Med Sci
2014;2:24-9 Ayuningtyas, D.Y., 2012.Tingkat Kecemasan Status Virginitas pada Remaja
Putri di Desa Jatisawit Kecamatan Bumiayu. Skripsi. Purwokerto: FakultasPsikologi Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto.
Bener, A., El-Rufaie O.F., Kamran S., Georgievski A.B., Farooq A., Rysavy M., 2006. Disability, Depression and Somatization in Low Back Pain.In:
Bener et al., 2013.Psychological Factors: Anxiety, Depression, and SomatizationSymptoms in Low Back Pain Patients. Journal of Pain
Research 2013:6 95-101. Bukit, S.T., 2014. Hubungan Kadar C-Reactive Protein dengan Gangguan Tidur
dan Depresi pada Penderita Nyeri Punggung Bawah. Tesis. Medan:FakultasKedokteran Universitas Sumatera Utara.
Dahlan, M.S., 2013. Besar Sampel dan Cara Pengambilan Sampel. Edisi 3.Jakarta: Salemba Medika.
DEPKESRI., 2014. Lighting The Hope For Schizoprenia Warnai Peringatan HariKesehatan Jiwa 2014. Kementrian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia.
Jakarta.Tersedia:http:webcache.googleusercontent.comsearch?q=cache:1 9fAGd3o9EsJ:www.depkes.go.idarticleview201410270010lighting-the-
hope-forschizoprenia-warnai-peringatan-hari-kesehatan-jiwa- tahun2014.html+cd=2hl=idct=clnkgl=id
Engstrom, J.W., 2005. Back and Neck Pain. In: Kasper, D.L., Fauci, A.S., Longo, D.L., Braunwald, E., Hauser, S.L., and Jameson, J.L., eds. 2005.
Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine. 16th ed. USA:The McGraw Hill Companies,Inc, 94-104.
Hamilton, M. The Assessmen of Anxiety States by Rating. Br. J. Med. Psychol.1959; 32:50-55.
Hall, H.Mclntosh, G., 2008. Low Back Pain chronic. Clinical Evidence2008;10:1116.
Hardiani, C. A., 2012.Kecemasan dalam Menghadapai Masa Bebas padaNarapidana
Anak di
Lembaga Pemasyarakatan
Anak Kutoarjo.Skripsi.Yogyakarta: Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas
Negeri Yogyakarta. Helsley. J.D., 2008.Generalized Anxiety Disorder. In: Vanin. J.R., Helsley. J.D.,
2008Anxiety Disorders: A Pocket Guide for Primary Care. USA: Humana Press, 184.
Hestbaek, L., Leboeuf-Yde, C. Manniche, C. 2003. Low Back Pain: What is TheLong-Term Course? In: Pearce, J.M., 2012. A Biographical Studyof
Menwith Chronic Low Back Pain.A review of studies of general patientpopulations.European Spine Journal 12, 149-165.
Hong, J.H., Kim, H.D., Shin, H.H., Huh, B., 2014. Assessment of Depression,Anxiety, Sleep Disturbance, and Quality of Life in Patients
with ChronicLowBack Pain in Korea. Korean J Anesthesiol 2014 June 666: 444-450.
Manchikanti, L., 2000. Epidemiology of Low Back Pain.Pain Physician Vol. 3,No.2, pp 167-192. USA: Pain Management Centre of Paducah,
Paducah,KY.McCracken, L. M., Zayfert, C., and Gross, R. T., 1992. The
Pain AnxietySymptoms Scale: Development and validation of a scale to measure fear ofpain. Pain 50:67
–73. In Vowles K.E., Zvolensky M.J., Gross R.T., SperryJ.A., 2003. PainRelated in the Predicition of Chronic
Low Back Pain Distress.Journal of Behavioral Medicine, Vol.27, No.1, February 2004.
Melzack, R.,
1987.The Short
Form –
McGill Pain
Questionnaire.Pain,301987191-197. Available:https:www.esahq.org~mediaESAFilesClinicalTrialNetwork
PLATADocs04A20Appendix4APLATAManuscript20sfMGPQ20 v102025FEB2013.ashx
Mok, L.C., Lee, .I.F., 2008. Anxiety, Depression and Pain Intensity in Patients with Low Back Pain Who are Admitted to Acute Care Hospitals. Abstract.
Hong Kong:
Journal of
Clinical Nursing.J
Clin Nurs.2008
Jun;1711:1471-80. Munir, S., 2012. Analisis Nyeri Punggung Bawah pada Pekerja Bagian
FinalPacking dan Part Supply di PT.X Tahun 2012. Tesis. Jakarta: FakultasKesehatan Masyarakat Universitas Indonesia.
PhiloBeukes., 2012. Pathophysiology of Chronic Back Pain. South African:BeukesMayer.Available:http:www.phillobeukes.co.zaresearchl
umbar-spine165-pathophysiology-of-chronic-back-pain. Polatin, et al., 1993. Psychiatric Illness and Chronic Low Back Pain: The
Mindand The Spine which Goes First?. Phila Pa 1976 1993; 18: 66-71. Price, S.A. Wilson, L.M., 2005. Patofisiologi: Konsep Klinis Proses-
ProsesPenyakit. Edisi 6. Jakarta: EGC. Sadock, B.J. Sadock, V.A., 2010. Kaplan Sadock Buku Ajar Psikiatri
Klinis.Edisi 2. Jakarta: EGC. Savigny, P. et al., 2009. Low Back Pain: Early Management of Persisten Non-
spesific Low Back Pain. In: Pearce, J.M., 2012. A Biographical StudyofMen
with Chronic
Low Back
Pain.London, National
CollaboratingCentrefor Primary Care and Royal College of General Practitioners.
Sagheer, M.A., Khan M.F., Sharif S., 2013. Association Between Chronic Low Back Pain, Anxiety and Depression in Patients at a Tertiary Care Centre.
J Pak Med Assoc. 2003 Jun;636:688-90. Schell, E. et al., 2008.
Stress Biomarkers’ Associations to Pain in The Neck,Shoulder and Back in Healthy Media Workers: 12- Month
ProspectiveFollow-Up. Eur Spine J 2008 17:393-405. Setyanigrum, M.S., 2014. Hubungan Indeks Massa Tubuh dengan AngkaKejadian
Low Back
Pain di
RSUD Dr.
Moewardi Surakarta.
Skripsi.Surakarta:Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Surakarta. Shelton, C.I., 2004. Diagnosis and Management of Anxiety Disorders.
Articles.USA:The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association, March 2004, Vol.104, S2-S5.
Simamora, D.T., 2014. Hubungan Koping Nyeri dengan Intensitas Nyeri PadaPasien Nyeri Kronis di Rumah Sakit Umum Pusat H. Adam Malik
Medan.Skripsi. Medan: Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Sumatera Utara. Sugiyono. 2010., Statistika untuk Penelitian. Cetakan ke -16, CV.
Alfabeta,Bandungdalam: Valianti R.M. 2012., Motovasi dan Pengaruhnya terhadap efektivitaskerja karyawan pada P.T. Sigma Utama Palembang.
Jurnal:Wahana Ekonomika Vol. 9 No. 3, Oktober 2012
Stuart, G.W., 2006. Buku Saku Keperawatan Jiwa. Edisi 5. Jakarta: EGC. Tudler, M.V.et al., 2006.European Guidelines for The Management of
AcuteNonspecific Low Back Pain in Primary Care. Eur Spine J 2006 15 Suppl.2:169-191.
Vanin. J.R., 2008.Overview of Anxiety and the Anxiety Disorder In: Vanin. J.R.,Helsley. J.D., 2008 Anxiety Disorders: A Pocket Guide for Primary
Care.USA: Humana Press, 8.
BAB 3 KERANGKA KONSEP DAN DEFENISI OPERASIONAL
3.1. Kerangka Konsep Penelitian
Berdasarkan tujuan penelitian di atas maka kerangka konsep dalam penelitian ini adalah:
Variabel Independen Variabel Dependen
Gambar 3.1.Kerangka Konsep Penelitian.
3.2. Definisi Operasional
1. Intensitas Nyeri
