3. Development
In the development stage, the first draft of the English interactive learning multimedia was developed based on the course grid and the
flowchart by using Adobe Flash CS4 Professional action script 2.0 software. The interactive learning multimedia covers two skills reading
and writing and there are three units which are developed. 4.
Evaluation After the first draft has been designed, the researcher conducted expert
judgment to evaluate the interactive multimedia. Expert judgment was conducted twice in this research. The first one was proposed to the
materials evaluator to evaluate the interactive multimedia in terms of its content appropriateness. The second one was proposed to the media
evaluator to evaluate the interactive multimedia in terms of its design appropriateness.
5. Revision
After getting feedback from the expert judgment, the researcher revised the first draft of the interactive multimedia. The revised draft then
called as the final product of the interactive learning multimedia.
E. Data Collection Techniques
There were two techniques of data collection which were implemented in this research. The first one was needs analysis which was conducted before the
first draft of the interactive multimedia was designed. The data were about the target needs and the learning needs analysis collected by distributing the first
questionnaire guidelines. The second one was expert judgment which was conducted after developing the first draft of the interactive multimedia. The
data were conducted to evaluate the developed interactive multimedia in terms of its content and design appropriateness by giving expert judgment
questionnaire to the materials and the media experts.
F. Data Collection Instruments
As the researcher has explained earlier, there were two techniques of questionnaires guidelines which were used in collecting the data for this
research. They are needs analysis questionnaires and expert judgment questionnaires.
1. Need Analysis Questionnaire
Needs analysis questionnaire was made to obtain the data about the target needs and learning needs from the students before the development
of the first draft of the interactive multimedia. The result of this questionnaire was used as the input in developing the first draft of the
interactive learning multimedia. The organization of the questionnaire for needs analysis is shown below:
Table 3.1. The Organization of Needs Analysis Questionnaire
No. Aspects of
the questions
The purpose of the questions Item
number References
Target Needs
1. Necessities
To find out the students’ necessity
related to
the materials.
1 Hutchinson Waters
1987: 55 2.
Lacks To find out the students’ lacks
related to the material. 2-4
Hutchinson Waters 1987: 55-56
continued
3. Wants
To find out the students’ want related to the materials.
5 Hutchinson Waters
1987: 56
Learning Needs
4. Input
To find out students’ preference
for types input. 6-11
Nunan 2004: 47-52 5.
Design To find out students’ preference
for multimedia design. 12-15
Alessi Trolip 2001: 53-54; 68-77
6. Procedures
To find out students’ preference for learning activities.
16-17 Nunan 2004: 52-56
7. Teacher’s
role To find out students’ preference
related to teacher’s role. 18
Nunan 2004: 64-70 8.
Setting To find out students’ preference
related to learning setting. 19
Nunan 2004: 70-73
2. Expert Judgment Questionnaire
Expert judgment questionnaire was used as the instrument to evaluate the first draft of the developed interactive multimedia from the experts in
terms of its content and design appropriateness. The questionnaire was distributed twice to the materials and the media experts of English
Education Department. The questions related to the content were adapted from Instrumen Penilaian Buku Bahasa Inggris SMA by BSNP while the
questions related to the media were adapted from Evaluation Form by Alessi and Trolip. The organization of the questionnaire for expert
judgment is shown below:
Table 3.2. The Organization of Expert Judgment Questionnaire
No. Aspects of
the questions
The purpose of the questions Item
number References
Content appropriateness
1. Content
To evaluate the first draft of the interactive multimedia in terms of
its materials appropriateness. 1-13
BSNP continued
continued
2. Language
To evaluate the first draft of the interactive multimedia in terms of
its language appropriateness. 14-21
BSNP
3. Presentation
To evaluate the first draft of the interactive multimedia in terms of
the presentation of the materials. 22-26
BSNP Alessi Trolip
2001: 60-62
Design appropriateness
4. Screen
appearance To evaluate the first draft of the
interactive multimedia in terms of its
screen appearance
appropriateness. 27-34
Alessi Trolip 2001: 60-77
5. Multimedia
elements To evaluate the first draft of the
interactive multimedia in terms of its elements appropriateness.
35-37 Alessi Trolip
2001: 62-68 6.
Navigation buttons
To evaluate the first draft of the interactive multimedia in terms of
its buttons appropriateness. 38-41
Alessi Trolip 2001: 53-54
7. Feedback
To evaluate the first draft of the interactive multimedia in terms of
its feedback appropriateness. 42-44
Alessi Trolip 2001
G. Data Analysis Techniques
