The Creative Thinking Ability Pre-test and Post-test
93 students who get the score 3 for amount 31,14 from the cycle I to
cycle II. The increase on indicator A because increasing the amount of students who are asking the question at the learning process based on
the students’ willingness or after the teacher giving an opportunity to ask questions.
Table 22. Comparison of the Score Obtained by Students on Indicator B of Creative Thinking Ability Cycle I to Cycle II
Score Indicator B of Creative Thinking Ability
Cycle I Cycle II
Differen ce
Explaination Amount
of Student
Amount of
Student 1
17 54,84
16 50
4,84 Amount of students
who obtain a score 1 decreased for
amount 4,48.
2 9
29,03 7
21,87 7,16
Amount of students who obtain a score 2
decreased for amount 7,16.
3 5
16,13 9
28,13 12
Amount of students who obtain a score 3
increased for amount 12.
Total 31
100 32
100 Source: primer data Table 12 and Table 17
Based on the Table 22, the amount of students who obtain a score 1 decreased for amount 4,48 because there was an increasing the
students who are able to answer questions from the teacher or other students at the learning process. Amount of students who obtain a
score 2 decreased for amount 7,16 because when the teacher pointed the student to answer questions, students are still reluctant to answer.
In addition, amount of students who obtain a score 3 increased for
94 amount 12 because an increasing of students who are able to answer
questions from the teacher or other students. So, on indicator B of Creative Thinking Ability from the cycle I to cycle II there is an
increased. Table 23. Comparison of the Score Obtained by Students on Indicator C of Creative
Thinking Ability Cycle I to Cycle II
Score Indicator C of Creative Thinking Ability
Cycle I Siklus II
Differen ce
Explaination Amount
of Student
Amount of
Student 1
19 61,29
12 37,5
23,79 Amount of students
who obtain a score 1 decreased for
amount 23,79.
2 5
16,13 16
50 33,87
Amount of students who obtain a score 2
increased for amount 33,87.
3 7
22,58 4
12,5 10,08
Amount of students who obtain a score 3
decreased for amount 10,08.
Total 31
100 32
100 Source: primer data Table 12 and Table 17
Based on the Table 23, amount of students who obtain a score 1 decreased for amount 23,79 because an increasing amount of
students who were able to give an answer to the question by own mind at the learning process. On score 2 for amount 33,87 showed an
improvement of students who are able to give an answer to the question by own mind, but occasionally reading a book. Amount of
students who obtain a score 3 decreased from the cycle I to cycle II for amount 10,08 because an decreased amount of students who were
95 able to give an answer to the question by own mind without reading a
book, because the students are still not confident to deliver an idea with own mind. The students still confidently explained their ideas
with occasionally reading or viewing the contents of a book first. Table 24. Comparison of the Score Obtained by Students on Indicator D of Creative
Thinking Ability Cycle I to Cycle II
Score Indicator D of Creative Thinking Ability
Cycle I Cycle II
Differen ce
Explanation Amount
of Student
Amount of
Student 1
25 80,64
17 53,13
27,51 Amount of students
who obtain a score 1 decreased for
amount 27,51.
2 1
3,23 7
21,87 18,64
Amount of students who obtain a score 2
increased for amount 18,64.
3 5
16,13 8
25 8.87
Amount of students who obtain a score 3
increased for amount 8,87.
Total 31
100 32
100 Source: primer data Table 12 and Table 17
Based on the Table 24, the amount of students who obtain a score 1 decreased for amount 27,51 because an increasing amount of
students who are able to put forward the reason answer of question successfully answered by students during the learning process.
Amount of students who obtain a score 2 increased for amount 18,64 because the students are able to give reasons for the answer of the
question that successfully answered by the students, but has not been yet obtimal in explaining it. While on score 3, there is an increase for