The Creative Thinking Ability Pre-test and Post-test

93 students who get the score 3 for amount 31,14 from the cycle I to cycle II. The increase on indicator A because increasing the amount of students who are asking the question at the learning process based on the students’ willingness or after the teacher giving an opportunity to ask questions. Table 22. Comparison of the Score Obtained by Students on Indicator B of Creative Thinking Ability Cycle I to Cycle II Score Indicator B of Creative Thinking Ability Cycle I Cycle II Differen ce Explaination Amount of Student Amount of Student 1 17 54,84 16 50 4,84 Amount of students who obtain a score 1 decreased for amount 4,48. 2 9 29,03 7 21,87 7,16 Amount of students who obtain a score 2 decreased for amount 7,16. 3 5 16,13 9 28,13 12 Amount of students who obtain a score 3 increased for amount 12. Total 31 100 32 100 Source: primer data Table 12 and Table 17 Based on the Table 22, the amount of students who obtain a score 1 decreased for amount 4,48 because there was an increasing the students who are able to answer questions from the teacher or other students at the learning process. Amount of students who obtain a score 2 decreased for amount 7,16 because when the teacher pointed the student to answer questions, students are still reluctant to answer. In addition, amount of students who obtain a score 3 increased for 94 amount 12 because an increasing of students who are able to answer questions from the teacher or other students. So, on indicator B of Creative Thinking Ability from the cycle I to cycle II there is an increased. Table 23. Comparison of the Score Obtained by Students on Indicator C of Creative Thinking Ability Cycle I to Cycle II Score Indicator C of Creative Thinking Ability Cycle I Siklus II Differen ce Explaination Amount of Student Amount of Student 1 19 61,29 12 37,5 23,79 Amount of students who obtain a score 1 decreased for amount 23,79. 2 5 16,13 16 50 33,87 Amount of students who obtain a score 2 increased for amount 33,87. 3 7 22,58 4 12,5 10,08 Amount of students who obtain a score 3 decreased for amount 10,08. Total 31 100 32 100 Source: primer data Table 12 and Table 17 Based on the Table 23, amount of students who obtain a score 1 decreased for amount 23,79 because an increasing amount of students who were able to give an answer to the question by own mind at the learning process. On score 2 for amount 33,87 showed an improvement of students who are able to give an answer to the question by own mind, but occasionally reading a book. Amount of students who obtain a score 3 decreased from the cycle I to cycle II for amount 10,08 because an decreased amount of students who were 95 able to give an answer to the question by own mind without reading a book, because the students are still not confident to deliver an idea with own mind. The students still confidently explained their ideas with occasionally reading or viewing the contents of a book first. Table 24. Comparison of the Score Obtained by Students on Indicator D of Creative Thinking Ability Cycle I to Cycle II Score Indicator D of Creative Thinking Ability Cycle I Cycle II Differen ce Explanation Amount of Student Amount of Student 1 25 80,64 17 53,13 27,51 Amount of students who obtain a score 1 decreased for amount 27,51. 2 1 3,23 7 21,87 18,64 Amount of students who obtain a score 2 increased for amount 18,64. 3 5 16,13 8 25 8.87 Amount of students who obtain a score 3 increased for amount 8,87. Total 31 100 32 100 Source: primer data Table 12 and Table 17 Based on the Table 24, the amount of students who obtain a score 1 decreased for amount 27,51 because an increasing amount of students who are able to put forward the reason answer of question successfully answered by students during the learning process. Amount of students who obtain a score 2 increased for amount 18,64 because the students are able to give reasons for the answer of the question that successfully answered by the students, but has not been yet obtimal in explaining it. While on score 3, there is an increase for