Presupposition Review of Related Theories
us ingroups and them outgroups” 2001: 112. Based on their statement, it means that discourse is seen as ideological that it establishes a polarized group
consisting of ingroups and outgroups oppositions. Thus, it is believed that CDA witnesses
“an overall strategy of positive self-presentation and negative other presentation” Wodak and Meyer, 2001: 112. In other words, it means that CDA
examines an ideology in a discourse that has an objective to emphasize the ingroups‟ good things positive self-presentation and the outgroups‟ bad things
negative other presentation. Other than the study of ideologically biased discourse, it is emphasized
by Wodak and Meyer that CDA is “the study of the many forms of implicit or
indirect meanings, such as implications, presuppositions, allusions, vagueness, and so on” 2001: 113. They also point out that
implicit meanings related to underlying beliefs, that are not precisely asserted for various contextual reasons, including the well-known
ideological objective to de-emphasize our bad things and their good things Wodak and Meyer, 2001: 113.
Based on their points above, it means that CDA is a strategic tool to scrutinize presuppositions with their implicit meanings that carry an underlying
belief known as ideology that is not precisely asserted due to a contextual reason. Thus, emphasizing ingroups‟ good things and outgroups‟ bad things while de-
emphasizing ingroups‟ bad things and outgroups‟ good things is the strategy to imply the ideology in a presupposition that is used as a biased discourse.
CDA sees discourse as socially conditioned, which means it consitutes the social conditions among society and it is seen as a tool to retain and reproduce
the social status quo Weiss and Wodak, 2003: 13. In other words, the discourse PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
contributes a lot to the social practices in the status quo, which can be known as discursive practrices as well. In elaborating the idea of discursive practices, Weiss
and Wodak state that discursive practices may have major ideological effects
– that is, they can help produce and reproduce unequal power relations between for
instance social classes, women and men, and ethniccultural majorities and minorities through the ways in which they represent things and
position people 2003: 13.
Based on their point above, it means that such discourses used by people in a social status quo may carry an ideology that can be related to the unequal
power relations between the majority and the minority in the society. Therefore CDA focuses on how social power abuse, dominance, and inequality are enacted
and resisted in a social or political context Dijk, 2000: 18.