41
c The first expert He was the participant in the first content analysis. He would complete the
evaluation sheet. Next, interview would be conducted to him to clarify his answers.
d The second expert He was the participant in the second content analysis. He would evaluate
the product by answering questions in evaluation sheet. After that, he would be interviewed in case of clarifying his answers.
D. Research Instruments and Data Gathering Technique
The study used three kinds of instruments, namely questionnaires, interview, and classroom observation. Besides, the data was gathered by
distributing questionnaire, conducting an interview, and conducting classroom observation. The explanation of this part would be separated into two, namely
research instruments and data gathering technique in pre-design and post-design survey.
1. Research Instruments and Data Gathering Technique in Pre-Design Survey
This survey used three kinds of instruments to gather the data, as follows. a Distributing questionnaire
The study used questionnaires in the form of closed-ended and open questions. In pre-design survey, it was distributed to the first grade students see
Appendix B.1. Questionnaire together with pre-test were distributed to the
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
42
students on Tuesday, April 12, 2011. This questionnaire would discuss about the students’ interest in learning English, the difficulties found by the students in the
learning, and the students awareness and willingness of using computer as the learning medium.
There were seventy five students who fulfilled the questions in the questionnaire and pre-test. They came from different classrooms, namely
Akuntansi Class AK Class, Administrasi Perkantoran Class AP Class, and Penjualan Class PJ Class. Since the writer used purposive sampling, she only
took randomly a half of all students’ questionnaire that had answered completely. Besides, all the result of pre-test was the data to analyze the students’ learning
progress about the simple tenses. b Conducting an interview
According to Ary 2002, there are two kinds of interview, namely open interview and close-ended interview. In this step, the writer conducted open
interview to the English teachers in order to analyze the learners’ characteristics and the progress of grammar learning. The writer used open-ended interview
because it allowed her to develop the questions in order to get more detailed information see Appendix B.3.
Interview was conducted on Tuesday, April 12, 2011. The interviewee was the English teacher of Sanjaya Pakem Voctional School. It was organized in order
to elicit more information about the students’ learning progress, the problems found at school, the solutions to solve the problems, the media that the teacher
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
43
usually used to teach, and the teacher’s opinion about designing a new interactive learning medium by using computer.
c Classroom observation The study used classroom observation see Appendix B.4 without
participating in the situation. According to Ary, Jacobs, Razavieh, and Sorensen 2002, that kind of observation was called as nonparticipant observation p. 430.
The observation involved the students, the teachers, and the facilities provided in the school. This observation would observe the students’ attitude when they
learned English subject, the teacher’s acts when she taught the students, and the facilities provided in the school. The purpose of this process was to understand
and analyze the background information of the participants who would use the product being used and of the facilities provided in the school such as teachers
and other equipments needed to support English learning. The observation was conducted on Thursday, April 14, 2011, to the three
classes at SMK Sanjaya Pakem. The writer used observation checklist items.
2. Research Instruments and Data Gathering Technique in Post-Design Survey
