language, but also discusses and learns it relation with the society or community. In other words, sociolinguistics is the study of the ways people use language in
social interaction. As stated by Spolsky: Sociolinguistics is the field that studies the relation between language and
society, between the use of language and the social structures in which the users of language live. It is a field of study that assumes that human
society is made up of many related patterns and behaviors, some of which are linguistics 2010:3.
Based on the explanation above, the writer used sociolinguistics approach because sociolinguistics is a study of language in society. Besides, code of
language is one of linguistics scopes of studies. Dealing with this research, this approach supports the writer to answer the problems stated in problem
formulation.
C. Method of the Study
This section consists of two parts, namely data collection and data analysis. Data collection explains how data are collected and organized, and data
analysis presents the analysis of the data to reveal the answer for the problem formulation.
1. Data Collection
This study used the data taken from Mata Najwa talk show. There were some steps to do this research. The first step is the writer downloaded the video
from youtube.com. Then, the writer made the transcript of the talks show. There were four speakers in the talks show, namely Najwa Shihab, Susi Pudjiastuti, Riza
Damanik, and Captain Samson, but the writer only focused in Susi Pudjiastuti PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
which means the writer only listed the utterances spoken by Susi Pudjiastuti that contain code mixing. The writer limited the data and chose only some appropriate
data to be analyzed. Finally, After collecting the data, the writer divided the data into two tables, the first table was for the types of code mixing and the second
table was for the reasons of code mixing.
2. Data Analysis
This part presents the analysis of the data. The writer categorized the collected data and made the descriptive analysis to check the result of the data
collection. Firstly, data were classified into the types of code mixing and the reasons of code mixing. Then the writer summarized and explained the analysis
about the type and the reasons of code mixingspoken by Susi Pudjiastuti based on the
Kachru’s dan Hoffmann’s theory. On the next chapter, the writer provided some examples to represent the data. By categorizing each of the code mixing, the
writer was able to answer questions stated in problem formulation. The sample data were used to describe each type and reason of code mixing.
To simplify the analysis of the data, the writer made the numbering of the data. The data were presented like ADN-15, which means Appendix 1, Data
Number 15, or BDN-15, which means Appendix 2, Data Number 15. Appendix 1 presents the types of code mixing, while appendix 2 presents the reasons of code
mixing. PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
23
CHAPTER IV ANALYSIS RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
