B. Suggestion
Based on the conclusion of the study, it can be delivered as a consideration, go to:
1. The students should be aware of the new learning technique that they can use to support their learning process, because one technique maybe works
better than the other. And every student definitly have one learning technique that suit them best.
2. The teachers should be careful in determining the term of implementing a technique, and also to make sure that the students understand any of
material explained by the teachers. 3. The other researchers can use this study as a comparison that mind
mapping technique may not have positive effect to some students.
4.
The school should better support the teachers in implementing a technique by giving proper time, place, and facilities for the success of knowledge
transfer from the teachers to the students.
REFERENCES
Abbott, H. Porter. The Cambridge Introduction to Narrative. UK: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
Abi-El-Mona, Issam and Fouad Adb-El-Khalick. The Influence of Mind Mapping on Eighth Graders’ Science Achievement. School Science and
Mathematics, Vol. 1087, 2008.
Afflerbach, Peter, P. David Pearson, and Scott G. Paris. Clarifying Differences Between Reading Skills and Reading Strategies. The Reading Teacher,
615, 2008.
Alyousef, Hesham Suleiman. Teaching Reading Comprehension to ESLEFL Learners. The Reading Matrix, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2005.
Amer, Aly A. The Effect of Story Grammar Instruction on EFL Stude nts’
Comprehension of Narrative Text, Reading in a Foreign Language, 82, 1992.
Anderson, Mark and Kathy Anderson. Text Types in English 3. South Yarra: Macmillan Education Australia, 1998.
Anderson, Richard C. et al., Becoming a Nation of Reader: the Report of the Commission on Reading. Washington DC: The National Institute of
Education, US Department of Education, 1984.
Aviv. Module Pembelajaran Narrative Text SMA Kelas 11 Semester 2. Kebumen: SPEC and Academic Pare, 2013.
Badan Perpustakaan, Kearsipan, dan Dokumentasi Provinsi Kalimantan Barat. “Ulang Tahun, Perpusnas Luncurkan Mobil Pustaka Hydron”,
http:
bpkd.kalbarprov.go.id, 7
th
December 2014. Badan Pusat Statistik.
“Indikator Sosial Budaya 2003, 2006, 2009, 2012”, http:www.bps.go.id, 7
th
December 2014. Bennett, Barrie and Carol Rolheiser. Beyond Monet: The Artful Science of
Instructional Integration. Toronto: Bookation Inc., 2001. Buzan, Tony. the Mind Map Book. USA: Penguin Book Ltd, 1994.
Buzan, Tony. Mind Maps for Kids, an Introduction —the Shortcut to Success at
School. UK: Thorsons, 2003. Buzan, Tony. Use Your Head. London: Book Club Associates, 1984.
Carell, Patricia L. Some Issues in Studying the Role of Schemata, or Background Knowledge, in Second Language Comprehension. Toronto: TESOL
Convention, 1983.
Cavanagh, Jane. Text Types. New South Wales: Country Areas Program CAP of Dubbo School of Distance Education.
Christensen, Larry B. Experimental Methodology. USA: Pearson Education, Inc., 2006.
Clouse, Barbara Fine. the Student Writer. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2006.
Coffman, Gerry A. and Melissa D. Reed, the True Story of Narrative Text: from Theory to Practice. Kansas: The Reading Professor vol. 32 no. 1, 2010.
Davies, F. Introducing Reading. London: Penguin, 1995. Davies, Martin. Concept Mapping, Mind Mapping and Argument Mapping: What
are the Differences and do they Matter. Victoria: Springer, 2010. Faste, Rolf A. “Mind Mapping”, an Unpublished Book Chapter Describing the
Use of Mind Maps in Design, US, 1997. Garfield, Richard et al. Technical brief
–Purposive sampling and site selection. Geneva: ACAPS, 2011.
Gebhard, Jerry Greer. Teaching English as a Foreign or Second Language —a Self
Development and Methodology Guide. US: University of Michigan Press, 1996.
Grabe, William and Fredricka L. Stoller. Reading for Academic Purposes: Guidelines for the ESLEFL Teacher. in Celce-Murcia ed. Teaching
English as a Second or Foreign Language 3rd Edition. Boston: Hainle Hainle, 2001.
Kategori