Tabel 4.4 Iteration History
a,b,c,d
Iteration -2 Log
likelihood Coefficients
Constant Tenure Reputasi1 Spesialisasi1 Ukuran
Step 1 1
40.683 .383
-.735 -.077
2.110 -1.004 2
39.161 .507
-1.218 -.123
2.758 -1.015 3
39.156 .712
-1.428 -.140
3.006 -1.036 4
39.145 .793
-1.459 -.133
3.039 -1.042 5
39.145 .793
-1.459 -.121
3.039 -1.042 a. Method: Enter
b. Constant is included in the model. c. Initial -2 Log Likelihood: 52.193
d. Estimation terminated at iteration number 5 because parameter estimates changed by less than ,001
Variables in the Equation
B S.E.
Wald df
Sig. ExpB
Step 1 Tenure
-1,459 ,964
2,288 1
,132 2,869
Reputasi 1
.598 ,684
,766 1
,039 .121
Spesialis asi1
-2,044 1,420
3,585 1
,383 .276
Ukuran -1,854
,924 3,035
1 ,443
.140 Constant
,889 1,292
,474 1
.994 2,354
a. Variables entered on step 1: Tenure, Reputasi, Spesialisasi, Ukuran.
Iteration History
a,b,c
Iteration -2 Log likelihood
Coefficients Constant
Step 0 1
52.237 -.937
2 52.193
-1.031 3
52.193 -1.067
4 52.193
-1.067 a. Constant is included in the model.
b. Initial -2 Log Likelihood: 52.193 c. Estimation terminated at iteration number 4 because parameter estimates changed by less
than .001.
Model Summary
Step -2 Log likelihood
Cox Snell R Square
Nagelkerke R Square 1
39.145
a
.264 .393
a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 20 because maximum iterations has been reached. Final solution cannot be found.
Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients
Chi-square Df
Sig. Step 1
Step 12,707
4 ,232
Block 12,707
4 ,232
Model 12,707
4 ,232
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Al-Thuneibat, A.A; R. T. I. Al Issa; dan R. A. A. Baker. 2011. Do audit tenure and firm size contribute to audit quality?: empirical evidence from Jordan.
Managerial AuditingJournal, 26, 4, hlm. 317-334 Arens, A. Alvin James K. Loebbecke. 2008. Auditing and Assurances Services
- An Integrated Approach. Edisi Keduabelas. Prentice Hall.
Balsam, S., J. Khrishnan, and J.S. Yang.“Auditor Industry Specialization And Earning Quality. “Auditing: A Journal Of Practice Theory 22”, no. 2
2003: 71-97 Boedijoewono, Nugroho. 2007. Pengantar Statistika Ekonomi dan Bisnis.Jilid 2.
Yogyakarta: Unit Penerbit dan Percetakan STIM YKPN. Carey, P. dan R. Simnett. 2006. “Audit Partner Tenure and Audit Quality”. The
Accounting Review.81 3.pp. 653—676. Chen, et al. 2005.An empirical investigation of the relationship between
intellectual capital and firm’s market value and financial performance. Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol 6, Issue 2.
DeAngelo, L.E. 1981a. “Auditor Independence, “Low Balling”, and Disclosure Rregulation”.Journal of Accounting and Economics.August.pp. 113—
127.DeAngelo, L.E. 1981b.“Auditor Size and Audit Quality”.Journal of Accounting and Economics.December. pp. 183—199
Dopuch, N. D. Simunic. 1982. Competition in auditing research: an assessment. Paper read at the 4th symposium on auditing research, University of
Illinois. Elfarini, Eunike Christina. 2007. Pengaruh Kompetensi dan Independensi Auditor
Terhadap Kualitas Audit :Studi Empiris Pada Kantor Akuntan Publik di Jawa Tengah. Semarang: program sarjana Universitas Negeri Semarang
Flint, David. 1988. Philosophy and Principles of Auditing: An Introduction; Houndmills et al. 1988.
Fitriany. 2012. Analisis komprehensif pengaruh kompetensi dan independensi akuntan publik terhadap kualitas audit. Disertasi Fakultas Ekonomi
Universitas Indonesia Departmen Akuntansi: Depok. Ghozali, Imam. 2006. Aplikasi Anlisis Multivariate dengan Program SPSS.
Semarang : Badan Penerbit Universitas Dipenegoro. Geiger, M. A. and Raghunandan, K. 2002. Auditor Tenure and Audit Reporting
Failures.Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 21 1: 67-78.
Johnson, V. E., I. K. Khurana, dan J. K. Reynolds. 2002. Audit-Firm Tenure and The Quality of Financial Reports. Contemporary Accounting Research
194: h:637-660 Lee, C.J., C. Liu, dan T. Wang. 1999. “The 150-hour Rule”. Journal of
Accounting and Economics.27 2.pp. 203—228. Mulyadi. 2002. Auditing Edisi 6 Buku 1. Jakarta: Salemba Empat
Nasser Abu Thahir, Emelin A.W., Sharifah, dan Mohammad Hudaib. 2006. Auditor – client Relationship : the case of audit tenure and auditor
switching in Malaysia. “Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 21, No. 7, pp. 724-73
Sumarwato. 2006. Pengaruh Kebijakan Rotasi KAP terhadap Kualitas Laporan Keuangan . Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing, Vol. 2 No. 1, 68-104
Widiastuty, E., dan R. Febrianto. 2003. Pengukuran kualitas sebuah audit: sebuah esai.http:go.to.web.iddownloadjurnaljurnaljurnalakuntansidanbisnis
PENGUKURANKUALITASAUDITSEBUAHESAIrahmatfebriantofin.p df?attredirects=0d=1.diaksespada 9 Juni 2012.
Wibowo, A., Rossieta H. 2009. Faktor-faktorDeterminasi Kualitas Audit: Suatu Studi dengan Pendekatan Earnings Surprise Benchmark. Simposium
Nasional AkuntansiXII Wallace, W.A 1980 The Economics Role of the Audit in Free and Regulated
Markets. Touch Ross Co. Aid To Education Program Dalam Watkins Ann L, Hillison, William, Microsoft,Susan E.2004.Audit Quality: A
Synthesis of Theory and Empiricial Evidance. Journal of Accounting Literature, Vol.23 pp.153-193
BAB III METODE PENELITIAN
3.1 Definisi Operasional Variabel
Kategori