Statistical Hypothesis RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
17 95
80 18
95 90
19 100
100 20
70 60
21 80
80 22
75 85
23 95
95 24
80 95
25 95
95 26
85 80
27 70
90 From the Table 4.1 above, it could be seen that the scores of pretest and
posttest in experimental class were quite various. The lowest score of the pretest given to 27 students was 60. And even after the treatment was given to the
experimental class, 60 were still the lowest score in the posttest. Not different from the lowest score of pretest and posttest, the highest score of the pretest and
posttest given to 27 students was the same, which were 100. The further information about the pretest and posttest score can be seen trough the Table 4.2
and 4.3 below.
Table 4.2 Frequency Distribution Table of Pretest Result of Experimental Class
No Interval Value Frequency
1
30-40 -
2
41-50 -
3
51-60 3
4
61-70 5
5
71-80 4
6
81-90 7
7
91-100 8
Total 27
Table 4.3 Frequency Distribution Table of Posttest Result of Experimental Class
No Interval Value Frequency
1
30-40 -
2
41-50 -
3
51-60 2
4
61-70 3
5
71-80 6
6
81-90 6
7
91-100 10
Total 27
The frequency distribution depicted in Table 4.2 and 4.3 were based on the pretest and posttest result in experimental class. It could be seen that there were a
decrease in the number of students who get score between 51 and 60. In pretest, there were 3 students who get the score between 51 and 60, and in posttest it
decreased into 2 students. A decrease was also happened to the students who get score in interval 61
—70 and 81—90. In interval 61—70, the frequency of the students decreased from 5 into 3 students only while in interval 81
—90 the frequency of the students decreased from 7 into 6 students. Overall, there were 1
to 2 decreases of students in interval 51 —60, 61—70, and 81—90. And it means
that the students who get lower score in posttest were fewer compared to the pretest result.
In addition to decreasing in some interval values, intervals 71 —80 and 91—
100 were on increase. There were 2 increases of students in both intervals. It means that the students who get higher score in posttest are increased than in
pretest. In interval 71 —80, the frequency of the students increased from 4 into 6
students and in interval 91 —100 the frequency of the students increased from 8
into 10 students. For more details, the comparison between pretest and posttest results can be more clearly seen on the Figure 4.1 below.
Figure 4.1 Bar Diagram of Pretest and Posttest Comparison of Experimental Class
The Figure 4.1 above showed the comparison between pretest and posttest result in experimental class. The higher and lower frequency could be easily
compared as the blue block represented pretest result and the red block represented posttest result.
b. The Data of Control Class Table 4.4
Pretest and Posttest Score of Control Class
Students Y
Pretest Posttest
1 95
65 2
100 85
3 90
90 4
80 95
5 95
95 6
95 95
7 85
65 8
90 75
9 85
100 10
80 85
11 95
95
2 4
6 8
10 12
30-40 41-50 51-60 61-70 71-80 81-90 91-100
Fr e
q u
e n
cy
Interval Value
Experimental Class
Pretest Posttest