Respondents Setting Instruments METHODOLOGY

31 The fourth step conducted by the writer was evaluation. In this step, the writer conducted a survey in order to obtain evaluation and to gain feedback on the designed set materials. It was done as the fifth step of designing a set of materials, that was evaluation. Finally, the last step taken was main product revision. In this step, the writer made revision on the designed materials based on the evaluation obtained in the fourth step so that the final revision of materials was set. The last step of designing a set of materials, that was revising was included in this step.

B. Respondents

In the step of research and information collecting, there were two groups of respondents in this study. The first group was the first semester students of the first grade of tourism department on SMK Negeri 4 Yogyakarta who were the respondents of the needs survey. The data collected in this study were students’ opinions on what kind of materials they need and they want. The second group of respondent in this study was the English teachers of SMK Negeri 4 Yogyakarta who were asked in order to obtain the data of need analysis and to know the teachers’ expectation. After designing the materials, the writer administrated evaluation, which was aimed at gaining feedback and evaluation of the designed materials so that any changes could be made for the sake of improvement. Thus the writer distributed the materials and questionnaires to the respondents of preliminary field testing. The respondents of this survey were English lecturers of English Education Program of 32 Sanata Dharma University and English teachers of SMK Negeri 4 Yogyakarta. The data collected in this study were the opinions on whether the designed set of materials was appropriate or not for the first grade students of SMK Negeri Yogyakarta , especially tourism department students. Besides, the writer also obtained respondents’ suggestions and recommendation on the designed set of materials.

C. Setting

This study took place in SMK Negeri 4 Yogyakarta. As the time of study, the writer used active days when the students went to school or attended a class. The study was done from January 2007 to February 2007.

D. Instruments

The writer used three kinds of instruments to gather data in this study. They are questionnaires, interviews and books. 1. Questionnaires The questionnaires of research and information collecting were distributed to the first semester students of the first grade of tourism department on SMK Negeri 4 Yogyakarta . It consisted of two types of questions. The questions of the first type were closed questions. In this type of questions, there were provided some questions and alternative answers and the respondents chose the answers according to their opinions. The second type of the questions was open questions. In this type of questions, the respondents were asked to write down their opinions on the statements PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI 33 or problems provided. The writer made the questionnaires in Bahasa Indonesia in order to avoid misinterpretation. In preliminary field testing step, the writer also used questionnaires as a means of gaining an assessment of the designed set of materials. It consisted of two types of questions. The questions of the first type were closed questions. In this type of questions, some questions and alternative answers were and the respondents chose the answers according to their opinions. The second type of the questions was open questions. In this type of questions, the respondents were asked to write down their opinions on the statements or questions provided. 2. List of Interview Questions The interview was done to the first semester students of the first grade of tourism department on SMK Negeri 4 Yogyakarta. The interview was done in an informal way to create familiarity between the writer and the respondents. It also helped the writer to get feedback in an easier way to avoid awkward situations in interviewing the respondents. 3. Books The books used in this study were the books about instructional design model and also other books that support this study. From the books of instructional design, the writer combined two models proposed by Yalden and Kemp.

E. Data Gathering Technique