Score of Reading Comprehension with High Reading Interest B1.

6. Score of Reading Comprehension by Using DRTA Method with Low Reading Interest A1B2. Table 4.7 Frequency Table of Reading Comprehension by Using DRTA Method with Low Reading Interest Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 70 2 5.0 12.5 12.5 73 8 20.0 50.0 62.5 76 6 15.0 37.5 100.0 Total 16 40.0 100.0 Missing System 24 60.0 Total 40 100.0 Scoring the data for reading comprehension was done by using instrument with objective test multiple choice tests and the total items provided were 30 questions. For each question, the correct answer will be graded 1 and the incorrect answer will be graded 0. Hence, the maximum score will be 30, while minimum score will be 0. Respondents treated by DRTA method with low reading interest were 40 students. The empiric score stated that the highest score was 76, the lowest score was 70. Furthermore, mean was 73.75, median was 73.86, mode was 73, standard of deviation was 2.049 and variance was 4.200. The complete result gained from calculation can be seen below. The mean 73.75 indicated that the average score for the students was relatively good. The standard of deviation 2.409 indicated that the answers given by students using DRTA method with low reading interest were relatively the same. To make it clear, it can be seen the display of histogram and polygon presented below:

7. Score of Reading Comprehension by using Conventional Method

with High Reading Interest A2B1. Table 4.8 Frequency Table of Reading Comprehension by Using Conventional Method with High Reading Interest Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 63 1 2.5 6.3 6.3 67 1 2.5 6.3 12.5 70 4 10.0 25.0 37.5 73 6 15.0 37.5 75.0 80 2 5.0 12.5 87.5 83 2 5.0 12.5 100.0 Total 16 40.0 100.0 Missing System 24 60.0 Total 40 100.0 Scoring the data for reading comprehension was done by using instrument with objective test multiple choice tests and the total items provided were 30 questions. For each question, the correct answer will be graded 1 and the incorrect answer will be graded 0. Hence, the maximum score will be 30, while minimum score will be 0. Respondents treated by Conventional method with high reading interest were 40 students. The empiric score stated that the highest score was 83, the lowest score was 63. Furthermore, mean was 73.38.93, median was 72.40, mode was 73, standard of deviation was 5.584 and variance was 31.183. The complete result gained from calculation can be seen below. The mean 73.38 indicated that the average score for the students was relatively fair. The standard of deviation 5.584 indicated that the answers given by students using Conventional method with high reading interest were relatively the same. To make it clear, it can be seen the display of histogram and polygon presented below: