41 tasks or procedures, the intended result of assessment or the interpretation of the
assessment result, and the uses of the assessments throughout the instruction. Finally, the writer concluded the content validity degree of each assessment along
with the explanation why the assessment categorized in that degree.
4. Figuring Out the Problems
Next step was figuring out some problems which influence the degree of content validity of the assessment produced by the participants. The problems
could be originated not only from the assessment production, but also it could be originated starting from the content statement and the objectives formulation. The
unclear objective formulations would influence the content validity degree of the assessment. Afterwards, the writer proposed some possible recommendations to
overcome the problems.
5. Conclusion
At last, the writer concluded the result and offered possible recommendations to improve the production of content-valid assessment. Finally,
the writer wrote up the report.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
42
CHAPTER IV RESEARCH RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
This chapter consists of both the presentation and discussion of the research findings. These are two sections presented in this chapter. The first
section A, which is the answer for the first research question, discusses how the Practice Teaching students established the content validity in their assessments.
The second section B discusses the problems which influenced the content validity degree of the Practice Teaching students’ assessments and provided some
possible recommendations to overcome the problems.
A. Establishing Content Validity in Assessment
In this part, the writer presented the data and the analysis of the data. The data were the Practice Teaching students’ lesson plans and assessments. There
were ten lesson plans with each of its assessment, which belonged to five randomly chosen Practice Teaching students. Those data were analyzed in order
to obtain the idea about how the students establish content validity in their assessments. The analysis presented in this chapter would not show all of the
analysis conducted by the writer for all of the documents. The writer presented some of the analysis to represent the idea of how the respondents tried to make
their assessment valid based on the principle of content validity the full analysis could be found in Appendix B.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
