62
7.
Completing words, arranging words, filling in, matching, mentioning the name of the things and puzzle are the tasks that are usually given to the students. They use the same
tasks but change the questions according to the topics given.
8.
The tasks are given in the last part of every meeting because the two instructors give students explanation in the beginning and in the middle of the lesson. In addition, the
tasks can be used to measure students’ ability in understanding the topics.
9.
Students have to finish the tasks individually but when there is a game they have to work in group.
10.
The difficulties for the students in learning English are that students are difficult to memorize new words in English, they are difficult to concentrate and students do not
have a handbook, so they cannot study English in home.
2. Results of the Evaluation of the Designed Materials
In this part, the writer discusses the data which were obtained from questionnaire after the writer designed the materials. The discussion covers the
description of the respondents, evaluation of the designed materials and the respondents’ opinions and suggestions toward the designed materials. Further
explanation can be described below:
a. The Description of the Respondents
The respondents for this evaluation were five people. The five respondents were two English teachers in Kanisius Notoyudan and three lecturers of English
Education Study Program in Sanata Dharma University. All the respondents have more than one-year experience in teaching English. Four of them are female and
the rest is male. All of the respondents have got bachelor degree, and one of them has also got master degree. The data about the respondents were presented in the
table 4.4.
Table 4.4 the Description of the Respondents
Sex Educational Background
Teaching experience In years
Group of Respondents
F M S1 S2 1-5
6-10 10
English Teachers 2 2
2 English
Lectures 2 1 2 1 1
2
63
b. The Evaluation of the Designed Materials
The writer used questionnaire in order to gain an assessment of the designed materials. The respondents’ opinion were expressed in numbers showing
their degree of agreement which ranged from 1 to 5. The numbers of agreement were classified as follows:
1: if the respondents strongly disagree with the statements 2: if the respondents disagree with the statements
3: if the respondents are uncertain with the statements 4: if the respondents agreed with the statements
5: if the respondents strongly agreed with the statements The data are collected and presented in the table 4.5.
Table 4.5 the Descriptive Statistics of the Respondents’ Opinion
Central Tendency NO.
Respondents’ Opinion on: N Mean
1. The goal is well formulated.
5 4.2
2. The achievement indicators are well formulated.
5 4.2 3.
The achievement indicators are able to support the attainment of the goal.
5 4.2 4.
The topics are well selected and arranged. 5
4.2 5.
The materials match with the goal and the achievement indicators.
5 4.2 6.
The pre-task, task-cycle and language focus are well-developed.
5 3.8 7.
The materials are interesting, suitable, and relevant for the second grade of elementary
school. 5 4.6
8. The materials are able to help students to
develop their vocabulary mastery. 5 4.2
9. The variations of the tasks are able to support
the attainment of the goal and the achievement indicators.
5 3.6 10.
The use of Task-Based Learning to teach vocabulary is well-developed.
5 3.8 11.
The content is relevant with the context and the situation which the language is used.
5 3.6 12.
Generally, the instructional materials are well elaborated
5 4
64
Note : N
: Number of Respondents Mn
: Mean as the indicators of central tendency of the set of scores. The data presented above show that the average point of the respondents’
agreement toward the designed materials is 3.6 to 4.6. The average point of agreement Mean on the designed materials evaluation is 4.05. The result shows
that the respondents gave positive judgement and opinions about the designed materials, and also agreed with the designed materials. Therefore, the writer
concluded that the designed materials are good and acceptable.
c. The Respondents’ Opinions, and Suggestions
