Procedure of the Development

students opinions of the learning aids Hutchinson and Waters 2006: 64 Procedure 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 To find out the information about the learners‟ opinion of learning activities in the classroom. Nunan 2004: 52 Learners‟ role 32, 33 To find out learners‟ role in the classroom Nunan 2004: 14 2 The Second Questionnaire for the expert judgment While, the second questionnaire was distributed to expert in order to gain data about their opinions related to the designed materials. It was used as the basis for materials evaluation. In the second questionnaire, the evaluator was asked for opinion considering the designed materials. The evaluator was asked to respond whether they were strongly agree SA, agree A, disagree D, or strongly disagree SD about the statements presented in the questionnaire. The questions of this questionnaire were derived from Instruments of Evaluation of English Course books for Junior High School. The questions are divided into four items. Those are the appropriateness of the content, the appropriateness of the language, the appropriateness of the presentation, and the appropriateness of the graphic. Table 3.2 The Organization of The Second Questionnaire for Material Expert Components Aspects Item Number References Content Completeness BSNP Depth BSNP Retention BSNP Accuracy BSNP Elements and Structure of Meaning BSNP Life Skill Development BSNP Language The appropriateness at Developmental Level of Students BSNP Communicative BSNP The Unity of the Ideas BSNP Presentation Systematic BSNP Balance between the Units BSNP Students‟ center BSNP Autonomous BSNP Self Evaluation BSNP Graphic Paper Standard BSNP Typography BSNP

c. The Technique of Data Analysis

The data from need analysis and the expert judgment questionnaires was analyzed through descriptive statistics. The data gained from the needs analysis were analyzed by calculating the percentage of each answer in the first questionnaire. The answer with the highest percentage was considered as the representation of the learners‟ actual condition. The percentage was calculated using the following formula. P : Percentage f : frequency N : number of respondents 100 : fixed number