76 hopes that the students can appropriately use the assessments as what the
assessments are purposed for and they can produce high quality assessments which do not only focus on its validity but also focus on the other aspects of the
sound assessments.
3. For Future Researchers
Since the participants and areas of this research were limited, the writer recommends other scholars to conduct researches involving more participants and
larger areas. Besides, the writer also suggests researching further on other specific issues related to the production of high quality assessments which can be the
useful aids for the people who are in charge of the educational field, especially for those who are involved in assessment field, as a means to educate not only to give
the final score.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
77
REFERENCES
Airasian, P. W. 1991. Classroom Assessment. New York: McGraw Hill, Inc. Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., and Razavieh, A. 2002. Introduction to Research in
Education 6
th
ed.. Belmont: Wadsworth Thomson Learning. Brown, H. D. 2001. Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to
Language Pedagogy 2
nd
ed.. New York: Pearson Education, Inc. Brown, H. D. 2004. Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices.
New York: Pearson Education, Inc. Brown, J. D., and Rodgers, T. 2002. Doing Second Language Research. Oxford:
Oxford University Press. Brown, J. Dean. 2006. Testing in Language Programs: A Comprehensive Guide
to English Language Assessment. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc. Chatterji, M. 2003. Designing and Using Tools for Educational Assessment.
New York: Pearson Education, Inc. Earl, L. 2003. Assessment as Leaning: Using Classroom Assessment to
Maximise Student Learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. Golafshani, N. 2003. Understanding Reliability and Validity in Qualitative
Research. The
Qualitative Report,
VIII 4,
December 2003.
http:www.nova.edussssQR8-4golagshani.pdf, accessed on November 18, 2009.
Krippendorff, K. 2004. Content Analysis: Introduction to Its Methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Miller, M. D., Linn, R. L., Gronlund, N. E. 2009. Measurement and Assessment in Teaching 10
th
ed.. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
Nuendorf, K. A. 2002. The Content Analysis Guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
78 Poggenpoel, M., and Myburgh, C. 2003. The Researcher as Research Instrument
in Educational Research: A Possible Threat to Trustworthiness? Education Journal, Vol. 124. http:www.questia.comgooglleScholar.qst;jsession
=KgdTl3Dftb8cBj KnbsmCv6n5LqsPr9xZhJ2R72L67W7Tl1dh1WLl-
481857147 16421419?docId=5002093691, accessed on December, 2011 Price, K. M., and Nelson, K. L. 2011. Planning Effective Instruction: Diversity
Responsive Methods and Management. Wadsworth: Cengage Learning. Salvia, J., Ysseldyke, J. E., and Bolt, S. 2001. Assessment in Special and
Inclusive Education 11
th
ed.. Wadsworth: Cengage Learning. Siddiek, A. G. 2010. The Impact of Test Content Validity on Language
Teaching and Learning [Electronic version]. Asian Social Science, 6 4, 133 – 143.
Walker, C., and Schmidt, E. 2004. Smart-test: Teacher Made Test that Help Students Learn. Canada: Pembroke Publishers.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
79
APPENDIX A
The Sample of Respondents’ Documents
First Documents of the First Respondent Second Documents of the Second Respondent
First Documents of the Third Respondent First Documents of the Fourth Respondent
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
80
The First Documents of the First Respondent
Lesson Plan
School : Santa Maria Senior High School Yogyakarta
Course : English reading-writing
Class Semester : XI IS 2 One
Competence Standard : 5. To understand the meaning of short functional
text and simple essays about report, narrative, and analytical exposition in daily life contexts and to
access knowledge.
Basic Competence : 5.2. To respond meaning and rhetoric steps in
essays that use kind of written languages accurately, smoothly, and acceptably in daily life context and to
access knowledge in text: narrative.
Indicators : Students are able to
• Identify the social function of narrative text
• Identify the main idea of narrative text
• Identify the generic structure of narrative text
• Identify the language features of narrative text
• Write a narrative text
Time Allocation : 2 x 45 minutes
A. Learning Objectives:
